外部援助、文化轉譯與傳統制度：莫拉克災後屏東禮納里部落重建經驗

博士國立政治大學國家發展研究所 99261501 為什麼那些具備善意的外援性災後重建方案，經常面臨失敗的結果，尤其涉及跨文化的援助工作，可能讓原住民的「脆弱性」面臨更加惡化的問題？類似錯誤迄今仍不斷地在世界各地發生，臺灣也不例外。由於災難治理分為備災、救援、恢復與減災四個階段，其中救援與恢復最需要政府採取立即的應變措施，以指揮控制途徑執行由上而下的干預措施，迅速動員各方資源共同加入災後重建的工作，尤其依賴非政府組織的參與，導致政府官員、技術官僚或外部專家對於以現代化的方式執行災後重建工作具有共識：他們相信西方發展是災後重建最容易達到的捷徑，卻忽略被重建者獨特的在地文化與傳統制度特徵，造成重...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors:	黃詩涵, Huang, Shih-Han
Other Authors:	湯京平, Tang, Ching-Ping
Format:	Thesis
Language:	unknown
Published:	2020
Subjects:	外部援助文化轉譯傳統制度社區營造 External Aid Cultural Mediation Indigenous Institutions Community-Building Arctic
Online Access:	https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw//handle/140.119/132077 https://doi.org/10.6814/NCCU202001723

id	ftchengchi:oai:nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw:140.119/132077
record_format	openpolar
institution	Open Polar
collection	National Chengchi University Institutional Repository (NCCUIR)
op_collection_id	ftchengchi
language	unknown
topic	外部援助文化轉譯傳統制度社區營造 External Aid Cultural Mediation Indigenous Institutions Community-Building
spellingShingle	外部援助文化轉譯傳統制度社區營造 External Aid Cultural Mediation Indigenous Institutions Community-Building 黃詩涵 Huang, Shih-Han 外部援助、文化轉譯與傳統制度：莫拉克災後屏東禮納里部落重建經驗
topic_facet	外部援助文化轉譯傳統制度社區營造 External Aid Cultural Mediation Indigenous Institutions Community-Building
description	博士國立政治大學國家發展研究所 99261501 為什麼那些具備善意的外援性災後重建方案，經常面臨失敗的結果，尤其涉及跨文化的援助工作，可能讓原住民的「脆弱性」面臨更加惡化的問題？類似錯誤迄今仍不斷地在世界各地發生，臺灣也不例外。由於災難治理分為備災、救援、恢復與減災四個階段，其中救援與恢復最需要政府採取立即的應變措施，以指揮控制途徑執行由上而下的干預措施，迅速動員各方資源共同加入災後重建的工作，尤其依賴非政府組織的參與，導致政府官員、技術官僚或外部專家對於以現代化的方式執行災後重建工作具有共識：他們相信西方發展是災後重建最容易達到的捷徑，卻忽略被重建者獨特的在地文化與傳統制度特徵，造成重建者與被重建者在進行災後重建的互動中，與在地需求產生重大落差。而這樣的落差可以透過什麼樣的方式處理，讓重建者與被重建者在災後重建的供應與需求能夠被共同理解，不再只是對彼此的不滿與抱怨，而是匯集一起才有辦法提高災後重建的效果，透過屏東禮納里部落案例的呈現，相信可以帶給我們一些省思與啟發。 It is noteworthy that the many post-disaster reconstruction projects, though in good intention, led to unsatisfactory results. It was especially the case when the external aids were transferred to indigenous peoples with substantial cultural difference. Given the facts that indigenous communities often locate in geologically sensitive places and thus be more vulnerable to natural disasters and that reconstruction demands multiple resources, closing the cultural gap is essential to improve the governing performance. By examining the successful case of the Rinari Tribe of Pingtung, Taiwan, this dissertation demonstrates the vital role of “cultural mediators” by non-profit organizations in the tribe-rebuilding process. The mediators not only translate the value system and preference of the beneficiaries to the donators but also help the indigenous peoples to better integrate into the greater social and economic systems in the community-rebuilding process. This research offers insights on disaster relief politics and provides essential policy guidance for external engagement in the disaster governance in the context with great cultural diversity. 目錄\n謝辭 I\n摘要 III\nABSTRACT V\n第一章緒論 1\n第一節研究背景 1\n第二節研究動機與目的 6\n第三節章節安排 11\n第二章外部援助、文化轉譯與傳統制度 13\n第一節災害脆弱性與外部援助的主流地位 13\n第二節權力衝突、文化轉譯與傳統制度 24\n第三章研究設計 35\n第一節研究架構的演變與修正 35\n第二節研究方法與資料蒐集 40\n第三節個案選擇與研究範圍 45\n第四章屏東禮納里部落案例 49\n第一節背景 49\n第二節遷村搶址衝突爆發？傳統制度化解政府失靈危機 56\n第三節轉譯、跨部落溝通與共識凝聚 62\n第四節外部援助退場與禮納里部落自主生存能量的展現 87\n第五章案例分析 91\n第一節轉譯與衝突：現實世界上充斥著不和諧的轉譯經驗 91\n第二節文化轉譯機制的設計與功能 95\n第三節理想的轉譯：文化轉譯的訣竅 101\n第六章結論 ...
