Review on Dating Methods: Numerical Dating in the Quaternary Geology of High Asia

Over the past few years, OSL and TCN datings of glacial material from High Asia have come into fashion. To this day, however, these techniques do not permit safe calibration. The intensity of the cosmic ray flux is being modulated by the solar and terrestrial magnetic fields and their secular fluctu...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Kuhle, Matthias, Kuhle, Sabine
Format: Report
Language:English
Published: 2010
Subjects:
Online Access:http://ir.imde.ac.cn/handle/131551/5889
id ftchinacadscimhe:oai:ir.imde.ac.cn:131551/5889
record_format openpolar
spelling ftchinacadscimhe:oai:ir.imde.ac.cn:131551/5889 2023-05-15T16:41:00+02:00 Review on Dating Methods: Numerical Dating in the Quaternary Geology of High Asia Kuhle, Matthias Kuhle, Sabine 2010-06 http://ir.imde.ac.cn/handle/131551/5889 英语 eng JOURNAL OF MOUNTAIN SCIENCE Kuhle, Matthias,Kuhle, Sabine. Review on Dating Methods: Numerical Dating in the Quaternary Geology of High Asia[J]. JOURNAL OF MOUNTAIN SCIENCE,2010,7(2):105–122. http://ir.imde.ac.cn/handle/131551/5889 4 Calibration Of Numerical Dating Geomagnetic Field Excursions Solar Activity Interface Problem Tibetan Ice Sheet Dating Fallacy 期刊论文 2010 ftchinacadscimhe 2022-12-19T18:18:09Z Over the past few years, OSL and TCN datings of glacial material from High Asia have come into fashion. To this day, however, these techniques do not permit safe calibration. The intensity of the cosmic ray flux is being modulated by the solar and terrestrial magnetic fields and their secular fluctuations in the past. So far, these variations cannot be converted into the respective local TCN production rates for High Asia. We have reason to believe that the ages that are being calculated despite these uncertainties are generally overestimated. This assessment is supported by conventional radiocarbon dates and above all by the glacial chronology developed independently on the basis of the Quaternary geological method. The strongly emerging evidence for a much more extensive LGM glaciation of High Asia is, however, either being ignored or rejected by many authors, solely on the basis of the above-mentioned uncalibrated datings. This self-conceit based on the "dating fallacy", as we call it, should be avoided since it goes decidedly against the standards of the scientific method established in Quaternary geology and makes a fundamental scientific discussion impossible. Report Ice Sheet IMHE OpenIR (Institute of Mountain Hazards and Environment, Chinese Academy of Sciences)
institution Open Polar
collection IMHE OpenIR (Institute of Mountain Hazards and Environment, Chinese Academy of Sciences)
op_collection_id ftchinacadscimhe
language English
topic Calibration Of Numerical Dating
Geomagnetic Field Excursions
Solar Activity
Interface Problem
Tibetan Ice Sheet
Dating Fallacy
spellingShingle Calibration Of Numerical Dating
Geomagnetic Field Excursions
Solar Activity
Interface Problem
Tibetan Ice Sheet
Dating Fallacy
Kuhle, Matthias
Kuhle, Sabine
Review on Dating Methods: Numerical Dating in the Quaternary Geology of High Asia
topic_facet Calibration Of Numerical Dating
Geomagnetic Field Excursions
Solar Activity
Interface Problem
Tibetan Ice Sheet
Dating Fallacy
description Over the past few years, OSL and TCN datings of glacial material from High Asia have come into fashion. To this day, however, these techniques do not permit safe calibration. The intensity of the cosmic ray flux is being modulated by the solar and terrestrial magnetic fields and their secular fluctuations in the past. So far, these variations cannot be converted into the respective local TCN production rates for High Asia. We have reason to believe that the ages that are being calculated despite these uncertainties are generally overestimated. This assessment is supported by conventional radiocarbon dates and above all by the glacial chronology developed independently on the basis of the Quaternary geological method. The strongly emerging evidence for a much more extensive LGM glaciation of High Asia is, however, either being ignored or rejected by many authors, solely on the basis of the above-mentioned uncalibrated datings. This self-conceit based on the "dating fallacy", as we call it, should be avoided since it goes decidedly against the standards of the scientific method established in Quaternary geology and makes a fundamental scientific discussion impossible.
format Report
author Kuhle, Matthias
Kuhle, Sabine
author_facet Kuhle, Matthias
Kuhle, Sabine
author_sort Kuhle, Matthias
title Review on Dating Methods: Numerical Dating in the Quaternary Geology of High Asia
title_short Review on Dating Methods: Numerical Dating in the Quaternary Geology of High Asia
title_full Review on Dating Methods: Numerical Dating in the Quaternary Geology of High Asia
title_fullStr Review on Dating Methods: Numerical Dating in the Quaternary Geology of High Asia
title_full_unstemmed Review on Dating Methods: Numerical Dating in the Quaternary Geology of High Asia
title_sort review on dating methods: numerical dating in the quaternary geology of high asia
publishDate 2010
url http://ir.imde.ac.cn/handle/131551/5889
genre Ice Sheet
genre_facet Ice Sheet
op_relation JOURNAL OF MOUNTAIN SCIENCE
Kuhle, Matthias,Kuhle, Sabine. Review on Dating Methods: Numerical Dating in the Quaternary Geology of High Asia[J]. JOURNAL OF MOUNTAIN SCIENCE,2010,7(2):105–122.
http://ir.imde.ac.cn/handle/131551/5889
op_rights 4
_version_ 1766031442111889408