National intellectual capital: Comparison of the Nordic Countries

Purpose – This study proposes a model to measure national intellectual capital that can be easily replicated for trend analysis. Key dimensions include human capital, market capital, process capital, renewal capital, and financial capital. Design/methodology/approach – With longitudinal data spannin...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of Intellectual Capital
Main Authors: 林月雲, Leif Edvinsson
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: 2008
Subjects:
Online Access:http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw//handle/140.119/29388
http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/bitstream/140.119/29388/1/46.pdf
id ftchengchi:oai:http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/:140.119/29389
record_format openpolar
spelling ftchengchi:oai:http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/:140.119/29389 2023-05-15T16:50:46+02:00 National intellectual capital: Comparison of the Nordic Countries 林月雲 Leif Edvinsson 2008 670331 bytes 670136 bytes application/pdf http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw//handle/140.119/29388 http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/bitstream/140.119/29388/1/46.pdf en_US eng Journal of Intellectual Capital, 9(4), 525-545 DOI:10.1108/14691930810913140 article 2008 ftchengchi https://doi.org/10.1108/14691930810913140 2015-12-04T01:21:56Z Purpose – This study proposes a model to measure national intellectual capital that can be easily replicated for trend analysis. Key dimensions include human capital, market capital, process capital, renewal capital, and financial capital. Design/methodology/approach – With longitudinal data spanning the period from 1994 to 2005, this study compares the national intellectual capital of 40 countries based on an IC map of 29 indicators. Findings – The overall intellectual capital ranking of the five Nordic countries is: 1 Sweden, 2 Finland, (3 Switzerland), 4 Denmark, (5 USA), 6 Norway, and 7 Iceland in the 40-country list. Practical implications – The results confirm the general perception that the Nordic countries have a high degree of national intellectual capital. The research findings clarify the status of national intellectual capital of the Nordic countries, thereby providing valuable information for stakeholders and policy makers to formulate effective strategies for building sustainable national competitiveness. In order to do this, it is necessary to elaborate on the proposed IC framework and to gather relevant and valid IC indicators. Originality/value – The results of this study can provide a map for the Nordic countries – and other countries – as they prepare for future challenges, such as those associated with globalization and its implications on potential wealth creation. A deeper study of why and how might be a part of forthcoming studies. Article in Journal/Newspaper Iceland National Chengchi University Institutional Repository (NCCUIR) Norway Journal of Intellectual Capital 9 4 525 545
institution Open Polar
collection National Chengchi University Institutional Repository (NCCUIR)
op_collection_id ftchengchi
language English
description Purpose – This study proposes a model to measure national intellectual capital that can be easily replicated for trend analysis. Key dimensions include human capital, market capital, process capital, renewal capital, and financial capital. Design/methodology/approach – With longitudinal data spanning the period from 1994 to 2005, this study compares the national intellectual capital of 40 countries based on an IC map of 29 indicators. Findings – The overall intellectual capital ranking of the five Nordic countries is: 1 Sweden, 2 Finland, (3 Switzerland), 4 Denmark, (5 USA), 6 Norway, and 7 Iceland in the 40-country list. Practical implications – The results confirm the general perception that the Nordic countries have a high degree of national intellectual capital. The research findings clarify the status of national intellectual capital of the Nordic countries, thereby providing valuable information for stakeholders and policy makers to formulate effective strategies for building sustainable national competitiveness. In order to do this, it is necessary to elaborate on the proposed IC framework and to gather relevant and valid IC indicators. Originality/value – The results of this study can provide a map for the Nordic countries – and other countries – as they prepare for future challenges, such as those associated with globalization and its implications on potential wealth creation. A deeper study of why and how might be a part of forthcoming studies.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author 林月雲
Leif Edvinsson
spellingShingle 林月雲
Leif Edvinsson
National intellectual capital: Comparison of the Nordic Countries
author_facet 林月雲
Leif Edvinsson
author_sort 林月雲
title National intellectual capital: Comparison of the Nordic Countries
title_short National intellectual capital: Comparison of the Nordic Countries
title_full National intellectual capital: Comparison of the Nordic Countries
title_fullStr National intellectual capital: Comparison of the Nordic Countries
title_full_unstemmed National intellectual capital: Comparison of the Nordic Countries
title_sort national intellectual capital: comparison of the nordic countries
publishDate 2008
url http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw//handle/140.119/29388
http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/bitstream/140.119/29388/1/46.pdf
geographic Norway
geographic_facet Norway
genre Iceland
genre_facet Iceland
op_relation Journal of Intellectual Capital, 9(4), 525-545
DOI:10.1108/14691930810913140
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1108/14691930810913140
container_title Journal of Intellectual Capital
container_volume 9
container_issue 4
container_start_page 525
op_container_end_page 545
_version_ 1766040891420573696