Satellite-based evaluation of AeroCom model bias in biomass burning regions

International audience Global models are widely used to simulate biomass burning aerosol (BBA). Exhaustive evaluations on model representation of aerosol distributions and properties are fundamental to assess health and climate impacts of BBA. Here we conducted a comprehensive comparison of Aerosol...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
Main Authors: Zhong, Qirui, Schutgens, Nick, van der Werf, Guido, van Noije, Twan, Tsigaridis, Kostas, Bauer, Susanne E., Mielonen, Tero, Kirkevåg, Alf, Seland, Øyvind, Kokkola, Harri, Checa-Garcia, Ramiro, Neubauer, David, Kipling, Zak, Matsui, Hitoshi, Ginoux, Paul, Takemura, Toshihiko, Le Sager, Philippe, Rémy, Samuel, Bian, Huisheng, Chin, Mian, Zhang, Kai, Zhu, Jialei, Tsyro, Svetlana G., Curci, Gabriele, Protonotariou, Anna, Johnson, Ben, Penner, Joyce E., Bellouin, Nicolas, Skeie, Ragnhild B., Myhre, Gunnar
Other Authors: Laboratoire des Sciences du Climat et de l'Environnement Gif-sur-Yvette (LSCE), Université de Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines (UVSQ)-Institut national des sciences de l'Univers (INSU - CNRS)-Université Paris-Saclay-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Direction de Recherche Fondamentale (CEA) (DRF (CEA)), Commissariat à l'énergie atomique et aux énergies alternatives (CEA)-Commissariat à l'énergie atomique et aux énergies alternatives (CEA)
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: HAL CCSD 2022
Subjects:
Online Access:https://insu.hal.science/insu-03824365
https://insu.hal.science/insu-03824365/document
https://insu.hal.science/insu-03824365/file/acp-22-11009-2022.pdf
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-11009-2022
id ftceafr:oai:HAL:insu-03824365v1
record_format openpolar
institution Open Polar
collection HAL-CEA (Commissariat à l'énergie atomique et aux énergies alternatives)
op_collection_id ftceafr
language English
topic [SDU]Sciences of the Universe [physics]
spellingShingle [SDU]Sciences of the Universe [physics]
Zhong, Qirui
Schutgens, Nick
van der Werf, Guido
van Noije, Twan
Tsigaridis, Kostas
Bauer, Susanne E.
Mielonen, Tero
Kirkevåg, Alf
Seland, Øyvind
Kokkola, Harri
Checa-Garcia, Ramiro
Neubauer, David
Kipling, Zak
Matsui, Hitoshi
Ginoux, Paul
Takemura, Toshihiko
Le Sager, Philippe
Rémy, Samuel
Bian, Huisheng
Chin, Mian
Zhang, Kai
Zhu, Jialei
Tsyro, Svetlana G.
Curci, Gabriele
Protonotariou, Anna
Johnson, Ben
Penner, Joyce E.
Bellouin, Nicolas
Skeie, Ragnhild B.
Myhre, Gunnar
Satellite-based evaluation of AeroCom model bias in biomass burning regions
topic_facet [SDU]Sciences of the Universe [physics]
description International audience Global models are widely used to simulate biomass burning aerosol (BBA). Exhaustive evaluations on model representation of aerosol distributions and properties are fundamental to assess health and climate impacts of BBA. Here we conducted a comprehensive comparison of Aerosol Comparisons between Observations and Models (AeroCom) project model simulations with satellite observations. A total of 59 runs by 18 models from three AeroCom Phase-III experiments (i.e., biomass burning emissions, CTRL16, and CTRL19) and 14 satellite products of aerosols were used in the study. Aerosol optical depth (AOD) at 550 nm was investigated during the fire season over three key fire regions reflecting different fire dynamics (i.e., deforestation-dominated Amazon, Southern Hemisphere Africa where savannas are the key source of emissions, and boreal forest burning in boreal North America). The 14 satellite products were first evaluated against AErosol RObotic NETwork (AERONET) observations, with large uncertainties found. But these uncertainties had small impacts on the model evaluation that was dominated by modeling bias. Through a comparison with Polarization and Directionality of the Earth's Reflectances measurements with the Generalized Retrieval of Aerosol and Surface Properties algorithm (POLDER-GRASP), we found that the modeled AOD values were biased by -93 % to 152 %, with most models showing significant underestimations even for the state-of-the-art aerosol modeling techniques (i.e., CTRL19). By scaling up BBA emissions, the negative biases in modeled AOD were significantly mitigated, although it yielded only negligible improvements in the correlation between models and observations, and the spatial and temporal variations in AOD biases did not change much. For models in CTRL16 and CTRL19, the large diversity in modeled AOD was in almost equal measures caused by diversity in emissions, lifetime, and the mass extinction coefficient (MEC). We found that in the AeroCom ensemble, BBA lifetime correlated ...
