The Icecube Data Acquisition Software: Lessons Learned During Distributed, Collaborative, Multi-Disciplined Software Development

Abstract. In this experiential paper we report on lessons learned during the development of the data acquisition software for the IceCube project -specifically, how to effectively address the unique challenges presented by a distributed, collaborative, multi-institutional, multi-disciplined project...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: K S Beattie, C T Day, D Glowacki, K D Hanson, J E Jacobsen, C P Mcparland, S J Patton
Other Authors: The Pennsylvania State University CiteSeerX Archives
Format: Text
Language:English
Subjects:
Online Access:http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.1062.2616
Description
Summary:Abstract. In this experiential paper we report on lessons learned during the development of the data acquisition software for the IceCube project -specifically, how to effectively address the unique challenges presented by a distributed, collaborative, multi-institutional, multi-disciplined project such as this. While development progress in software projects is often described solely in terms of technical issues, our experience indicates that non-and quasi-technical interactions play a substantial role in the effectiveness of large software development efforts. These include: selection and management of multiple software development methodologies, the effective use of various collaborative communication tools, project management structure and roles, and the impact and apparent importance of these elements when viewed through the differing perspectives of hardware, software, scientific and project office roles. Even in areas clearly technical in nature, success is still influenced by non-technical issues that can escape close attention. In particular we describe our experiences on software requirements specification, development methodologies and communication tools. We make observations on what tools and techniques have and have not been effective in this geographically disperse (including the South Pole) collaboration and offer suggestions on how similarly structured future projects may build upon our experiences.