Conservation gaps in traditional vegetables native to Europe and Fennoscandia

Vegetables are rich in vitamins and other micronutrients and are important crops for healthy diets and diversification of the food system, and many traditional (also termed underutilized or indigenous) species may play a role. The current study analyzed 35 vegetables with a European region of divers...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Agriculture
Main Authors: Sousa, Kauê de, Solberg, Svein Ø.
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: MDPI 2020
Subjects:
Online Access:https://hdl.handle.net/10568/108982
https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture10080340
id ftcgiar:oai:cgspace.cgiar.org:10568/108982
record_format openpolar
spelling ftcgiar:oai:cgspace.cgiar.org:10568/108982 2024-01-07T09:43:08+01:00 Conservation gaps in traditional vegetables native to Europe and Fennoscandia Sousa, Kauê de Solberg, Svein Ø. 2020-08-11T07:38:30Z 17 p. application/pdf https://hdl.handle.net/10568/108982 https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture10080340 en eng MDPI de Sousa, K.; Solberg, S.Ø. (2020) Conservation gaps in traditional vegetables native to Europe and Fennoscandia. Agriculture 10(8), 340 17 p. ISSN: 2077-0472 2077-0472 https://hdl.handle.net/10568/108982 https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture10080340 CC-BY-4.0 Open Access Agriculture crops wild plants ecosystem services genetic variation plant genetic resources distribution systems cultivos plantas silvestres ervicios de los ecosistemas Journal Article 2020 ftcgiar https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture10080340 2023-12-12T23:56:18Z Vegetables are rich in vitamins and other micronutrients and are important crops for healthy diets and diversification of the food system, and many traditional (also termed underutilized or indigenous) species may play a role. The current study analyzed 35 vegetables with a European region of diversity with the effort to map the conservation status in Fennoscandia and beyond. We mapped georeferenced occurrences and current genebank holdings based on global databases and conducted conservation gaps analysis based on representativeness scores in situ and ex situ. Out of the 35 target species, 19 got at a high priority score for further conservation initiatives, while another 14 species got a medium priority score. We identified a pattern where traditional vegetables are poorly represented in genebank holdings. This corresponds well to a lack of attention in the scientific community measured in number of published papers. Considering the grand challenges ahead in terms of climate change, population growth and demand for sustainability, traditional vegetables deserve greater attention. Our contribution is to provide a basis for conservation priorities among the identified vegetables species native to Fennoscandia. Article in Journal/Newspaper Fennoscandia CGIAR CGSpace (Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research) Agriculture 10 8 340
institution Open Polar
collection CGIAR CGSpace (Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research)
op_collection_id ftcgiar
language English
topic crops
wild plants
ecosystem services
genetic variation
plant genetic resources
distribution systems
cultivos
plantas silvestres
ervicios de los ecosistemas
spellingShingle crops
wild plants
ecosystem services
genetic variation
plant genetic resources
distribution systems
cultivos
plantas silvestres
ervicios de los ecosistemas
Sousa, Kauê de
Solberg, Svein Ø.
Conservation gaps in traditional vegetables native to Europe and Fennoscandia
topic_facet crops
wild plants
ecosystem services
genetic variation
plant genetic resources
distribution systems
cultivos
plantas silvestres
ervicios de los ecosistemas
description Vegetables are rich in vitamins and other micronutrients and are important crops for healthy diets and diversification of the food system, and many traditional (also termed underutilized or indigenous) species may play a role. The current study analyzed 35 vegetables with a European region of diversity with the effort to map the conservation status in Fennoscandia and beyond. We mapped georeferenced occurrences and current genebank holdings based on global databases and conducted conservation gaps analysis based on representativeness scores in situ and ex situ. Out of the 35 target species, 19 got at a high priority score for further conservation initiatives, while another 14 species got a medium priority score. We identified a pattern where traditional vegetables are poorly represented in genebank holdings. This corresponds well to a lack of attention in the scientific community measured in number of published papers. Considering the grand challenges ahead in terms of climate change, population growth and demand for sustainability, traditional vegetables deserve greater attention. Our contribution is to provide a basis for conservation priorities among the identified vegetables species native to Fennoscandia.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Sousa, Kauê de
Solberg, Svein Ø.
author_facet Sousa, Kauê de
Solberg, Svein Ø.
author_sort Sousa, Kauê de
title Conservation gaps in traditional vegetables native to Europe and Fennoscandia
title_short Conservation gaps in traditional vegetables native to Europe and Fennoscandia
title_full Conservation gaps in traditional vegetables native to Europe and Fennoscandia
title_fullStr Conservation gaps in traditional vegetables native to Europe and Fennoscandia
title_full_unstemmed Conservation gaps in traditional vegetables native to Europe and Fennoscandia
title_sort conservation gaps in traditional vegetables native to europe and fennoscandia
publisher MDPI
publishDate 2020
url https://hdl.handle.net/10568/108982
https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture10080340
genre Fennoscandia
genre_facet Fennoscandia
op_source Agriculture
op_relation de Sousa, K.; Solberg, S.Ø. (2020) Conservation gaps in traditional vegetables native to Europe and Fennoscandia. Agriculture 10(8), 340 17 p. ISSN: 2077-0472
2077-0472
https://hdl.handle.net/10568/108982
https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture10080340
op_rights CC-BY-4.0
Open Access
op_doi https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture10080340
container_title Agriculture
container_volume 10
container_issue 8
container_start_page 340
_version_ 1787424396903710720