Dark Energy Survey year 1 results: Joint analysis of galaxy clustering, galaxy lensing, and CMB lensing two-point functions
We perform a joint analysis of the auto and cross-correlations between three cosmic fields: the galaxy density field, the galaxy weak lensing shear field, and the cosmic microwave background (CMB) weak lensing convergence field. These three fields are measured using roughly 1300 sq. deg. of overlapp...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article in Journal/Newspaper |
Language: | unknown |
Published: |
eScholarship, University of California
2019
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://escholarship.org/uc/item/9zv6631m |
id |
ftcdlib:oai:escholarship.org:ark:/13030/qt9zv6631m |
---|---|
record_format |
openpolar |
spelling |
ftcdlib:oai:escholarship.org:ark:/13030/qt9zv6631m 2024-01-14T10:10:46+01:00 Dark Energy Survey year 1 results: Joint analysis of galaxy clustering, galaxy lensing, and CMB lensing two-point functions Abbott, TMC Abdalla, FB Alarcon, A Allam, S Annis, J Avila, S Aylor, K Banerji, M Banik, N Baxter, EJ Bechtol, K Becker, MR Benson, BA Bernstein, GM Bertin, E Bianchini, F Blazek, J Bleem, LE Bridle, SL Brooks, D Buckley-Geer, E Burke, DL Carlstrom, JE Rosell, A Carnero Kind, M Carrasco Carretero, J Castander, FJ Cawthon, R Chang, C Chang, CL Cho, H-M Choi, A Chown, R Crawford, TM Crites, AT Crocce, M Cunha, CE D’Andrea, CB da Costa, LN Davis, C de Haan, T DeRose, J Desai, S De Vicente, J Diehl, HT Dietrich, JP Dobbs, MA Dodelson, S Doel, P Drlica-Wagner, A Eifler, TF Elvin-Poole, J Everett, WB Flaugher, B Fosalba, P Friedrich, O Frieman, J García-Bellido, J Gatti, M Gaztanaga, E George, EM Gerdes, DW Giannantonio, T Gruen, D Gruendl, RA Gschwend, J Gutierrez, G Halverson, NW Harrington, NL Hartley, WG Holder, GP Hollowood, DL Holzapfel, WL Honscheid, K Hou, Z Hoyle, B Hrubes, JD Huterer, D Jain, B James, DJ Jarvis, M Jeltema, T Johnson, MWG Johnson, MD Kent, S Kirk, D Knox, L Kokron, N Krause, E Kuehn, K Lahav, O Lee, AT Leitch, EM Li, TS Lima, M Lin, H Luong-Van, D MacCrann, N Maia, MAG Manzotti, A 023541 2019-07-15 application/pdf https://escholarship.org/uc/item/9zv6631m unknown eScholarship, University of California qt9zv6631m https://escholarship.org/uc/item/9zv6631m public Physical Review D, vol 100, iss 2 Particle and High Energy Physics Physical Sciences astro-ph.CO Astronomical and Space Sciences Atomic Molecular Nuclear Particle and Plasma Physics Quantum Physics Nuclear & Particles Physics Mathematical physics Astronomical sciences article 2019 ftcdlib 2023-12-18T19:07:44Z We perform a joint analysis of the auto and cross-correlations between three cosmic fields: the galaxy density field, the galaxy weak lensing shear field, and the cosmic microwave background (CMB) weak lensing convergence field. These three fields are measured using roughly 1300 sq. deg. of overlapping optical imaging data from first year observations of the Dark Energy Survey and millimeter-wave observations of the CMB from both the South Pole Telescope Sunyaev-Zel'dovich survey and Planck. We present cosmological constraints from the joint analysis of the two-point correlation functions between galaxy density and galaxy shear with CMB lensing. We test for consistency between these measurements and the DES-only two-point function measurements, finding no evidence for inconsistency in the context of flat $\Lambda$CDM cosmological models. Performing a joint analysis of five of the possible correlation functions between these fields (excluding only the CMB lensing autospectrum) yields $S_{8}\equiv \sigma_8\sqrt{\Omega_{\rm m}/0.3} = 0.782^{+0.019}_{-0.025}$ and $\Omega_{\rm m}=0.260^{+0.029}_{-0.019}$. We test for consistency between these five correlation function measurements and the Planck-only measurement of the CMB lensing autospectrum, again finding no evidence for inconsistency in the context of flat $\Lambda$CDM models. Combining constraints from all six two-point functions yields $S_{8}=0.776^{+0.014}_{-0.021}$ and $\Omega_{\rm m}= 0.271^{+0.022}_{-0.016}$. These results provide a powerful test and confirmation of the results from the first year DES joint-probes analysis. Article in Journal/Newspaper South pole University of California: eScholarship Lambda ENVELOPE(-62.983,-62.983,-64.300,-64.300) South Pole |