author2	湯京平 Tang, Ching-Ping
format	Thesis
author	黃詩涵 Huang, Shih-Han
author_facet	黃詩涵 Huang, Shih-Han
author_sort	黃詩涵
title	外部援助、文化轉譯與傳統制度：莫拉克災後屏東禮納里部落重建經驗
title_short	外部援助、文化轉譯與傳統制度：莫拉克災後屏東禮納里部落重建經驗
title_full	外部援助、文化轉譯與傳統制度：莫拉克災後屏東禮納里部落重建經驗
title_fullStr	外部援助、文化轉譯與傳統制度：莫拉克災後屏東禮納里部落重建經驗
title_full_unstemmed	外部援助、文化轉譯與傳統制度：莫拉克災後屏東禮納里部落重建經驗
title_sort	外部援助、文化轉譯與傳統制度：莫拉克災後屏東禮納里部落重建經驗
publishDate	2020
url	https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw//handle/140.119/132077 https://doi.org/10.6814/NCCU202001723
genre	Arctic
genre_facet	Arctic
op_relation	英文部分\nAmarasiri De Silva, M. W., 2009, “Ethnicity, Politics and Inequality: Post‐Tsunami Humanitarian Aid Delivery in Ampara District, Sri Lanka.” Disasters 33(2): 253-273.\nBankoff, Gregory, 2001, “Rendering the World Unsafe: ‘Vulnerability’ as Western Discourse.” Disasters 25(1): 19-35.\nBankoff, Greg, 2004, The Historical Geography of Disaster: ‘Vulnerability’ and ‘Local Knowledge’ in Western Discourse. In Mapping Vulnerability: Disasters, Development, and People, edited by Greg Bankoff, Georg Frerks, and Dorothea Hilhorst. London: Earthscan. Pp. 25-36.\nBoen, Teddy and Rohit Jigyasu, 2005, “Cultural Considerations for Post Disaster Reconstruction Post-Tsunami Challenges.” UNDP Conference. Available at\nhttp://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.547.429&rep=rep1&type=pdf\nBoin, Arjen and Allan McConnell, 2007, “Preparing for Critical Infrastructure Breakdowns: The Limits of Crisis Management and the Need for Resilience.” Contingencies and Crisis Management 15(1):50-59.\nBang, Henry Ngenyam and Roger Few, 2012, “Social Risks and Challenges in Post- Disaster Resettlement: The Case of Lake Nyos, Cameroon.” Journal of Risk Research 15(9): 1141-1157.\nBolin, Bob and Liza C. Kurtz, 2018, Race, Class, Ethnicity, and Disaster Vulnerability. In Handbook of Disaster Research, edited by H. Rodríguez, William Donner, and Joseph E. Trainor. Berlin: Springer Verlag. Pp. 181-199.\nChambers, Robert, 1989, “Editorial Introduction: Vulnerability, Coping and Policy.” IDS Bulletin 20(2): 1-7.\nChaudhury, Kumar Surjeet, Arpita Nibedita, and Pradipta Kumar Mishra, 2012, “Command and Control in Disaster Management.” Computer Science Issues 9(4): 256-259.\nChandrasekhar, Divya, Yang Zhang, and Yu Xiao, 2014, “Nontraditional Participation in Disaster Recovery Planning: Cases from China, India, and the United States.” Journal of the American Planning Association 80(4): 373-384.\nDudley, Eric, 1988, “Disaster Mitigation: Strong Houses or Strong Institutions?” Disasters12(2): 111-121.\nDekens, Julie, 2007, Local Knowledge for Disaster Preparedness: A Literature Review. Kathmandu, Nepal: International Centre for Integrated Mountain Development.\nEade, Deborah and Suzanne Williams, 1995, The Oxfam Handbook of Development and Relief. 1st ed. Oxford: Oxfam.\nEgan, Jude and Thomas Anderson, 2015, Considerations for a Model of Public-Private Sector Collaboration in the Provision of Disaster Relief: Incentives and Limits. In Emergency Management and Disaster Response Utilizing Public-Private Partnerships, edited by Marvine Paula Hamner, S. Shane Stovall, Doaa M. Taha and Salah C. Brahimi. Pp1-15.\nFordham, Maureen, 1999, “Participatory Planning for Flood Mitigation: Models and Approaches.” Australian Journal of Emergency Management 13(4): 27-34.\nFernando, Jude L., 2003, “NGOs and Production of Indigenous Knowledge Under the Condition of Postmodernity.” The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 590(1): 54-72.\nFrerks, Georg, Jeroen Warner, and Bart Weijs, 2011, “The Politics of Vulnerability and Resilience.” Ambiente & Sociedade 14(2): 105-122.\nGranot, Hayim, 1996, “Disaster Subcultures.” Disaster Prevention and Management: An International Journal 5(4): 36-40.\nGilbert, Claude, 1998, Studying Disaster: Changes in the Main Conceptual Tools. In What Is a Disaster? A Dozen Perspectives on the Question, edited by E. L. Quarantelli. New York: Routledge. Pp.11-18.\nGopalakrishnan, Chennat and Norio Okada, 2007, “Designing New Institutions for Implementing Integrated Disaster Risk Management: Key Elements and Future Directions.” Disasters 31(4): 353-372.\nGauthier, Martin, 2009, “Conflict and Institution: Reality and Translation.” Canadian Journal of Psychoanalysis 17(1): 3-13.\nGoodrick, Delwyn, 2014, “Comparative Case Studies.” Methodological Briefs Impact Evaluation No.9: 1-17.\nGill, Duane A. and Liesel A. Ritchie, 2018, “Contributions of Technological and Natech Disaster Research to the Social Science Disaster Paradigm.” In Handbook of Disaster Research, edited by Havidan Rodríguez, William Donner, and Joseph E. Trainor. Cham: Springer Nature. Pp. 39-60.\nHewitt, K., 1983, Interpretations of Calamity from the Perspective of Human Ecology. London: Allen and Unwin.\nHilhorst, Dorothea, 2003, “Responding to Disasters: Diversity of Bureaucrats, Technocrats and Local People.” International Journal of Mass Emergencies and Disasters 21(1): 37-55.