Measuring and modeling thermal conductivity of gas hydrate-bearing sand
Effective thermal conductivity (ETC) of both tetrahydrofuran (THF) and methane hydrate-bearing sandy porous media was measured by the Hot Disk Thermal Constant Analyser. Thermal conductivity of methane hydrate is 0.575 W m(-1) K-1 at 0degreesC and 6.6 MPa (methane gas pressure), which is close to TH...
| Published in: | Journal of Geophysical Research |
|---|---|
| Main Authors: | , |
| Format: | Article in Journal/Newspaper |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
2005
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://ir.giec.ac.cn/handle/344007/10221 https://doi.org/10.1029/2004JB003314 |
| Summary: | Effective thermal conductivity (ETC) of both tetrahydrofuran (THF) and methane hydrate-bearing sandy porous media was measured by the Hot Disk Thermal Constant Analyser. Thermal conductivity of methane hydrate is 0.575 W m(-1) K-1 at 0degreesC and 6.6 MPa (methane gas pressure), which is close to THF hydrate's 0.51 W m(-1) K-1 at 0degreesC and 0.1 MPa (atmosphere pressure). However, the measured 1 W m(-1) K-1 ETC of methane hydrate-bearing sand is significantly lower than that of THF hydrate-bearing sand at similar to2 W m(-1) K-1. This is because the methane hydrate formed with a sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) solution in sand at our laboratory has a "wall creeping'' growth characteristic and consequently a large part of the pores were filled with methane free gas. ETCs of sand containing gas hydrates were also calculated using a renormalization method. The process involves sample partitioning, labeling, initial value assignments, and renormalization calculations. A Monte Carlo analysis was applied to sample laboratory-scale gas hydrate-bearing sand assemblies. We found that the renormalization modeling results agreed well with measured ETCs when each photo of a 1.3 mm x 1.3 mm subsample was divided into 16 or more blocks. |
|---|