institution |
Open Polar |
collection |
University of California: eScholarship |
op_collection_id |
ftcdlib |
language |
unknown |
topic |
Particle and High Energy Physics Physical Sciences astro-ph.CO Astronomical and Space Sciences Atomic Molecular Nuclear Particle and Plasma Physics Quantum Physics Nuclear & Particles Physics Mathematical physics Astronomical sciences |
spellingShingle |
Particle and High Energy Physics Physical Sciences astro-ph.CO Astronomical and Space Sciences Atomic Molecular Nuclear Particle and Plasma Physics Quantum Physics Nuclear & Particles Physics Mathematical physics Astronomical sciences Abbott, TMC Abdalla, FB Alarcon, A Allam, S Annis, J Avila, S Aylor, K Banerji, M Banik, N Baxter, EJ Bechtol, K Becker, MR Benson, BA Bernstein, GM Bertin, E Bianchini, F Blazek, J Bleem, LE Bridle, SL Brooks, D Buckley-Geer, E Burke, DL Carlstrom, JE Rosell, A Carnero Kind, M Carrasco Carretero, J Castander, FJ Cawthon, R Chang, C Chang, CL Cho, H-M Choi, A Chown, R Crawford, TM Crites, AT Crocce, M Cunha, CE D’Andrea, CB da Costa, LN Davis, C de Haan, T DeRose, J Desai, S De Vicente, J Diehl, HT Dietrich, JP Dobbs, MA Dodelson, S Doel, P Drlica-Wagner, A Eifler, TF Elvin-Poole, J Everett, WB Flaugher, B Fosalba, P Friedrich, O Frieman, J García-Bellido, J Gatti, M Gaztanaga, E George, EM Gerdes, DW Giannantonio, T Gruen, D Gruendl, RA Gschwend, J Gutierrez, G Halverson, NW Harrington, NL Hartley, WG Holder, GP Hollowood, DL Holzapfel, WL Honscheid, K Hou, Z Hoyle, B Hrubes, JD Huterer, D Jain, B James, DJ Jarvis, M Jeltema, T Johnson, MWG Johnson, MD Kent, S Kirk, D Knox, L Kokron, N Krause, E Kuehn, K Lahav, O Lee, AT Leitch, EM Li, TS Lima, M Lin, H Luong-Van, D MacCrann, N Maia, MAG Manzotti, A Dark Energy Survey year 1 results: Joint analysis of galaxy clustering, galaxy lensing, and CMB lensing two-point functions |
topic_facet |
Particle and High Energy Physics Physical Sciences astro-ph.CO Astronomical and Space Sciences Atomic Molecular Nuclear Particle and Plasma Physics Quantum Physics Nuclear & Particles Physics Mathematical physics Astronomical sciences |
description |
We perform a joint analysis of the auto and cross-correlations between three cosmic fields: the galaxy density field, the galaxy weak lensing shear field, and the cosmic microwave background (CMB) weak lensing convergence field. These three fields are measured using roughly 1300 sq. deg. of overlapping optical imaging data from first year observations of the Dark Energy Survey and millimeter-wave observations of the CMB from both the South Pole Telescope Sunyaev-Zel'dovich survey and Planck. We present cosmological constraints from the joint analysis of the two-point correlation functions between galaxy density and galaxy shear with CMB lensing. We test for consistency between these measurements and the DES-only two-point function measurements, finding no evidence for inconsistency in the context of flat $\Lambda$CDM cosmological models. Performing a joint analysis of five of the possible correlation functions between these fields (excluding only the CMB lensing autospectrum) yields $S_{8}\equiv \sigma_8\sqrt{\Omega_{\rm m}/0.3} = 0.782^{+0.019}_{-0.025}$ and $\Omega_{\rm m}=0.260^{+0.029}_{-0.019}$. We test for consistency between these five correlation function measurements and the Planck-only measurement of the CMB lensing autospectrum, again finding no evidence for inconsistency in the context of flat $\Lambda$CDM models. Combining constraints from all six two-point functions yields $S_{8}=0.776^{+0.014}_{-0.021}$ and $\Omega_{\rm m}= 0.271^{+0.022}_{-0.016}$. These results provide a powerful test and confirmation of the results from the first year DES joint-probes analysis. |
