Response of Canada geese to a dead goose effigy

The North American Canada goose population increased at a rate of 10.5% per year, 1966 - 2001. Canada geese rank as the third most hazardous species in regards to collisions with aircraft. Sound Canada goose management tools are critical for a safer airport environment. We conducted field evaluation...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Seamans, Thomas W., Bernhardt, Glen E.
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: eScholarship, University of California 2004
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.escholarship.org/uc/item/42d5w6f0
id ftcdlib:qt42d5w6f0
record_format openpolar
spelling ftcdlib:qt42d5w6f0 2023-05-15T15:46:19+02:00 Response of Canada geese to a dead goose effigy Seamans, Thomas W. Bernhardt, Glen E. 104 - 106 2004-01-01 application/pdf http://www.escholarship.org/uc/item/42d5w6f0 english eng eScholarship, University of California qt42d5w6f0 http://www.escholarship.org/uc/item/42d5w6f0 public Seamans, Thomas W.; & Bernhardt, Glen E.(2004). Response of Canada geese to a dead goose effigy. Proceedings of the Vertebrate Pest Conference, 21(21), 104 - 106. Retrieved from: http://www.escholarship.org/uc/item/42d5w6f0 bird control Branta canadensis Canada geese deterrent effigy Life Sciences article 2004 ftcdlib 2019-06-21T22:52:18Z The North American Canada goose population increased at a rate of 10.5% per year, 1966 - 2001. Canada geese rank as the third most hazardous species in regards to collisions with aircraft. Sound Canada goose management tools are critical for a safer airport environment. We conducted field evaluations of a Canada goose effigy during the breeding season with territorial pairs and in late summer with post-fledging flocks to determine if geese were deterred by the effigy. No difference in territorial pairs was found between pretreatment and treatment periods for Canada geese when goose effigies were placed within their territories. In post-fledging flocks, the mean number of geese observed during pretreatment (74.9 ± 12.9), treatment (14.8 ± 4.5), and posttreatment (53.6 ± 14.2) periods differed (P < 0.01). There was no difference (P = 0.56) between the mean number of geese observed during a second round of 5-day pretreatment (58.7) and 5-day second round treatment (43.7) periods. By itself, the goose effigy was not effective as a Canada goose deterrent after approximately 5 days. However, this effigy may have some potential in an integrated goose control program conducted outside of the breeding season. Further evaluation of the effigy as part of an integrated Canada goose control program is recommended. Article in Journal/Newspaper Branta canadensis Canada Goose University of California: eScholarship Canada
institution Open Polar
collection University of California: eScholarship
op_collection_id ftcdlib
language English
topic bird control
Branta canadensis
Canada geese
deterrent
effigy
Life Sciences
spellingShingle bird control
Branta canadensis
Canada geese
deterrent
effigy
Life Sciences
Seamans, Thomas W.
Bernhardt, Glen E.
Response of Canada geese to a dead goose effigy
topic_facet bird control
Branta canadensis
Canada geese
deterrent
effigy
Life Sciences
description The North American Canada goose population increased at a rate of 10.5% per year, 1966 - 2001. Canada geese rank as the third most hazardous species in regards to collisions with aircraft. Sound Canada goose management tools are critical for a safer airport environment. We conducted field evaluations of a Canada goose effigy during the breeding season with territorial pairs and in late summer with post-fledging flocks to determine if geese were deterred by the effigy. No difference in territorial pairs was found between pretreatment and treatment periods for Canada geese when goose effigies were placed within their territories. In post-fledging flocks, the mean number of geese observed during pretreatment (74.9 ± 12.9), treatment (14.8 ± 4.5), and posttreatment (53.6 ± 14.2) periods differed (P < 0.01). There was no difference (P = 0.56) between the mean number of geese observed during a second round of 5-day pretreatment (58.7) and 5-day second round treatment (43.7) periods. By itself, the goose effigy was not effective as a Canada goose deterrent after approximately 5 days. However, this effigy may have some potential in an integrated goose control program conducted outside of the breeding season. Further evaluation of the effigy as part of an integrated Canada goose control program is recommended.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Seamans, Thomas W.
Bernhardt, Glen E.
author_facet Seamans, Thomas W.
Bernhardt, Glen E.
author_sort Seamans, Thomas W.
title Response of Canada geese to a dead goose effigy
title_short Response of Canada geese to a dead goose effigy
title_full Response of Canada geese to a dead goose effigy
title_fullStr Response of Canada geese to a dead goose effigy
title_full_unstemmed Response of Canada geese to a dead goose effigy
title_sort response of canada geese to a dead goose effigy
publisher eScholarship, University of California
publishDate 2004
url http://www.escholarship.org/uc/item/42d5w6f0
op_coverage 104 - 106
geographic Canada
geographic_facet Canada
genre Branta canadensis
Canada Goose
genre_facet Branta canadensis
Canada Goose
op_source Seamans, Thomas W.; & Bernhardt, Glen E.(2004). Response of Canada geese to a dead goose effigy. Proceedings of the Vertebrate Pest Conference, 21(21), 104 - 106. Retrieved from: http://www.escholarship.org/uc/item/42d5w6f0
op_relation qt42d5w6f0
http://www.escholarship.org/uc/item/42d5w6f0
op_rights public
_version_ 1766381019769864192