id |
ftciteseerx:oai:CiteSeerX.psu:10.1.1.1037.1492
|
record_format |
openpolar
|
spelling |
ftciteseerx:oai:CiteSeerX.psu:10.1.1.1037.1492 2023-05-15T18:08:22+02:00 Two modalities of case assignment: case in Sakha The Pennsylvania State University CiteSeerX Archives 2010 http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.1037.1492 en eng http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.1037.1492 Metadata may be used without restrictions as long as the oai identifier remains attached to it. text 2010 ftciteseerx 2020-03-08T01:16:41Z Abstract Two distinct ideas about how morphological case is assigned exist in the recent generative literature: the standard Chomskyan view that case is assigned by designated functional heads to the closest NP via an agreement relationship, and an alternative view in which case is assigned to one NP if there is a second NP in the same local domain (Marantz 1991). We claim that these two ways of assigning case are complementary, based on data from the Turkic language Sakha. Accusative case and dative case in this language are assigned by Marantz-style configurational rules that do not refer directly to functional categories. This is shown by evidence from passives, agentive nominalizations, subject raising, possessor raising, and case assignment in PPs. In contrast, there is evidence that nominative and genitive are assigned by functional heads in the Chomskyan way, as shown by the distribution of nominative case and the relationship between case marking and agreement. The two methods of case assignment thus coexist, not only in Universal Grammar, but even in the grammar of a single language. Text Sakha Unknown Sakha
|
institution |
Open Polar
|
collection |
Unknown
|
op_collection_id |
ftciteseerx
|
language |
English
|
description |
Abstract Two distinct ideas about how morphological case is assigned exist in the recent generative literature: the standard Chomskyan view that case is assigned by designated functional heads to the closest NP via an agreement relationship, and an alternative view in which case is assigned to one NP if there is a second NP in the same local domain (Marantz 1991). We claim that these two ways of assigning case are complementary, based on data from the Turkic language Sakha. Accusative case and dative case in this language are assigned by Marantz-style configurational rules that do not refer directly to functional categories. This is shown by evidence from passives, agentive nominalizations, subject raising, possessor raising, and case assignment in PPs. In contrast, there is evidence that nominative and genitive are assigned by functional heads in the Chomskyan way, as shown by the distribution of nominative case and the relationship between case marking and agreement. The two methods of case assignment thus coexist, not only in Universal Grammar, but even in the grammar of a single language.
|
author2 |
The Pennsylvania State University CiteSeerX Archives
|
format |
Text
|
title |
Two modalities of case assignment: case in Sakha
|
spellingShingle |
Two modalities of case assignment: case in Sakha
|
title_short |
Two modalities of case assignment: case in Sakha
|
title_full |
Two modalities of case assignment: case in Sakha
|
title_fullStr |
Two modalities of case assignment: case in Sakha
|
title_full_unstemmed |
Two modalities of case assignment: case in Sakha
|
title_sort |
two modalities of case assignment: case in sakha
|
publishDate |
2010
|
url |
http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.1037.1492
|
geographic |
Sakha
|
geographic_facet |
Sakha
|
genre |
Sakha
|
genre_facet |
Sakha
|
op_relation |
http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.1037.1492
|
op_rights |
Metadata may be used without restrictions as long as the oai identifier remains attached to it.
|
_version_ |
1766180654908702720
|