UCSB South Pole 1994 CMB anisotropy measurement constraints on open and flat-$\Lambda$ CDM cosmogonies
We analyze the 1994 UCSB South Pole CMB anisotropy data in the context of realistic open and flat-lambda CDM cosmogonies. Ignoring calibration and beamwidth uncertainties, we repeat the nominal beamwidth, flat bandpower, likelihood analyses of Gundersen (1995) for the SP94 combined Ka, Q, and (full)...
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Language: | English |
Published: |
1996
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://cds.cern.ch/record/297519 |
id |
ftcern:oai:cds.cern.ch:297519 |
---|---|
record_format |
openpolar |
spelling |
ftcern:oai:cds.cern.ch:297519 2023-05-15T18:22:14+02:00 UCSB South Pole 1994 CMB anisotropy measurement constraints on open and flat-$\Lambda$ CDM cosmogonies Ganga, K Ratra, B Gundersen, J O Sugiyama, N 1996-02-27 http://cds.cern.ch/record/297519 eng eng http://cds.cern.ch/record/297519 astro-ph/9602141 MIT-CTP-2510 RESCEU-96-5 UTAP-226 oai:cds.cern.ch:297519 Astrophysics and Astronomy 1996 ftcern 2018-07-28T02:53:42Z We analyze the 1994 UCSB South Pole CMB anisotropy data in the context of realistic open and flat-lambda CDM cosmogonies. Ignoring calibration and beamwidth uncertainties, we repeat the nominal beamwidth, flat bandpower, likelihood analyses of Gundersen (1995) for the SP94 combined Ka, Q, and (full) Ka + Q data subsets. Our results are consistent with those of G95 to within the expected numerical uncertainty. Accounting for calibration and beamwidth uncertainties, the Ka + Q data set is most consistent with the CMB anisotropy shape in \Omega_0 \sim 0.1-0.2 open models (amongst all the models we consider here), and is not as consistent with those in old (t_0 \gap 15 - 16 Gyr), high baryon density (\Omega_B \gap 0.0175h^{-2}), low density (\Omega_0 \sim 0.2 - 0.4), flat-\Lambda models. Conclusions regarding model compatibility drawn from the SP94 Ka and Q data subsets are consistent with these results. For the Ka, Q, and Ka + Q data subsets the CMB anisotropy shape in open CDM models with \Omega_0 = 0.1 -- 0.3 and 0.4 (with a larger h and lower \Omega_B), and in the flat bandpower model, ensures that these models are always within 1\sigma of the most likely low-density open model. Open models with \Omega_0 = 0.5 (with a smaller h and a larger \Omega_B), fiducial CDM, and all flat-\Lambda models we consider, are always more than 1\sigma away from the most likely low-density open model. For the Ka, Q, and Ka + Q data subsets analyzed at the nominal beamwidths, the least likely model CMB anisotropy shape is always within \sim 1.4 - 1.6\sigma of the most likely low-density open model, so the SP94 data do not rule out any of the models we consider here at the 2\sigma level. Other/Unknown Material South pole CERN Document Server (CDS) Lambda ENVELOPE(-62.983,-62.983,-64.300,-64.300) South Pole |
institution |
Open Polar |
collection |
CERN Document Server (CDS) |
op_collection_id |
ftcern |
language |
English |
topic |
Astrophysics and Astronomy |
spellingShingle |
Astrophysics and Astronomy Ganga, K Ratra, B Gundersen, J O Sugiyama, N UCSB South Pole 1994 CMB anisotropy measurement constraints on open and flat-$\Lambda$ CDM cosmogonies |
topic_facet |
Astrophysics and Astronomy |
description |
We analyze the 1994 UCSB South Pole CMB anisotropy data in the context of realistic open and flat-lambda CDM cosmogonies. Ignoring calibration and beamwidth uncertainties, we repeat the nominal beamwidth, flat bandpower, likelihood analyses of Gundersen (1995) for the SP94 combined Ka, Q, and (full) Ka + Q data subsets. Our results are consistent with those of G95 to within the expected numerical uncertainty. Accounting for calibration and beamwidth uncertainties, the Ka + Q data set is most consistent with the CMB anisotropy shape in \Omega_0 \sim 0.1-0.2 open models (amongst all the models we consider here), and is not as consistent with those in old (t_0 \gap 15 - 16 Gyr), high baryon density (\Omega_B \gap 0.0175h^{-2}), low density (\Omega_0 \sim 0.2 - 0.4), flat-\Lambda models. Conclusions regarding model compatibility drawn from the SP94 Ka and Q data subsets are consistent with these results. For the Ka, Q, and Ka + Q data subsets the CMB anisotropy shape in open CDM models with \Omega_0 = 0.1 -- 0.3 and 0.4 (with a larger h and lower \Omega_B), and in the flat bandpower model, ensures that these models are always within 1\sigma of the most likely low-density open model. Open models with \Omega_0 = 0.5 (with a smaller h and a larger \Omega_B), fiducial CDM, and all flat-\Lambda models we consider, are always more than 1\sigma away from the most likely low-density open model. For the Ka, Q, and Ka + Q data subsets analyzed at the nominal beamwidths, the least likely model CMB anisotropy shape is always within \sim 1.4 - 1.6\sigma of the most likely low-density open model, so the SP94 data do not rule out any of the models we consider here at the 2\sigma level. |
author |
Ganga, K Ratra, B Gundersen, J O Sugiyama, N |
author_facet |
Ganga, K Ratra, B Gundersen, J O Sugiyama, N |
author_sort |
Ganga, K |
title |
UCSB South Pole 1994 CMB anisotropy measurement constraints on open and flat-$\Lambda$ CDM cosmogonies |
title_short |
UCSB South Pole 1994 CMB anisotropy measurement constraints on open and flat-$\Lambda$ CDM cosmogonies |
title_full |
UCSB South Pole 1994 CMB anisotropy measurement constraints on open and flat-$\Lambda$ CDM cosmogonies |
title_fullStr |
UCSB South Pole 1994 CMB anisotropy measurement constraints on open and flat-$\Lambda$ CDM cosmogonies |
title_full_unstemmed |
UCSB South Pole 1994 CMB anisotropy measurement constraints on open and flat-$\Lambda$ CDM cosmogonies |
title_sort |
ucsb south pole 1994 cmb anisotropy measurement constraints on open and flat-$\lambda$ cdm cosmogonies |
publishDate |
1996 |
url |
http://cds.cern.ch/record/297519 |
long_lat |
ENVELOPE(-62.983,-62.983,-64.300,-64.300) |
geographic |
Lambda South Pole |
geographic_facet |
Lambda South Pole |
genre |
South pole |
genre_facet |
South pole |
op_relation |
http://cds.cern.ch/record/297519 astro-ph/9602141 MIT-CTP-2510 RESCEU-96-5 UTAP-226 oai:cds.cern.ch:297519 |
_version_ |
1766201618176409600 |