format |
Article in Journal/Newspaper |
author |
Abbott, TMC Abdalla, FB Alarcon, A Allam, S Annis, J Avila, S Aylor, K Banerji, M Banik, N Baxter, EJ Bechtol, K Becker, MR Benson, BA Bernstein, GM Bertin, E Bianchini, F Blazek, J Bleem, LE Bridle, SL Brooks, D Buckley-Geer, E Burke, DL Carlstrom, JE Rosell, A Carnero Kind, M Carrasco Carretero, J Castander, FJ Cawthon, R Chang, C Chang, CL Cho, H-M Choi, A Chown, R Crawford, TM Crites, AT Crocce, M Cunha, CE D’Andrea, CB da Costa, LN Davis, C de Haan, T DeRose, J Desai, S De Vicente, J Diehl, HT Dietrich, JP Dobbs, MA Dodelson, S Doel, P Drlica-Wagner, A Eifler, TF Elvin-Poole, J Everett, WB Flaugher, B Fosalba, P Friedrich, O Frieman, J García-Bellido, J Gatti, M Gaztanaga, E George, EM Gerdes, DW Giannantonio, T Gruen, D Gruendl, RA Gschwend, J Gutierrez, G Halverson, NW Harrington, NL Hartley, WG Holder, GP Hollowood, DL Holzapfel, WL Honscheid, K Hou, Z Hoyle, B Hrubes, JD Huterer, D Jain, B James, DJ Jarvis, M Jeltema, T Johnson, MWG Johnson, MD Kent, S Kirk, D Knox, L Kokron, N Krause, E Kuehn, K Lahav, O Lee, AT Leitch, EM Li, TS Lima, M Lin, H Luong-Van, D MacCrann, N Maia, MAG Manzotti, A |
author_facet |
Abbott, TMC Abdalla, FB Alarcon, A Allam, S Annis, J Avila, S Aylor, K Banerji, M Banik, N Baxter, EJ Bechtol, K Becker, MR Benson, BA Bernstein, GM Bertin, E Bianchini, F Blazek, J Bleem, LE Bridle, SL Brooks, D Buckley-Geer, E Burke, DL Carlstrom, JE Rosell, A Carnero Kind, M Carrasco Carretero, J Castander, FJ Cawthon, R Chang, C Chang, CL Cho, H-M Choi, A Chown, R Crawford, TM Crites, AT Crocce, M Cunha, CE D’Andrea, CB da Costa, LN Davis, C de Haan, T DeRose, J Desai, S De Vicente, J Diehl, HT Dietrich, JP Dobbs, MA Dodelson, S Doel, P Drlica-Wagner, A Eifler, TF Elvin-Poole, J Everett, WB Flaugher, B Fosalba, P Friedrich, O Frieman, J García-Bellido, J Gatti, M Gaztanaga, E George, EM Gerdes, DW Giannantonio, T Gruen, D Gruendl, RA Gschwend, J Gutierrez, G Halverson, NW Harrington, NL Hartley, WG Holder, GP Hollowood, DL Holzapfel, WL Honscheid, K Hou, Z Hoyle, B Hrubes, JD Huterer, D Jain, B James, DJ Jarvis, M Jeltema, T Johnson, MWG Johnson, MD Kent, S Kirk, D Knox, L Kokron, N Krause, E Kuehn, K Lahav, O Lee, AT Leitch, EM Li, TS Lima, M Lin, H Luong-Van, D MacCrann, N Maia, MAG Manzotti, A |
author_sort |
Abbott, TMC |
title |
Dark Energy Survey year 1 results: Joint analysis of galaxy clustering, galaxy lensing, and CMB lensing two-point functions |
title_short |
Dark Energy Survey year 1 results: Joint analysis of galaxy clustering, galaxy lensing, and CMB lensing two-point functions |
title_full |
Dark Energy Survey year 1 results: Joint analysis of galaxy clustering, galaxy lensing, and CMB lensing two-point functions |
title_fullStr |
Dark Energy Survey year 1 results: Joint analysis of galaxy clustering, galaxy lensing, and CMB lensing two-point functions |
title_full_unstemmed |
Dark Energy Survey year 1 results: Joint analysis of galaxy clustering, galaxy lensing, and CMB lensing two-point functions |
title_sort |
dark energy survey year 1 results: joint analysis of galaxy clustering, galaxy lensing, and cmb lensing two-point functions |
publisher |
eScholarship, University of California |
publishDate |
2019 |
url |
https://escholarship.org/uc/item/9zv6631m |
op_coverage |
023541 |
long_lat |
ENVELOPE(-62.983,-62.983,-64.300,-64.300) |
geographic |
Lambda South Pole |
geographic_facet |
Lambda South Pole |
genre |
South pole |
genre_facet |
South pole |
op_source |
Physical Review D, vol 100, iss 2 |
op_relation |
qt9zv6631m https://escholarship.org/uc/item/9zv6631m |
op_rights |
public |
_version_ |
1788065577511682048 |