Indian Governments and the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms

In February 1992, a judge of the Supreme Court of the province of British Columbia ruled that the native ritual of spirit dancing is subject to Canadian law protecting individual rights and is not an aboriginal right under Section 35(1)of the Constitution Act, 1982. The decision emerged from a civil...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Long, J. Anthony, Chiste, Katherine Beaty
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:unknown
Published: eScholarship, University of California 1994
Subjects:
Online Access:https://escholarship.org/uc/item/5d13s486
id ftcdlib:oai:escholarship.org:ark:/13030/qt5d13s486
record_format openpolar
spelling ftcdlib:oai:escholarship.org:ark:/13030/qt5d13s486 2023-09-05T13:19:30+02:00 Indian Governments and the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms Long, J. Anthony Chiste, Katherine Beaty 1994-03-01 application/pdf https://escholarship.org/uc/item/5d13s486 unknown eScholarship, University of California qt5d13s486 https://escholarship.org/uc/item/5d13s486 CC-BY-NC American Indian Culture and Research Journal , vol 18, iss 2 spirit dancing community's responsibility individual members cultural tradition aboriginal rights Canadian law supremacy of the individual article 1994 ftcdlib 2023-08-21T18:07:37Z In February 1992, a judge of the Supreme Court of the province of British Columbia ruled that the native ritual of spirit dancing is subject to Canadian law protecting individual rights and is not an aboriginal right under Section 35(1)of the Constitution Act, 1982. The decision emerged from a civil suit brought by a Salish Indian against several other members of the Salish Nation on Vancouver Island, in which the plaintiff argued that he had been unwillingly subjected to this ritual. Spirit dancing, which was banned under Canadian law from 1880 to 1951, is a therapeutic ritual involving fasting and confinement until a person hears the song of a guardian spirit and begins singing and dancing. Ordinarily, entrance into this ritual is voluntary and is considered to be an honor by tribal members. According to Salish tradition, however, relatives may request that a person be subject to this rite to help that person solve personal problems; this tradition reflects the community’s responsibility for its individual members. The judge’s decision angered tribal leaders within coastal Indian communities, who claim that cultural traditions stressing the primacy of the community over its members are collective aboriginal rights that are shielded from Canadian law, which is rooted in the belief of the supremacy of the individual. The spirit dancing case brings into sharp focus an issue that has been a critical part of the aboriginal rights debate in Canada for more than a decade, namely whether the protections of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms guaranteed to Canadian citizens should apply to Indian First Nations in their relationship with their own tribal members, who are also Canadian citizens. Article in Journal/Newspaper First Nations University of California: eScholarship British Columbia ENVELOPE(-125.003,-125.003,54.000,54.000) Canada Indian
institution Open Polar
collection University of California: eScholarship
op_collection_id ftcdlib
language unknown
topic spirit dancing
community's responsibility
individual members
cultural tradition
aboriginal rights
Canadian law
supremacy of the individual
spellingShingle spirit dancing
community's responsibility
individual members
cultural tradition
aboriginal rights
Canadian law
supremacy of the individual
Long, J. Anthony
Chiste, Katherine Beaty
Indian Governments and the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms
topic_facet spirit dancing
community's responsibility
individual members
cultural tradition
aboriginal rights
Canadian law
supremacy of the individual
description In February 1992, a judge of the Supreme Court of the province of British Columbia ruled that the native ritual of spirit dancing is subject to Canadian law protecting individual rights and is not an aboriginal right under Section 35(1)of the Constitution Act, 1982. The decision emerged from a civil suit brought by a Salish Indian against several other members of the Salish Nation on Vancouver Island, in which the plaintiff argued that he had been unwillingly subjected to this ritual. Spirit dancing, which was banned under Canadian law from 1880 to 1951, is a therapeutic ritual involving fasting and confinement until a person hears the song of a guardian spirit and begins singing and dancing. Ordinarily, entrance into this ritual is voluntary and is considered to be an honor by tribal members. According to Salish tradition, however, relatives may request that a person be subject to this rite to help that person solve personal problems; this tradition reflects the community’s responsibility for its individual members. The judge’s decision angered tribal leaders within coastal Indian communities, who claim that cultural traditions stressing the primacy of the community over its members are collective aboriginal rights that are shielded from Canadian law, which is rooted in the belief of the supremacy of the individual. The spirit dancing case brings into sharp focus an issue that has been a critical part of the aboriginal rights debate in Canada for more than a decade, namely whether the protections of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms guaranteed to Canadian citizens should apply to Indian First Nations in their relationship with their own tribal members, who are also Canadian citizens.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Long, J. Anthony
Chiste, Katherine Beaty
author_facet Long, J. Anthony
Chiste, Katherine Beaty
author_sort Long, J. Anthony
title Indian Governments and the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms
title_short Indian Governments and the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms
title_full Indian Governments and the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms
title_fullStr Indian Governments and the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms
title_full_unstemmed Indian Governments and the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms
title_sort indian governments and the canadian charter of rights and freedoms
publisher eScholarship, University of California
publishDate 1994
url https://escholarship.org/uc/item/5d13s486
long_lat ENVELOPE(-125.003,-125.003,54.000,54.000)
geographic British Columbia
Canada
Indian
geographic_facet British Columbia
Canada
Indian
genre First Nations
genre_facet First Nations
op_source American Indian Culture and Research Journal , vol 18, iss 2
op_relation qt5d13s486
https://escholarship.org/uc/item/5d13s486
op_rights CC-BY-NC
_version_ 1776200291919593472