author2 Laboratoire des Sciences du Climat et de l'Environnement Gif-sur-Yvette (LSCE)
Université de Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines (UVSQ)-Institut national des sciences de l'Univers (INSU - CNRS)-Université Paris-Saclay-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Direction de Recherche Fondamentale (CEA) (DRF (CEA))
Commissariat à l'énergie atomique et aux énergies alternatives (CEA)-Commissariat à l'énergie atomique et aux énergies alternatives (CEA)
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Zhong, Qirui
Schutgens, Nick
van der Werf, Guido
van Noije, Twan
Tsigaridis, Kostas
Bauer, Susanne E.
Mielonen, Tero
Kirkevåg, Alf
Seland, Øyvind
Kokkola, Harri
Checa-Garcia, Ramiro
Neubauer, David
Kipling, Zak
Matsui, Hitoshi
Ginoux, Paul
Takemura, Toshihiko
Le Sager, Philippe
Rémy, Samuel
Bian, Huisheng
Chin, Mian
Zhang, Kai
Zhu, Jialei
Tsyro, Svetlana G.
Curci, Gabriele
Protonotariou, Anna
Johnson, Ben
Penner, Joyce E.
Bellouin, Nicolas
Skeie, Ragnhild B.
Myhre, Gunnar
author_facet Zhong, Qirui
Schutgens, Nick
van der Werf, Guido
van Noije, Twan
Tsigaridis, Kostas
Bauer, Susanne E.
Mielonen, Tero
Kirkevåg, Alf
Seland, Øyvind
Kokkola, Harri
Checa-Garcia, Ramiro
Neubauer, David
Kipling, Zak
Matsui, Hitoshi
Ginoux, Paul
Takemura, Toshihiko
Le Sager, Philippe
Rémy, Samuel
Bian, Huisheng
Chin, Mian
Zhang, Kai
Zhu, Jialei
Tsyro, Svetlana G.
Curci, Gabriele
Protonotariou, Anna
Johnson, Ben
Penner, Joyce E.
Bellouin, Nicolas
Skeie, Ragnhild B.
Myhre, Gunnar
author_sort Zhong, Qirui
title Satellite-based evaluation of AeroCom model bias in biomass burning regions
title_short Satellite-based evaluation of AeroCom model bias in biomass burning regions
title_full Satellite-based evaluation of AeroCom model bias in biomass burning regions
title_fullStr Satellite-based evaluation of AeroCom model bias in biomass burning regions
title_full_unstemmed Satellite-based evaluation of AeroCom model bias in biomass burning regions
title_sort satellite-based evaluation of aerocom model bias in biomass burning regions
publisher HAL CCSD
publishDate 2022
url https://insu.hal.science/insu-03824365
https://insu.hal.science/insu-03824365/document
https://insu.hal.science/insu-03824365/file/acp-22-11009-2022.pdf
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-11009-2022
genre Aerosol Robotic Network
genre_facet Aerosol Robotic Network
op_source ISSN: 1680-7316
EISSN: 1680-7324
Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
https://insu.hal.science/insu-03824365
Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 2022, 22, pp.11009-11032. ⟨10.5194/acp-22-11009-2022⟩
op_relation info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.5194/acp-22-11009-2022
insu-03824365
https://insu.hal.science/insu-03824365
https://insu.hal.science/insu-03824365/document
https://insu.hal.science/insu-03824365/file/acp-22-11009-2022.pdf
BIBCODE: 2022ACP.2211009Z
doi:10.5194/acp-22-11009-2022
op_rights http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/
info:eu-repo/semantics/OpenAccess
op_doi https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-11009-2022
container_title Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
container_volume 22
container_issue 17
container_start_page 11009
op_container_end_page 11032
_version_ 1810447693338640384