\nHilhorst, Dorothea and Greg Bankoff and, 2004, Introduction: Mapping Vulnerability. In Mapping Vulnerability: Disasters, Development, and People, edited by Greg Bankoff, Georg Frerks, and Dorothea Hilhorst. London: Earthscan. Pp. 1-9.\nHelsloot, I. and A. Ruitenberg, 2004, “Citizen Response to Disasters: A Survey of Literature and Some Practical Implications.” Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management 12(3): 98-111.\nHewitt, Kenneth, 2009, “Culture and Risk: Understanding the Sociocultural Settings that Influence Risk from Natural Hazards.” Presented for Global E-Conference on Culture and Risk. Kathmandu: International Centre for Integrated Mountain Development, 2008, Pp.1-14. Available at\nhttps://www.preventionweb.net/files/11039_icimodculture1.pdf\nHaalboom, Bethany and David C. Natcher, 2012, “The Power and Peril of ‘Vulnerability’: Approaching Community Labels with Caution in Climate Change Research.” Arctic 65(3): 319-327.\nHilhorst, Dorothea, Judith Baart, Gemma van Der Haar, and Floor Maria Leeftink, 2015, “Is Disaster ‘Normal’ for Indigenous People? Indigenous Knowledge and Coping Practices.” Disaster Prevention and Management 24(4): 506-522.\nHerman, R.D.K., 2016, “Traditional Knowledge in a Time of Crisis: Climate Change, Culture and Communication.” Sustainability Science 11(1): 163-176.\nHsu, Minna, 2016, “Lost, Found and Troubled in Translation: Reconsidering Imagined Indigenous ‘Communities’ in Post-disaster Taiwan Settings.” Indigenous Peoples 12(1): 71-85.\nInternational Strategy for Disaster Reduction, 2006, “Background Paper for a Consultative Meeting on a ‘Global Network of NGOs for Community Resilience to Disasters’.” Available at\nhttps://www.unisdr.org/2008/partner-netw/ngos/meeting1-october-2006/NGOs_and_DRR_Background_Paper.pdf\nIslam, M. Rezaul and William J. Morgan, 2012, “Non-Governmental Organizations in Bangladesh: Their Contribution to Social Capital Development and Community Empowerment.” Community Development Journal 47(3): 369-385.\nIloka, Nnamdi G., 2016, “Indigenous Knowledge for Disaster Risk Reduction: An African Perspective.” Jamba: Journal of Disaster Risk Studies 8(1): 1-7.\nImperiale, Angelo J. and Frank Vanclay, 2019, “Command-and-Control, Emergency Powers, and the Failure to Observe United Nations Disaster Management Principles Following the 2009 L`Aquila Earthquake.” International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction No.36: 1-14.\nJoshi, Abhay and Misa Aoki, 2014, “The Role of Social Capital and Public Policy in Disaster Recovery: A Case Study of Tamil Nadu State, India.” International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction No.7: 100-108.\nKulatunga, Udayangani, 2010, “Impact of Culture towards Disaster Risk Reduction.” International Journal of Strategic Property Management 14(4): 304-313.\nKenneya, Christine and Suzanne Phibbsb, 2014, “Shakes, Rattles and Roll Outs: The Untold Story of Māori Engagement with Community Recovery, Social Resilience and Urban Sustainability in Christchurch, New Zealand.” Procedia Economics and Finance No.18:754-762.\nKobylarek, Aleksander, 2018, “Science as A Bridge. Science in Action.” Journal of Education Culture and Society 9(2): 5-8.\nLatour, Bruno, 1987, Science in Action: How to Follow Scientists and Engineers through Society. Cambridge: Harvard University.\nLi, Tania Murray, 2005, “Beyond ‘the State’ and Failed Schemes.” American Anthropologist 107(3): 383-394.\nLi, Tania Murray, 2007, The Will to Improve: Governmentality, Development, and the Practice of Politics, London: Duke University.\nLo, Alex Y. and Lewis T. O. Cheung, 2016, “Geographies of Social Capital: Catastrophe Experience, Risk Perception, and the Transformation of Social Space in Postearthquake Resettlements in Sichuan, China.” Annals of the American Association of Geographers 106(4): 874-890.\nManyena, Siambabala Bernard, 2006, “The Concept of Resilience Revisited.” Disasters 30(4): 434-450.\nMcEntire, David A., Colleen Gilmore Crocker MPH, and Ekong J. Peters, 2010, “Addressing Vulnerability through an Integrated Approach.” International Journal of Disaster Resilience in the Built Environment 1(1): 50-64.\nManyena, Siambabala Bernard, Geoff O`Brien, Phil O`Keefe, and Joanne Rose, 2011, “Disaster Resilience: A Bounce Back or Bounce Forward Ability?” Local Environment 16(5): 417-424.\nManyena, Siambabala Bernard, 2014, “Disaster Resilience: A Question of ‘Multiple Faces’ and ‘Multiple Spaces’?” International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction No.8: 1-9.\nMavridis, Dimitris, 2015, “Ethnic Diversity and Social Capital in Indonesia.” World Development 67: 376-395.\nOliver-Smith, Anthony, 1996, “Anthropological Research on Hazards and Disasters.” Annual Review of Anthropology No.25: 303-328.\nOliver-Smith, Anthony, 2004, Theorizing Vulnerability in a Globalized World: A Political Ecological Perspective. In Mapping Vulnerability: Disasters, Development, and People, edited by Greg Bankoff, Georg Frerks, and Dorothea Hilhorst. London: Earthscan. Pp.10-24.