Selection of cooling fluid for an organic Rankine cycle unit recovering heat on a container ship sailing in the Arctic region

As Arctic sea ice coverage declines it is expected that marine traffic could increase in this northern region due to shorter routes. Navigating in the Arctic offers opportunities and challenges for waste heat recovery systems (WHRS). Lower temperatures require larger heating power on board, hence a...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Energy
Main Authors: Fuente, Santiago Suárezde la, Larsen, Ulrik, Pierobon, L., Kærn, Martin R., Haglind, Fredrik, Greig, Alistair
Language:unknown
Published: 2017
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2017.09.125
https://research.chalmers.se/en/publication/8dab823b-5898-4e2c-a078-783f7d5bea27
id ftchalmersuniv:oai:research.chalmers.se:501326
record_format openpolar
spelling ftchalmersuniv:oai:research.chalmers.se:501326 2023-05-15T14:38:17+02:00 Selection of cooling fluid for an organic Rankine cycle unit recovering heat on a container ship sailing in the Arctic region Fuente, Santiago Suárezde la Larsen, Ulrik Pierobon, L. Kærn, Martin R. Haglind, Fredrik Greig, Alistair 2017 text https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2017.09.125 https://research.chalmers.se/en/publication/8dab823b-5898-4e2c-a078-783f7d5bea27 unknown http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2017.09.125 https://research.chalmers.se/en/publication/8dab823b-5898-4e2c-a078-783f7d5bea27 Energy Engineering Vehicle Engineering Organic Rankine cycle Arctic shipping Waste heat recovery Condensers CO2 emissions 2017 ftchalmersuniv https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2017.09.125 2022-12-11T07:18:08Z As Arctic sea ice coverage declines it is expected that marine traffic could increase in this northern region due to shorter routes. Navigating in the Arctic offers opportunities and challenges for waste heat recovery systems (WHRS). Lower temperatures require larger heating power on board, hence a larger demand for waste heat usage, to cover services and maintaining on board spaces temperatures. However, a lower heat rejection temperature increases the WHRS thermal efficiency. The air temperature for the Arctic route selected is colder than that of the seawater, opening the opportunity of having air as coolant. This paper explores the use of two different coolants, air and seawater, for an organic Rankine cycle (ORC) unit using the available waste heat in the scavenge air system of a container ship navigating in Arctic Circle. Using a two-step single objective optimisation process, detailed models of air and seawater heat exchangers are evaluated as the WHRS condensers. The results suggest that an ORC unit using R1233zd(E) as its working fluid coupled with seawater as its coolant is the preferable option to reduce CO2 emissions. Using the ambient air as the coolant while a less effective option could be cheaper to instal Other/Unknown Material Arctic Sea ice Chalmers University of Technology: Chalmers research Arctic Energy 141 975 990
institution Open Polar
collection Chalmers University of Technology: Chalmers research
op_collection_id ftchalmersuniv
language unknown
topic Energy Engineering
Vehicle Engineering
Organic Rankine cycle Arctic shipping Waste heat recovery Condensers CO2 emissions
spellingShingle Energy Engineering
Vehicle Engineering
Organic Rankine cycle Arctic shipping Waste heat recovery Condensers CO2 emissions
Fuente, Santiago Suárezde la
Larsen, Ulrik
Pierobon, L.
Kærn, Martin R.
Haglind, Fredrik
Greig, Alistair
Selection of cooling fluid for an organic Rankine cycle unit recovering heat on a container ship sailing in the Arctic region
topic_facet Energy Engineering
Vehicle Engineering
Organic Rankine cycle Arctic shipping Waste heat recovery Condensers CO2 emissions
description As Arctic sea ice coverage declines it is expected that marine traffic could increase in this northern region due to shorter routes. Navigating in the Arctic offers opportunities and challenges for waste heat recovery systems (WHRS). Lower temperatures require larger heating power on board, hence a larger demand for waste heat usage, to cover services and maintaining on board spaces temperatures. However, a lower heat rejection temperature increases the WHRS thermal efficiency. The air temperature for the Arctic route selected is colder than that of the seawater, opening the opportunity of having air as coolant. This paper explores the use of two different coolants, air and seawater, for an organic Rankine cycle (ORC) unit using the available waste heat in the scavenge air system of a container ship navigating in Arctic Circle. Using a two-step single objective optimisation process, detailed models of air and seawater heat exchangers are evaluated as the WHRS condensers. The results suggest that an ORC unit using R1233zd(E) as its working fluid coupled with seawater as its coolant is the preferable option to reduce CO2 emissions. Using the ambient air as the coolant while a less effective option could be cheaper to instal
author Fuente, Santiago Suárezde la
Larsen, Ulrik
Pierobon, L.
Kærn, Martin R.
Haglind, Fredrik
Greig, Alistair
author_facet Fuente, Santiago Suárezde la
Larsen, Ulrik
Pierobon, L.
Kærn, Martin R.
Haglind, Fredrik
Greig, Alistair
author_sort Fuente, Santiago Suárezde la
title Selection of cooling fluid for an organic Rankine cycle unit recovering heat on a container ship sailing in the Arctic region
title_short Selection of cooling fluid for an organic Rankine cycle unit recovering heat on a container ship sailing in the Arctic region
title_full Selection of cooling fluid for an organic Rankine cycle unit recovering heat on a container ship sailing in the Arctic region
title_fullStr Selection of cooling fluid for an organic Rankine cycle unit recovering heat on a container ship sailing in the Arctic region
title_full_unstemmed Selection of cooling fluid for an organic Rankine cycle unit recovering heat on a container ship sailing in the Arctic region
title_sort selection of cooling fluid for an organic rankine cycle unit recovering heat on a container ship sailing in the arctic region
publishDate 2017
url https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2017.09.125
https://research.chalmers.se/en/publication/8dab823b-5898-4e2c-a078-783f7d5bea27
geographic Arctic
geographic_facet Arctic
genre Arctic
Sea ice
genre_facet Arctic
Sea ice
op_relation http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2017.09.125
https://research.chalmers.se/en/publication/8dab823b-5898-4e2c-a078-783f7d5bea27
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2017.09.125
container_title Energy
container_volume 141
container_start_page 975
op_container_end_page 990
_version_ 1766310393924288512