spelling ftceafr:oai:HAL:insu-03824365v1 2024-09-15T17:35:16+00:00 Satellite-based evaluation of AeroCom model bias in biomass burning regions Zhong, Qirui Schutgens, Nick van der Werf, Guido van Noije, Twan Tsigaridis, Kostas Bauer, Susanne E. Mielonen, Tero Kirkevåg, Alf Seland, Øyvind Kokkola, Harri Checa-Garcia, Ramiro Neubauer, David Kipling, Zak Matsui, Hitoshi Ginoux, Paul Takemura, Toshihiko Le Sager, Philippe Rémy, Samuel Bian, Huisheng Chin, Mian Zhang, Kai Zhu, Jialei Tsyro, Svetlana G. Curci, Gabriele Protonotariou, Anna Johnson, Ben Penner, Joyce E. Bellouin, Nicolas Skeie, Ragnhild B. Myhre, Gunnar Laboratoire des Sciences du Climat et de l'Environnement Gif-sur-Yvette (LSCE) Université de Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines (UVSQ)-Institut national des sciences de l'Univers (INSU - CNRS)-Université Paris-Saclay-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Direction de Recherche Fondamentale (CEA) (DRF (CEA)) Commissariat à l'énergie atomique et aux énergies alternatives (CEA)-Commissariat à l'énergie atomique et aux énergies alternatives (CEA) 2022 https://insu.hal.science/insu-03824365 https://insu.hal.science/insu-03824365/document https://insu.hal.science/insu-03824365/file/acp-22-11009-2022.pdf https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-11009-2022 en eng HAL CCSD European Geosciences Union info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.5194/acp-22-11009-2022 insu-03824365 https://insu.hal.science/insu-03824365 https://insu.hal.science/insu-03824365/document https://insu.hal.science/insu-03824365/file/acp-22-11009-2022.pdf BIBCODE: 2022ACP.2211009Z doi:10.5194/acp-22-11009-2022 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/ info:eu-repo/semantics/OpenAccess ISSN: 1680-7316 EISSN: 1680-7324 Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics https://insu.hal.science/insu-03824365 Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 2022, 22, pp.11009-11032. ⟨10.5194/acp-22-11009-2022⟩ [SDU]Sciences of the Universe [physics] info:eu-repo/semantics/article Journal articles 2022 ftceafr https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-11009-2022 2024-07-22T13:09:20Z International audience Global models are widely used to simulate biomass burning aerosol (BBA). Exhaustive evaluations on model representation of aerosol distributions and properties are fundamental to assess health and climate impacts of BBA. Here we conducted a comprehensive comparison of Aerosol Comparisons between Observations and Models (AeroCom) project model simulations with satellite observations. A total of 59 runs by 18 models from three AeroCom Phase-III experiments (i.e., biomass burning emissions, CTRL16, and CTRL19) and 14 satellite products of aerosols were used in the study. Aerosol optical depth (AOD) at 550 nm was investigated during the fire season over three key fire regions reflecting different fire dynamics (i.e., deforestation-dominated Amazon, Southern Hemisphere Africa where savannas are the key source of emissions, and boreal forest burning in boreal North America). The 14 satellite products were first evaluated against AErosol RObotic NETwork (AERONET) observations, with large uncertainties found. But these uncertainties had small impacts on the model evaluation that was dominated by modeling bias. Through a comparison with Polarization and Directionality of the Earth's Reflectances measurements with the Generalized Retrieval of Aerosol and Surface Properties algorithm (POLDER-GRASP), we found that the modeled AOD values were biased by -93 % to 152 %, with most models showing significant underestimations even for the state-of-the-art aerosol modeling techniques (i.e., CTRL19). By scaling up BBA emissions, the negative biases in modeled AOD were significantly mitigated, although it yielded only negligible improvements in the correlation between models and observations, and the spatial and temporal variations in AOD biases did not change much. For models in CTRL16 and CTRL19, the large diversity in modeled AOD was in almost equal measures caused by diversity in emissions, lifetime, and the mass extinction coefficient (MEC). We found that in the AeroCom ensemble, BBA lifetime correlated ... Article in Journal/Newspaper Aerosol Robotic Network HAL-CEA (Commissariat à l'énergie atomique et aux énergies alternatives) Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics 22 17 11009 11032