\nPandey, Bishnu H., and Kenji Okazaki, 2005, “Community Based Disaster Management: Empowering Communities to Cope with Disaster Risks.” Available at https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Community-Based-Disaster-Management-%3A-Empowering-to-Pandey-Okazaki/b76c55e5d2b32d900aa765e4aefe01540ba6cffa#paper-header\nPerry, Ronald W., 2006, What is a Disaster. In Handbook of Disaster Research, edited by Havidan Rodríguez, Enrico L. Quarantelli, and Russell R. Dynes. Berlin: Springer Verlag. Pp. 1-15.\nPutnam, Robert D., 2007, “E Pluribus Unum: Diversity and Community in the Twenty-first Century The 2006 Johan Skytte Prize Lecture.” Scandinavian Political Studies 30(2): 137-174.\nPerry, Ronald W., 2018, Defining Disasters: An Evolving Concept. In Handbook of Disaster Research, edited by Havidan Rodríguez, William Donner, and Joseph E. Trainor. Cham: Springer Nature. Pp. 3-22.\nQuarantelli, E. L. and R. R. Dynes, 1977, “Response to Social Crisis and Disaster.” Annual Review of Sociology 3(1): 23-49.\nRose, Nikolas, 1999, Powers of Freedom: Reframing Political Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.\nRose, Nikolas, Pat O’Malley, and Mariana Valverde, 2009, “Governmentality.” Legal Studies Research Paper No.09/94: 1-32.\nRahm, Laura, 2019, Gender-Biased Sex Selection in South Korea, India and Vietnam: Assessing the Influence of Public Policy. Cham: Springer Nature.\nRumbach, Andrew and Dolores Foley, 2014, “Indigenous Institutions and Their Role in Disaster Risk Reduction and Resilience: Evidence from the 2009 Tsunami in American Samoa.” Ecology and Society 19(1): 1-9.\nSchneider, Saundra K., 1992, “Governmental Response to Disasters: The Conflict between Bureaucratic Procedures and Emergent Norms.” Public Administration Review 52(2): 135-145.\nShirley, Mary M., 2008, Institutions and Development. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.\nSubedi, Jishnu, 2009, Indigenous Knowledge of Housing and Disaster Risk Reduction. In Indigenous Knowledge and Disaster Risk Reduction: from Practice to Policy, edited by Rajib shaw, Anshu Sharma, and Yukiko Takeuchi. New York: Nova Science Publishers.\nSökefeld, Martin, 2011, “Exploring the Link between Natural Disasters and Politics: the Case Studies of Pakistan and Peru?” Scrutiny No.5/6: 1-32.\nScannell, Leila, Robin S. Cox, Sarah Chisholm Fletcher, 2017, “Place-Based Loss and Resilience among Disaster-affected Youth.” Journal of Community Psychology 45(7): 859-876.\nTakeda, Margaret B. and Marilyn M. Helms, 2006, “‘Bureaucracy, Meet Catastrophe’ Analysis of the Tsunami Disaster Relief Efforts and Their Implications for Global Emergency Governance.” International Journal of Public Sector Management 19(2): 204-217.\nUNESCO, 2003, Convention for the Safeguarding of the Intangible Cultural Heritage, Available at http://www.unesco.org/culture/ich/index.php\nUnited Nations International Strategy for Disaster Reduction, 2015, Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction 2015-2030, 1st ed. Available at https://www.preventionweb.net/files/43291_sendaiframeworkfordrren.pdf\nWoolcock, Michael and Deepa Narayan, 2000, “Social Capital: Implications for Development Theory, Research, and Policy.” World Bank Research Observer 15(2): 225-249.\nWebb, Gary R., 2007, “The Sociology of Disaster.” In 21st Century Sociology , edited by Clifton D. Bryant and Dennis L. Peck. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications. Pp. 1-16.\nWilliams, Terry and Hardison, Preston, 2013, “Culture, Law, Risk and Governance: Contexts of Traditional Knowledge in Climate Change Adaptation.” Climatic Change No.120: 531-544.\nWolbers, Jeroen, Julie Ferguson, Peter Groenewegen, Femke Mulder, and Kees Boersma, 2016, “Two Faces of Disaster Response: Transcending the Dichotomy of Control and Collaboration during the Nepal Earthquake Relief Operation.” International Journal of Mass Emergencies and Disasters 34(3): 419-438.\nWebb, Gary R., 2018, The Cultural Turn in Disaster Research: Understanding Resilience and Vulnerability Through the Lens of Culture. In Handbook of Disaster Research, edited by Havidan Rodríguez, William Donner, and Joseph E. Trainor. Cham: Springer Nature. Pp.109-121.\nWorld Economic Forum, 2018, The Global Risks Report 2018, 13th ed. Available at http://wef.ch/risks2018\n\n中文部分\nLatour, Bruno著，劉文旋、鄭開譯，2005，《科學在行動：怎樣在社會中跟隨科學家和工程師》。北京：東方出版社。\nMerriam, Sharan B. and Elizabeth J. Tisdell著，邱炳坤等譯，2018，《質性研究:設計與施作指南》。臺北：五南。\nScott, James C.著，王曉毅譯，2019，《國家的視角：那些試圖改善人類狀況的項目是如何失敗的》。北京：社會科學文獻。\nYin, Robert K.著，尚榮安譯，2001，《個案研究法》。臺北：弘智文化。\nZolli, Andrew and Ann Marie Healy著，李振昌譯，2012，《恢復力》。臺北：商周。\n王增勇，2010，〈災後重建中的助人關係與原住民主體原住民要回到誰的家？〉。《臺灣社會研究季刊》78：437-449。\n亞磊絲．泰吉華坦，2007，《認識臺灣原住民族充滿藝術氣息的民族—魯凱族》。臺北：臺灣原住民族文化產業發展協會。\n台邦．撒沙勒，2012，〈災難、遷村與社會脆弱性：古茶波安的例子〉。《臺灣人類學刊》10(1)：51-92。\n行政院莫拉克颱風災後重建推動委員會，2012a，《愛與希望耀動生命力：莫拉克颱風災後重建3周年成果彙編（上）》。