How America was colonized: Linguistic evidence

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015. America was colonized by Asian migrants who moved from northeastern Siberia into North America, either coastally or by an interior route through now-submerged Beringia, and from there spread southward eventually to settle in the entire hemisphere...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Nichols, J
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: eScholarship, University of California 2015
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.escholarship.org/uc/item/94f0g00p
id ftcdlib:qt94f0g00p
record_format openpolar
spelling ftcdlib:qt94f0g00p 2023-05-15T18:49:29+02:00 How America was colonized: Linguistic evidence Nichols, J 117 - 126 2015-01-01 application/pdf http://www.escholarship.org/uc/item/94f0g00p english eng eScholarship, University of California qt94f0g00p http://www.escholarship.org/uc/item/94f0g00p public Nichols, J. (2015). How America was colonized: Linguistic evidence. In Mobility and Ancient Society in Asia and the Americas. UC Berkeley: Retrieved from: http://www.escholarship.org/uc/item/94f0g00p article 2015 ftcdlib 2018-07-13T22:55:05Z © Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015. America was colonized by Asian migrants who moved from northeastern Siberia into North America, either coastally or by an interior route through now-submerged Beringia, and from there spread southward eventually to settle in the entire hemisphere. Linguistic evidence can shed light on when colonization began; whether it was initially coastal, interior, or both; how many distinct populations were involved; and how rapidly the hemisphere was colonized. The time required to generate the historically attested number of languages and language families in the Americas can be estimated; frequencies of structural properties in areally defined linguistic populations can discriminate between populations and point to geographic origins; and attested and straightforwardly reconstructable rates of language spread can be used to estimate rates of migration and demographic spread. On the linguistic evidence, colonization must have begun before the Last Glacial Maximum. There were at least two distinct populations, perhaps corresponding to interior and coastal immigration routes, and in general, coastal immigration seems to have had a stronger and more varied impact on the linguistic population of the Americas than interior immigration did. The immigrants spread at not much over 1 km/year on average (depending on ecology), taking about 7,000 years to reach southern South America. The linguistic dates are robust and based on plentiful and carefully analyzed material, so they cannot be dismissed, although they conflict with the younger ages estimated in genetic, archaeological, and paleoclimatological work. Article in Journal/Newspaper Beringia Siberia University of California: eScholarship
institution Open Polar
collection University of California: eScholarship
op_collection_id ftcdlib
language English
description © Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015. America was colonized by Asian migrants who moved from northeastern Siberia into North America, either coastally or by an interior route through now-submerged Beringia, and from there spread southward eventually to settle in the entire hemisphere. Linguistic evidence can shed light on when colonization began; whether it was initially coastal, interior, or both; how many distinct populations were involved; and how rapidly the hemisphere was colonized. The time required to generate the historically attested number of languages and language families in the Americas can be estimated; frequencies of structural properties in areally defined linguistic populations can discriminate between populations and point to geographic origins; and attested and straightforwardly reconstructable rates of language spread can be used to estimate rates of migration and demographic spread. On the linguistic evidence, colonization must have begun before the Last Glacial Maximum. There were at least two distinct populations, perhaps corresponding to interior and coastal immigration routes, and in general, coastal immigration seems to have had a stronger and more varied impact on the linguistic population of the Americas than interior immigration did. The immigrants spread at not much over 1 km/year on average (depending on ecology), taking about 7,000 years to reach southern South America. The linguistic dates are robust and based on plentiful and carefully analyzed material, so they cannot be dismissed, although they conflict with the younger ages estimated in genetic, archaeological, and paleoclimatological work.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Nichols, J
spellingShingle Nichols, J
How America was colonized: Linguistic evidence
author_facet Nichols, J
author_sort Nichols, J
title How America was colonized: Linguistic evidence
title_short How America was colonized: Linguistic evidence
title_full How America was colonized: Linguistic evidence
title_fullStr How America was colonized: Linguistic evidence
title_full_unstemmed How America was colonized: Linguistic evidence
title_sort how america was colonized: linguistic evidence
publisher eScholarship, University of California
publishDate 2015
url http://www.escholarship.org/uc/item/94f0g00p
op_coverage 117 - 126
genre Beringia
Siberia
genre_facet Beringia
Siberia
op_source Nichols, J. (2015). How America was colonized: Linguistic evidence. In Mobility and Ancient Society in Asia and the Americas. UC Berkeley: Retrieved from: http://www.escholarship.org/uc/item/94f0g00p
op_relation qt94f0g00p
http://www.escholarship.org/uc/item/94f0g00p
op_rights public
_version_ 1766243078042025984