Functioning of microphytobenthos in estuaries

Abstract The benthic primary production of subtidal coastal sediments is grossly under sampled -especially in relation to its potential importance. This is partly due to lack of appropriate measuring techniques. Microsensor approaches represent a strong tool for describing and quantifying microscale...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Kromkamp
Other Authors: The Pennsylvania State University CiteSeerX Archives
Format: Text
Language:English
Published: 2006
Subjects:
Online Access:http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.1040.733
http://www.vliz.be/imisdocs/publications/138747.pdf
id ftciteseerx:oai:CiteSeerX.psu:10.1.1.1040.733
record_format openpolar
spelling ftciteseerx:oai:CiteSeerX.psu:10.1.1.1040.733 2023-05-15T15:13:50+02:00 Functioning of microphytobenthos in estuaries Kromkamp The Pennsylvania State University CiteSeerX Archives 2006 application/pdf http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.1040.733 http://www.vliz.be/imisdocs/publications/138747.pdf en eng http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.1040.733 http://www.vliz.be/imisdocs/publications/138747.pdf Metadata may be used without restrictions as long as the oai identifier remains attached to it. http://www.vliz.be/imisdocs/publications/138747.pdf text 2006 ftciteseerx 2020-03-08T01:24:13Z Abstract The benthic primary production of subtidal coastal sediments is grossly under sampled -especially in relation to its potential importance. This is partly due to lack of appropriate measuring techniques. Microsensor approaches represent a strong tool for describing and quantifying microscale benthic photosynthesis and related processes, however, spatial and temporal extrapolation from single point measurements in heterogeneous subtidal sediments is complicated. Complementary use of chambers and 14 C incubations can be helpful but these approaches have their own caveats and limitations. New approaches such as in situ PAM measurements and in situ PAM imagine may turn out to be very helpful in extrapolating microsensor data to larger scales -and robust intercalibrations between the techniques have been presented. Planar O 2 optodes and O 2 eddy-correlation measurements represent other very promising in situ approaches that overcome the limitations of microscale techniques for accessing benthic primary production. The present manuscript gives a brief review on available microscale techniques for quantifying subtidal benthic primary production Introduction The potential importance of subtidal benthic microphytes for local, regional and global carbon cycling is becoming increasingly recognized. In 2003, there existed a little more than 100 studies quantifying the benthic primary production in marine areas but most of these most have been performed in the intertidal zone (Cahoon 1999). Subtidal studies amount to less than 40 and only around 10 studies have been performed at water depth >5 m. Only 4 studies have been conducted in the Arctic area, hosting the relatively largest area of shallow-water, shelf sediment. Our current database on benthic microphytic activity in subtidal areas is very limited. Apart from the relative few studies on benthic microphytic activity, the use of various techniques; 14 C-incubations, chamber incubations and microsensor approaches hamper the assessment of benthic microphytes ... Text Arctic Unknown Arctic
institution Open Polar
collection Unknown
op_collection_id ftciteseerx
language English
description Abstract The benthic primary production of subtidal coastal sediments is grossly under sampled -especially in relation to its potential importance. This is partly due to lack of appropriate measuring techniques. Microsensor approaches represent a strong tool for describing and quantifying microscale benthic photosynthesis and related processes, however, spatial and temporal extrapolation from single point measurements in heterogeneous subtidal sediments is complicated. Complementary use of chambers and 14 C incubations can be helpful but these approaches have their own caveats and limitations. New approaches such as in situ PAM measurements and in situ PAM imagine may turn out to be very helpful in extrapolating microsensor data to larger scales -and robust intercalibrations between the techniques have been presented. Planar O 2 optodes and O 2 eddy-correlation measurements represent other very promising in situ approaches that overcome the limitations of microscale techniques for accessing benthic primary production. The present manuscript gives a brief review on available microscale techniques for quantifying subtidal benthic primary production Introduction The potential importance of subtidal benthic microphytes for local, regional and global carbon cycling is becoming increasingly recognized. In 2003, there existed a little more than 100 studies quantifying the benthic primary production in marine areas but most of these most have been performed in the intertidal zone (Cahoon 1999). Subtidal studies amount to less than 40 and only around 10 studies have been performed at water depth >5 m. Only 4 studies have been conducted in the Arctic area, hosting the relatively largest area of shallow-water, shelf sediment. Our current database on benthic microphytic activity in subtidal areas is very limited. Apart from the relative few studies on benthic microphytic activity, the use of various techniques; 14 C-incubations, chamber incubations and microsensor approaches hamper the assessment of benthic microphytes ...
author2 The Pennsylvania State University CiteSeerX Archives
format Text
author Kromkamp
spellingShingle Kromkamp
Functioning of microphytobenthos in estuaries
author_facet Kromkamp
author_sort Kromkamp
title Functioning of microphytobenthos in estuaries
title_short Functioning of microphytobenthos in estuaries
title_full Functioning of microphytobenthos in estuaries
title_fullStr Functioning of microphytobenthos in estuaries
title_full_unstemmed Functioning of microphytobenthos in estuaries
title_sort functioning of microphytobenthos in estuaries
publishDate 2006
url http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.1040.733
http://www.vliz.be/imisdocs/publications/138747.pdf
geographic Arctic
geographic_facet Arctic
genre Arctic
genre_facet Arctic
op_source http://www.vliz.be/imisdocs/publications/138747.pdf
op_relation http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.1040.733
http://www.vliz.be/imisdocs/publications/138747.pdf
op_rights Metadata may be used without restrictions as long as the oai identifier remains attached to it.
_version_ 1766344349534126080