高雄：行政院莫拉克颱風災後重建推動委員會。\n行政院莫拉克颱風災後重建推動委員會，2012b，《愛與希望耀動生命力：莫拉克颱風災後重建3周年成果彙編（下）》。高雄：行政院莫拉克颱風災後重建推動委員會。\n行政院莫拉克颱風災後重建推動委員會，2014a，《莫拉克颱風災後重建5周年成果彙編》。高雄：行政院莫拉克颱風災後重建推動委員會。\n行政院莫拉克颱風災後重建推動委員會，2014b，《創新協力重建永續家園》。高雄：行政院莫拉克颱風災後重建推動委員會。\n何欣潔，2013，《在永久屋理想家：莫拉克災後三年，「永久屋」與人的故事》。臺中：莫拉克獨立新聞網。\n吳嘉苓，2015，〈訪談法〉。收錄於瞿海源等編，《社會及行為科學研究法：質性研究法》。臺北：東華。頁33-62。\n范麗娟，1992，〈深度訪談〉。收錄於謝臥龍等編，《質性研究》。臺北：心理。頁81-128。\n徐惠娟，2014，《災後產業重建發展之探討—以禮納里部落為例》。屏東：大仁科技大學文化創意產業研究所碩士論文。\n財團法人張榮發基金會，〈臺糖長榮酒店輔導禮納里產業發展成果報告書〉。財團法人張榮發基金會（臺北），執行期間2012年8 月至2013年9月。（未出版）\n陳雨嵐，2004，《臺灣的原住民》。臺北：遠足文化。\n陳永芳，2017，〈災前的災後復原重建計畫〉。收錄於王价巨等編，《災害管理：13堂專業的必修課程》。臺北：五南。頁 289-328。\n黃詩涵，2007，《社區總體營造的集體行動永續性：橙花鄉明星社區的目標發展與政府介入的政策角色》。嘉義：國立中正大學政治研究所碩士論文。\n黃智慧，2011，〈八八災後原住民族文化守護：理念與實務之落差〉。收錄於謝仕淵等編，《走入歷史田野系列叢書：行腳西拉雅》。臺北：國立臺灣歷史博物館。頁 131-152。\n湯京平、簡秀昭、張華，2013，〈參與式治理和正義的永續性：比較兩岸原住民發展政策的制度創意〉。《人文及社會科學集刊》25(3)：457-483。\n湯京平，2015，〈個案研究〉。收錄於瞿海源等編，《社會及行為科學研究法：質性研究法》。臺北：東華。頁249-280。\n達西烏拉彎．畢馬，2002，《臺灣的原住民—排灣族》。臺北：台原。\n楊弘任，2007，《社區如何動起來：黑珍珠之鄉的派系、在地師傅與社區總體營造》。新北：左岸文化。\n楊弘任，2010，〈專家系統下的地方知識：嘉邑行善團的造橋實作〉。《科技醫療與社會》(10)：129-189。\n楊弘任，2011，〈何謂在地性？從地方知識與在地範疇出發〉。《思與言》49(4)：5-29。\n潘淑滿，2003，《質性研究：理論與應用》，第三版。臺北：心理。\n謝祿宜、李祈恩，2019，〈災害安置復原中的組織工作與重建方案之形成〉。收錄於謝祿宜等編，《非營利組織災害援助服務：從零開始》。臺北：新學林。頁 71-82。\n\n G0099261501 doi:10.6814/NCCU202001723 https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw//handle/140.119/132077
op_doi	https://doi.org/10.6814/NCCU202001723
_version_	1810294174255153152
spelling	ftchengchi:oai:nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw:140.119/132077 2024-09-15T17:52:06+00:00 外部援助、文化轉譯與傳統制度：莫拉克災後屏東禮納里部落重建經驗 External Aids, Cultural Mediation, and Indigenous Institutions: Post-Disaster Reconstruction Experience of Rinari Tribe after Typhoon Morakot 黃詩涵 Huang, Shih-Han 湯京平 Tang, Ching-Ping 2020 https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw//handle/140.119/132077 https://doi.org/10.6814/NCCU202001723 unknown 英文部分\nAmarasiri De Silva, M. W., 2009, “Ethnicity, Politics and Inequality: Post‐Tsunami Humanitarian Aid Delivery in Ampara District, Sri Lanka.” Disasters 33(2): 253-273.\nBankoff, Gregory, 2001, “Rendering the World Unsafe: ‘Vulnerability’ as Western Discourse.” Disasters 25(1): 19-35.\nBankoff, Greg, 2004, The Historical Geography of Disaster: ‘Vulnerability’ and ‘Local Knowledge’ in Western Discourse. In Mapping Vulnerability: Disasters, Development, and People, edited by Greg Bankoff, Georg Frerks, and Dorothea Hilhorst. London: Earthscan. Pp. 25-36.\nBoen, Teddy and Rohit Jigyasu, 2005, “Cultural Considerations for Post Disaster Reconstruction Post-Tsunami Challenges.” UNDP Conference. Available at\nhttp://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.547.429&rep=rep1&type=pdf\nBoin, Arjen and Allan McConnell, 2007, “Preparing for Critical Infrastructure Breakdowns: The Limits of Crisis Management and the Need for Resilience.” Contingencies and Crisis Management 15(1):50-59.\nBang, Henry Ngenyam and Roger Few, 2012, “Social Risks and Challenges in Post- Disaster Resettlement: The Case of Lake Nyos, Cameroon.” Journal of Risk Research 15(9): 1141-1157.\nBolin, Bob and Liza C. Kurtz, 2018, Race, Class, Ethnicity, and Disaster Vulnerability. In Handbook of Disaster Research, edited by H. Rodríguez, William Donner, and Joseph E. Trainor. Berlin: Springer Verlag. Pp. 181-199.\nChambers, Robert, 1989, “Editorial Introduction: Vulnerability, Coping and Policy.” IDS Bulletin 20(2): 1-7.\nChaudhury, Kumar Surjeet, Arpita Nibedita, and Pradipta Kumar Mishra, 2012, “Command and Control in Disaster Management.” Computer Science Issues 9(4): 256-259.\nChandrasekhar, Divya, Yang Zhang, and Yu Xiao, 2014, “Nontraditional Participation in Disaster Recovery Planning: Cases from China, India, and the United States.” Journal of the American Planning Association 80(4): 373-384.\nDudley, Eric, 1988, “Disaster Mitigation: Strong Houses or Strong Institutions?” Disasters12(2): 111-121.\nDekens, Julie, 2007, Local Knowledge for Disaster Preparedness: A Literature Review. Kathmandu, Nepal: International Centre for Integrated Mountain Development.\nEade, Deborah and Suzanne Williams, 1995, The Oxfam Handbook of Development and Relief. 1st ed. Oxford: Oxfam.\nEgan, Jude and Thomas Anderson, 2015, Considerations for a Model of Public-Private Sector Collaboration in the Provision of Disaster Relief: Incentives and Limits. In Emergency Management and Disaster Response Utilizing Public-Private Partnerships, edited by Marvine Paula Hamner, S. Shane Stovall, Doaa M. Taha and Salah C. Brahimi. Pp1-15.\nFordham, Maureen, 1999, “Participatory Planning for Flood Mitigation: Models and Approaches.” Australian Journal of Emergency Management 13(4): 27-34.\nFernando, Jude L., 2003, “NGOs and Production of Indigenous Knowledge Under the Condition of Postmodernity.” The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 590(1): 54-72.\nFrerks, Georg, Jeroen Warner, and Bart Weijs, 2011, “The Politics of Vulnerability and Resilience.” Ambiente & Sociedade 14(2): 105-122.