Evaluation of hydrologic components of community land model 4 and bias identification

© 2015 Runoff and soil moisture are two key components of the global hydrologic cycle that should be validated at local to global scales in Earth System Models (ESMs) used for climate projection. We have evaluated the runoff and surface soil moisture output by the Community Climate System Model (CCS...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation
Main Authors: Du, E, Vittorio, AD, Collins, WD
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: eScholarship, University of California 2016
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.escholarship.org/uc/item/1qg6h8z1
id ftcdlib:qt1qg6h8z1
record_format openpolar
spelling ftcdlib:qt1qg6h8z1 2023-05-15T15:15:11+02:00 Evaluation of hydrologic components of community land model 4 and bias identification Du, E Vittorio, AD Collins, WD 5 - 16 2016-06-01 application/pdf http://www.escholarship.org/uc/item/1qg6h8z1 english eng eScholarship, University of California qt1qg6h8z1 http://www.escholarship.org/uc/item/1qg6h8z1 public Du, E; Vittorio, AD; & Collins, WD. (2016). Evaluation of hydrologic components of community land model 4 and bias identification. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation, 48, 5 - 16. doi:10.1016/j.jag.2015.03.013. UC Berkeley: Retrieved from: http://www.escholarship.org/uc/item/1qg6h8z1 article 2016 ftcdlib https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jag.2015.03.013 2018-02-16T23:52:55Z © 2015 Runoff and soil moisture are two key components of the global hydrologic cycle that should be validated at local to global scales in Earth System Models (ESMs) used for climate projection. We have evaluated the runoff and surface soil moisture output by the Community Climate System Model (CCSM) along with 8 other models from the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP5) repository using satellite soil moisture observations and stream gauge corrected runoff products. A series of Community Land Model (CLM) runs forced by reanalysis and coupled model outputs was also performed to identify atmospheric drivers of biases and uncertainties in the CCSM. Results indicate that surface soil moisture simulations tend to be positively biased in high latitude areas by most selected CMIP5 models except CCSM, FGOALS, and BCC, which share similar land surface model code. With the exception of GISS, runoff simulations by all selected CMIP5 models were overestimated in mountain ranges and in most of the Arctic region. In general, positive biases in CCSM soil moisture and runoff due to precipitation input error were offset by negative biases induced by temperature input error. Excluding the impact from atmosphere modeling, the global mean of seasonal surface moisture oscillation was out of phase compared to observations in many years during 1985–2004. The CLM also underestimated runoff in the Amazon, central Africa, and south Asia, where soils all have high clay content. We hypothesize that lack of a macropore flow mechanism is partially responsible for this underestimation. However, runoff was overestimated in the areas covered by volcanic ash soils (i.e., Andisols), which might be associated with poor soil porosity representation in CLM. Our results indicate that CCSM predictability of hydrology could be improved by addressing the compensating errors associated with precipitation and temperature and updating the CLM soil representation. Article in Journal/Newspaper Arctic University of California: eScholarship Arctic International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation 48 5 16
institution Open Polar
collection University of California: eScholarship
op_collection_id ftcdlib
language English
description © 2015 Runoff and soil moisture are two key components of the global hydrologic cycle that should be validated at local to global scales in Earth System Models (ESMs) used for climate projection. We have evaluated the runoff and surface soil moisture output by the Community Climate System Model (CCSM) along with 8 other models from the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP5) repository using satellite soil moisture observations and stream gauge corrected runoff products. A series of Community Land Model (CLM) runs forced by reanalysis and coupled model outputs was also performed to identify atmospheric drivers of biases and uncertainties in the CCSM. Results indicate that surface soil moisture simulations tend to be positively biased in high latitude areas by most selected CMIP5 models except CCSM, FGOALS, and BCC, which share similar land surface model code. With the exception of GISS, runoff simulations by all selected CMIP5 models were overestimated in mountain ranges and in most of the Arctic region. In general, positive biases in CCSM soil moisture and runoff due to precipitation input error were offset by negative biases induced by temperature input error. Excluding the impact from atmosphere modeling, the global mean of seasonal surface moisture oscillation was out of phase compared to observations in many years during 1985–2004. The CLM also underestimated runoff in the Amazon, central Africa, and south Asia, where soils all have high clay content. We hypothesize that lack of a macropore flow mechanism is partially responsible for this underestimation. However, runoff was overestimated in the areas covered by volcanic ash soils (i.e., Andisols), which might be associated with poor soil porosity representation in CLM. Our results indicate that CCSM predictability of hydrology could be improved by addressing the compensating errors associated with precipitation and temperature and updating the CLM soil representation.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Du, E
Vittorio, AD
Collins, WD
spellingShingle Du, E
Vittorio, AD
Collins, WD
Evaluation of hydrologic components of community land model 4 and bias identification
author_facet Du, E
Vittorio, AD
Collins, WD
author_sort Du, E
title Evaluation of hydrologic components of community land model 4 and bias identification
title_short Evaluation of hydrologic components of community land model 4 and bias identification
title_full Evaluation of hydrologic components of community land model 4 and bias identification
title_fullStr Evaluation of hydrologic components of community land model 4 and bias identification
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of hydrologic components of community land model 4 and bias identification
title_sort evaluation of hydrologic components of community land model 4 and bias identification
publisher eScholarship, University of California
publishDate 2016
url http://www.escholarship.org/uc/item/1qg6h8z1
op_coverage 5 - 16
geographic Arctic
geographic_facet Arctic
genre Arctic
genre_facet Arctic
op_source Du, E; Vittorio, AD; & Collins, WD. (2016). Evaluation of hydrologic components of community land model 4 and bias identification. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation, 48, 5 - 16. doi:10.1016/j.jag.2015.03.013. UC Berkeley: Retrieved from: http://www.escholarship.org/uc/item/1qg6h8z1
op_relation qt1qg6h8z1
http://www.escholarship.org/uc/item/1qg6h8z1
op_rights public
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jag.2015.03.013
container_title International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation
container_volume 48
container_start_page 5
op_container_end_page 16
_version_ 1766345557693956096