\nGranot, Hayim, 1996, “Disaster Subcultures.” Disaster Prevention and Management: An International Journal 5(4): 36-40.\nGilbert, Claude, 1998, Studying Disaster: Changes in the Main Conceptual Tools. In What Is a Disaster? A Dozen Perspectives on the Question, edited by E. L. Quarantelli. New York: Routledge. Pp.11-18.\nGopalakrishnan, Chennat and Norio Okada, 2007, “Designing New Institutions for Implementing Integrated Disaster Risk Management: Key Elements and Future Directions.” Disasters 31(4): 353-372.\nGauthier, Martin, 2009, “Conflict and Institution: Reality and Translation.” Canadian Journal of Psychoanalysis 17(1): 3-13.\nGoodrick, Delwyn, 2014, “Comparative Case Studies.” Methodological Briefs Impact Evaluation No.9: 1-17.\nGill, Duane A. and Liesel A. Ritchie, 2018, “Contributions of Technological and Natech Disaster Research to the Social Science Disaster Paradigm.” In Handbook of Disaster Research, edited by Havidan Rodríguez, William Donner, and Joseph E. Trainor. Cham: Springer Nature. Pp. 39-60.\nHewitt, K., 1983, Interpretations of Calamity from the Perspective of Human Ecology. London: Allen and Unwin.\nHilhorst, Dorothea, 2003, “Responding to Disasters: Diversity of Bureaucrats, Technocrats and Local People.” International Journal of Mass Emergencies and Disasters 21(1): 37-55.\nHilhorst, Dorothea and Greg Bankoff and, 2004, Introduction: Mapping Vulnerability. In Mapping Vulnerability: Disasters, Development, and People, edited by Greg Bankoff, Georg Frerks, and Dorothea Hilhorst. London: Earthscan. Pp. 1-9.\nHelsloot, I. and A. Ruitenberg, 2004, “Citizen Response to Disasters: A Survey of Literature and Some Practical Implications.” Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management 12(3): 98-111.\nHewitt, Kenneth, 2009, “Culture and Risk: Understanding the Sociocultural Settings that Influence Risk from Natural Hazards.” Presented for Global E-Conference on Culture and Risk. Kathmandu: International Centre for Integrated Mountain Development, 2008, Pp.1-14. Available at\nhttps://www.preventionweb.net/files/11039_icimodculture1.pdf\nHaalboom, Bethany and David C. Natcher, 2012, “The Power and Peril of ‘Vulnerability’: Approaching Community Labels with Caution in Climate Change Research.” Arctic 65(3): 319-327.\nHilhorst, Dorothea, Judith Baart, Gemma van Der Haar, and Floor Maria Leeftink, 2015, “Is Disaster ‘Normal’ for Indigenous People? Indigenous Knowledge and Coping Practices.” Disaster Prevention and Management 24(4): 506-522.\nHerman, R.D.K., 2016, “Traditional Knowledge in a Time of Crisis: Climate Change, Culture and Communication.” Sustainability Science 11(1): 163-176.\nHsu, Minna, 2016, “Lost, Found and Troubled in Translation: Reconsidering Imagined Indigenous ‘Communities’ in Post-disaster Taiwan Settings.” Indigenous Peoples 12(1): 71-85.\nInternational Strategy for Disaster Reduction, 2006, “Background Paper for a Consultative Meeting on a ‘Global Network of NGOs for Community Resilience to Disasters’.” Available at\nhttps://www.unisdr.org/2008/partner-netw/ngos/meeting1-october-2006/NGOs_and_DRR_Background_Paper.pdf\nIslam, M. Rezaul and William J. Morgan, 2012, “Non-Governmental Organizations in Bangladesh: Their Contribution to Social Capital Development and Community Empowerment.” Community Development Journal 47(3): 369-385.\nIloka, Nnamdi G., 2016, “Indigenous Knowledge for Disaster Risk Reduction: An African Perspective.” Jamba: Journal of Disaster Risk Studies 8(1): 1-7.\nImperiale, Angelo J. and Frank Vanclay, 2019, “Command-and-Control, Emergency Powers, and the Failure to Observe United Nations Disaster Management Principles Following the 2009 L`Aquila Earthquake.” International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction No.36: 1-14.\nJoshi, Abhay and Misa Aoki, 2014, “The Role of Social Capital and Public Policy in Disaster Recovery: A Case Study of Tamil Nadu State, India.” International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction No.7: 100-108.\nKulatunga, Udayangani, 2010, “Impact of Culture towards Disaster Risk Reduction.” International Journal of Strategic Property Management 14(4): 304-313.\nKenneya, Christine and Suzanne Phibbsb, 2014, “Shakes, Rattles and Roll Outs: The Untold Story of Māori Engagement with Community Recovery, Social Resilience and Urban Sustainability in Christchurch, New Zealand.” Procedia Economics and Finance No.18:754-762.\nKobylarek, Aleksander, 2018, “Science as A Bridge. Science in Action.” Journal of Education Culture and Society 9(2): 5-8.\nLatour, Bruno, 1987, Science in Action: How to Follow Scientists and Engineers through Society. Cambridge: Harvard University.\nLi, Tania Murray, 2005, “Beyond ‘the State’ and Failed Schemes.” American Anthropologist 107(3): 383-394.\nLi, Tania Murray, 2007, The Will to Improve: Governmentality, Development, and the Practice of Politics, London: Duke University.\nLo, Alex Y. and Lewis T. O. Cheung, 2016, “Geographies of Social Capital: Catastrophe Experience, Risk Perception, and the Transformation of Social Space in Postearthquake Resettlements in Sichuan, China.” Annals of the American Association of Geographers 106(4): 874-890.\nManyena, Siambabala Bernard, 2006, “The Concept of Resilience Revisited.” Disasters 30(4): 434-450.\nMcEntire, David A., Colleen Gilmore Crocker MPH, and Ekong J. Peters, 2010, “Addressing Vulnerability through an Integrated Approach.” International Journal of Disaster Resilience in the Built Environment 1(1): 50-64.\nManyena, Siambabala Bernard, Geoff O`Brien, Phil O`Keefe, and Joanne Rose, 2011, “Disaster Resilience: A Bounce Back or Bounce Forward Ability?” Local Environment 16(5): 417-424.\nManyena, Siambabala Bernard, 2014, “Disaster Resilience: A Question of ‘Multiple Faces’ and ‘Multiple Spaces’?” International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction No.8: 1-9.\nMavridis, Dimitris, 2015, “Ethnic Diversity and Social Capital in Indonesia.” World Development 67: 376-395.\nOliver-Smith, Anthony, 1996, “Anthropological Research on Hazards and Disasters.” Annual Review of Anthropology No.25: 303-328.\nOliver-Smith, Anthony, 2004, Theorizing Vulnerability in a Globalized World: A Political Ecological Perspective. In Mapping Vulnerability: Disasters, Development, and People, edited by Greg Bankoff, Georg Frerks, and Dorothea Hilhorst. London: Earthscan. Pp.10-24.\nPandey, Bishnu H., and Kenji Okazaki, 2005, “Community Based Disaster Management: Empowering Communities to Cope with Disaster Risks.” Available at https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Community-Based-Disaster-Management-%3A-Empowering-to-Pandey-Okazaki/b76c55e5d2b32d900aa765e4aefe01540ba6cffa#paper-header\nPerry, Ronald W., 2006, What is a Disaster. In Handbook of Disaster Research, edited by Havidan Rodríguez, Enrico L. Quarantelli, and Russell R. Dynes. Berlin: Springer Verlag. Pp. 1-15.\nPutnam, Robert D., 2007, “E Pluribus Unum: Diversity and Community in the Twenty-first Century The 2006 Johan Skytte Prize Lecture.” Scandinavian Political Studies 30(2): 137-174.\nPerry, Ronald W., 2018, Defining Disasters: An Evolving Concept. In Handbook of Disaster Research, edited by Havidan Rodríguez, William Donner, and Joseph E. Trainor. Cham: Springer Nature. Pp. 3-22.\nQuarantelli, E. L. and R. R. Dynes, 1977, “Response to Social Crisis and Disaster.” Annual Review of Sociology 3(1): 23-49.\nRose, Nikolas, 1999, Powers of Freedom: Reframing Political Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.\nRose, Nikolas, Pat O’Malley, and Mariana Valverde, 2009, “Governmentality.” Legal Studies Research Paper No.09/94: 1-32.\nRahm, Laura, 2019, Gender-Biased Sex Selection in South Korea, India and Vietnam: Assessing the Influence of Public Policy. Cham: Springer Nature.\nRumbach, Andrew and Dolores Foley, 2014, “Indigenous Institutions and Their Role in Disaster Risk Reduction and Resilience: Evidence from the 2009 Tsunami in American Samoa.” Ecology and Society 19(1): 1-9.\nSchneider, Saundra K., 1992, “Governmental Response to Disasters: The Conflict between Bureaucratic Procedures and Emergent Norms.” Public Administration Review 52(2): 135-145.\nShirley, Mary M., 2008, Institutions and Development. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.\nSubedi, Jishnu, 2009, Indigenous Knowledge of Housing and Disaster Risk Reduction. In Indigenous Knowledge and Disaster Risk Reduction: from Practice to Policy, edited by Rajib shaw, Anshu Sharma, and Yukiko Takeuchi. New York: Nova Science Publishers.\nSökefeld, Martin, 2011, “Exploring the Link between Natural Disasters and Politics: the Case Studies of Pakistan and Peru?” Scrutiny No.5/6: 1-32.\nScannell, Leila, Robin S. Cox, Sarah Chisholm Fletcher, 2017, “Place-Based Loss and Resilience among Disaster-affected Youth.” Journal of Community Psychology 45(7): 859-876.\nTakeda, Margaret B. and Marilyn M. Helms, 2006, “‘Bureaucracy, Meet Catastrophe’ Analysis of the Tsunami Disaster Relief Efforts and Their Implications for Global Emergency Governance.” International Journal of Public Sector Management 19(2): 204-217.\nUNESCO, 2003, Convention for the Safeguarding of the Intangible Cultural Heritage, Available at http://www.unesco.org/culture/ich/index.php\nUnited Nations International Strategy for Disaster Reduction, 2015, Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction 2015-2030, 1st ed. Available at https://www.preventionweb.net/files/43291_sendaiframeworkfordrren.pdf\nWoolcock, Michael and Deepa Narayan, 2000, “Social Capital: Implications for Development Theory, Research, and Policy.” World Bank Research Observer 15(2): 225-249.\nWebb, Gary R., 2007, “The Sociology of Disaster.” In 21st Century Sociology , edited by Clifton D. Bryant and Dennis L. Peck. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications. Pp. 1-16.\nWilliams, Terry and Hardison, Preston, 2013, “Culture, Law, Risk and Governance: Contexts of Traditional Knowledge in Climate Change Adaptation.” Climatic Change No.120: 531-544.\nWolbers, Jeroen, Julie Ferguson, Peter Groenewegen, Femke Mulder, and Kees Boersma, 2016, “Two Faces of Disaster Response: Transcending the Dichotomy of Control and Collaboration during the Nepal Earthquake Relief Operation.” International Journal of Mass Emergencies and Disasters 34(3): 419-438.\nWebb, Gary R., 2018, The Cultural Turn in Disaster Research: Understanding Resilience and Vulnerability Through the Lens of Culture. In Handbook of Disaster Research, edited by Havidan Rodríguez, William Donner, and Joseph E. Trainor. Cham: Springer Nature. Pp.109-121.\nWorld Economic Forum, 2018, The Global Risks Report 2018, 13th ed. Available at http://wef.ch/risks2018\n\n中文部分\nLatour, Bruno著，劉文旋、鄭開譯，2005，《科學在行動：怎樣在社會中跟隨科學家和工程師》。北京：東方出版社。\nMerriam, Sharan B. and Elizabeth J. Tisdell著，邱炳坤等譯，2018，《質性研究:設計與施作指南》。臺北：五南。\nScott, James C.著，王曉毅譯，2019，《國家的視角：那些試圖改善人類狀況的項目是如何失敗的》。北京：社會科學文獻。\nYin, Robert K.著，尚榮安譯，2001，《個案研究法》。臺北：弘智文化。\nZolli, Andrew and Ann Marie Healy著，李振昌譯，2012，《恢復力》。臺北：商周。\n王增勇，2010，〈災後重建中的助人關係與原住民主體原住民要回到誰的家？〉。《臺灣社會研究季刊》78：437-449。\n亞磊絲．泰吉華坦，2007，《認識臺灣原住民族充滿藝術氣息的民族—魯凱族》。臺北：臺灣原住民族文化產業發展協會。\n台邦．撒沙勒，2012，〈災難、遷村與社會脆弱性：古茶波安的例子〉。《臺灣人類學刊》10(1)：51-92。\n行政院莫拉克颱風災後重建推動委員會，2012a，《愛與希望耀動生命力：莫拉克颱風災後重建3周年成果彙編（上）》。高雄：行政院莫拉克颱風災後重建推動委員會。\n行政院莫拉克颱風災後重建推動委員會，2012b，《愛與希望耀動生命力：莫拉克颱風災後重建3周年成果彙編（下）》。高雄：行政院莫拉克颱風災後重建推動委員會。\n行政院莫拉克颱風災後重建推動委員會，2014a，《莫拉克颱風災後重建5周年成果彙編》。高雄：行政院莫拉克颱風災後重建推動委員會。\n行政院莫拉克颱風災後重建推動委員會，2014b，《創新協力重建永續家園》。高雄：行政院莫拉克颱風災後重建推動委員會。\n何欣潔，2013，《在永久屋理想家：莫拉克災後三年，「永久屋」與人的故事》。臺中：莫拉克獨立新聞網。\n吳嘉苓，2015，〈訪談法〉。收錄於瞿海源等編，《社會及行為科學研究法：質性研究法》。臺北：東華。頁33-62。\n范麗娟，1992，〈深度訪談〉。收錄於謝臥龍等編，《質性研究》。臺北：心理。頁81-128。\n徐惠娟，2014，《災後產業重建發展之探討—以禮納里部落為例》。屏東：大仁科技大學文化創意產業研究所碩士論文。\n財團法人張榮發基金會，〈臺糖長榮酒店輔導禮納里產業發展成果報告書〉。財團法人張榮發基金會（臺北），執行期間2012年8 月至2013年9月。（未出版）\n陳雨嵐，2004，《臺灣的原住民》。臺北：遠足文化。\n陳永芳，2017，〈災前的災後復原重建計畫〉。收錄於王价巨等編，《災害管理：13堂專業的必修課程》。臺北：五南。頁 289-328。\n黃詩涵，2007，《社區總體營造的集體行動永續性：橙花鄉明星社區的目標發展與政府介入的政策角色》。嘉義：國立中正大學政治研究所碩士論文。\n黃智慧，2011，〈八八災後原住民族文化守護：理念與實務之落差〉。收錄於謝仕淵等編，《走入歷史田野系列叢書：行腳西拉雅》。臺北：國立臺灣歷史博物館。頁 131-152。\n湯京平、簡秀昭、張華，2013，〈參與式治理和正義的永續性：比較兩岸原住民發展政策的制度創意〉。《人文及社會科學集刊》25(3)：457-483。\n湯京平，2015，〈個案研究〉。收錄於瞿海源等編，《社會及行為科學研究法：質性研究法》。臺北：東華。頁249-280。\n達西烏拉彎．畢馬，2002，《臺灣的原住民—排灣族》。臺北：台原。\n楊弘任，2007，《社區如何動起來：黑珍珠之鄉的派系、在地師傅與社區總體營造》。新北：左岸文化。\n楊弘任，2010，〈專家系統下的地方知識：嘉邑行善團的造橋實作〉。《科技醫療與社會》(10)：129-189。\n楊弘任，2011，〈何謂在地性？從地方知識與在地範疇出發〉。《思與言》49(4)：5-29。\n潘淑滿，2003，《質性研究：理論與應用》，第三版。臺北：心理。\n謝祿宜、李祈恩，2019，〈災害安置復原中的組織工作與重建方案之形成〉。收錄於謝祿宜等編，《非營利組織災害援助服務：從零開始》。臺北：新學林。頁 71-82。\n\n G0099261501 doi:10.6814/NCCU202001723 https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw//handle/140.119/132077 外部援助文化轉譯傳統制度社區營造 External Aid Cultural Mediation Indigenous Institutions Community-Building thesis 2020 ftchengchi https://doi.org/10.6814/NCCU202001723 2024-08-05T14:55:32Z 博士國立政治大學國家發展研究所 99261501 為什麼那些具備善意的外援性災後重建方案，經常面臨失敗的結果，尤其涉及跨文化的援助工作，可能讓原住民的「脆弱性」面臨更加惡化的問題？類似錯誤迄今仍不斷地在世界各地發生，臺灣也不例外。由於災難治理分為備災、救援、恢復與減災四個階段，其中救援與恢復最需要政府採取立即的應變措施，以指揮控制途徑執行由上而下的干預措施，迅速動員各方資源共同加入災後重建的工作，尤其依賴非政府組織的參與，導致政府官員、技術官僚或外部專家對於以現代化的方式執行災後重建工作具有共識：他們相信西方發展是災後重建最容易達到的捷徑，卻忽略被重建者獨特的在地文化與傳統制度特徵，造成重建者與被重建者在進行災後重建的互動中，與在地需求產生重大落差。而這樣的落差可以透過什麼樣的方式處理，讓重建者與被重建者在災後重建的供應與需求能夠被共同理解，不再只是對彼此的不滿與抱怨，而是匯集一起才有辦法提高災後重建的效果，透過屏東禮納里部落案例的呈現，相信可以帶給我們一些省思與啟發。 It is noteworthy that the many post-disaster reconstruction projects, though in good intention, led to unsatisfactory results. It was especially the case when the external aids were transferred to indigenous peoples with substantial cultural difference. Given the facts that indigenous communities often locate in geologically sensitive places and thus be more vulnerable to natural disasters and that reconstruction demands multiple resources, closing the cultural gap is essential to improve the governing performance. By examining the successful case of the Rinari Tribe of Pingtung, Taiwan, this dissertation demonstrates the vital role of “cultural mediators” by non-profit organizations in the tribe-rebuilding process. The mediators not only translate the value system and preference of the beneficiaries to the donators but also help the indigenous peoples to better integrate into the greater social and economic systems in the community-rebuilding process. This research offers insights on disaster relief politics and provides essential policy guidance for external engagement in the disaster governance in the context with great cultural diversity. 目錄\n謝辭 I\n摘要 III\nABSTRACT V\n第一章緒論 1\n第一節研究背景 1\n第二節研究動機與目的 6\n第三節章節安排 11\n第二章外部援助、文化轉譯與傳統制度 13\n第一節災害脆弱性與外部援助的主流地位 13\n第二節權力衝突、文化轉譯與傳統制度 24\n第三章研究設計 35\n第一節研究架構的演變與修正 35\n第二節研究方法與資料蒐集 40\n第三節個案選擇與研究範圍 45\n第四章屏東禮納里部落案例 49\n第一節背景 49\n第二節遷村搶址衝突爆發？傳統制度化解政府失靈危機 56\n第三節轉譯、跨部落溝通與共識凝聚 62\n第四節外部援助退場與禮納里部落自主生存能量的展現 87\n第五章案例分析 91\n第一節轉譯與衝突：現實世界上充斥著不和諧的轉譯經驗 91\n第二節文化轉譯機制的設計與功能 95\n第三節理想的轉譯：文化轉譯的訣竅 101\n第六章結論 ... Thesis Arctic National Chengchi University Institutional Repository (NCCUIR)

外部援助、文化轉譯與傳統制度：莫拉克災後屏東禮納里部落重建經驗

Similar Items