A range correction for ICESat and its potential impact on ice-sheet mass balance studies

We report on a previously undocumented range error in NASA's Ice, Cloud and land Elevation Satellite (ICESat) that degrades elevation precision and introduces a small but significant elevation trend over the ICESat mission period. This range error (the Gaussian-Centroid or "G-C" offse...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Borsa, AA, Moholdt, G, Fricker, HA, Brunt, KM
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:unknown
Published: eScholarship, University of California 2014
Subjects:
Online Access:https://escholarship.org/uc/item/11x4x6t5
id ftcdlib:oai:escholarship.org:ark:/13030/qt11x4x6t5
record_format openpolar
spelling ftcdlib:oai:escholarship.org:ark:/13030/qt11x4x6t5 2023-10-01T03:56:41+02:00 A range correction for ICESat and its potential impact on ice-sheet mass balance studies Borsa, AA Moholdt, G Fricker, HA Brunt, KM 345 - 357 2014-01-01 application/pdf https://escholarship.org/uc/item/11x4x6t5 unknown eScholarship, University of California qt11x4x6t5 https://escholarship.org/uc/item/11x4x6t5 public The Cryosphere, vol 8, iss 2 Climate Action Oceanography Physical Geography and Environmental Geoscience Meteorology & Atmospheric Sciences article 2014 ftcdlib 2023-09-04T18:04:38Z We report on a previously undocumented range error in NASA's Ice, Cloud and land Elevation Satellite (ICESat) that degrades elevation precision and introduces a small but significant elevation trend over the ICESat mission period. This range error (the Gaussian-Centroid or "G-C" offset) varies on a shot-to-shot basis and exhibits increasing scatter when laser transmit energies fall below 20 mJ. Although the G-C offset is uncorrelated over periods ≤ 1 day, it evolves over the life of each of ICESat's three lasers in a series of ramps and jumps that give rise to spurious elevation trends of-0.92 to-1.90 cm yr-1, depending on the time period considered. Using ICESat data over the Ross and Filchner-Ronne ice shelves we show that (1) the G-C offset introduces significant biases in ice-shelf mass balance estimates, and (2) the mass balance bias can vary between regions because of different temporal samplings of ICESat. We can reproduce the effect of the G-C offset over these two ice shelves by fitting trends to sample-weighted mean G-C offsets for each campaign, suggesting that it may not be necessary to fully repeat earlier ICESat studies to determine the impact of the G-C offset on ice-sheet mass balance estimates. © 2014 Author(s.). Article in Journal/Newspaper Ice Sheet Ice Shelf Ice Shelves The Cryosphere University of California: eScholarship
institution Open Polar
collection University of California: eScholarship
op_collection_id ftcdlib
language unknown
topic Climate Action
Oceanography
Physical Geography and Environmental Geoscience
Meteorology & Atmospheric Sciences
spellingShingle Climate Action
Oceanography
Physical Geography and Environmental Geoscience
Meteorology & Atmospheric Sciences
Borsa, AA
Moholdt, G
Fricker, HA
Brunt, KM
A range correction for ICESat and its potential impact on ice-sheet mass balance studies
topic_facet Climate Action
Oceanography
Physical Geography and Environmental Geoscience
Meteorology & Atmospheric Sciences
description We report on a previously undocumented range error in NASA's Ice, Cloud and land Elevation Satellite (ICESat) that degrades elevation precision and introduces a small but significant elevation trend over the ICESat mission period. This range error (the Gaussian-Centroid or "G-C" offset) varies on a shot-to-shot basis and exhibits increasing scatter when laser transmit energies fall below 20 mJ. Although the G-C offset is uncorrelated over periods ≤ 1 day, it evolves over the life of each of ICESat's three lasers in a series of ramps and jumps that give rise to spurious elevation trends of-0.92 to-1.90 cm yr-1, depending on the time period considered. Using ICESat data over the Ross and Filchner-Ronne ice shelves we show that (1) the G-C offset introduces significant biases in ice-shelf mass balance estimates, and (2) the mass balance bias can vary between regions because of different temporal samplings of ICESat. We can reproduce the effect of the G-C offset over these two ice shelves by fitting trends to sample-weighted mean G-C offsets for each campaign, suggesting that it may not be necessary to fully repeat earlier ICESat studies to determine the impact of the G-C offset on ice-sheet mass balance estimates. © 2014 Author(s.).
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Borsa, AA
Moholdt, G
Fricker, HA
Brunt, KM
author_facet Borsa, AA
Moholdt, G
Fricker, HA
Brunt, KM
author_sort Borsa, AA
title A range correction for ICESat and its potential impact on ice-sheet mass balance studies
title_short A range correction for ICESat and its potential impact on ice-sheet mass balance studies
title_full A range correction for ICESat and its potential impact on ice-sheet mass balance studies
title_fullStr A range correction for ICESat and its potential impact on ice-sheet mass balance studies
title_full_unstemmed A range correction for ICESat and its potential impact on ice-sheet mass balance studies
title_sort range correction for icesat and its potential impact on ice-sheet mass balance studies
publisher eScholarship, University of California
publishDate 2014
url https://escholarship.org/uc/item/11x4x6t5
op_coverage 345 - 357
genre Ice Sheet
Ice Shelf
Ice Shelves
The Cryosphere
genre_facet Ice Sheet
Ice Shelf
Ice Shelves
The Cryosphere
op_source The Cryosphere, vol 8, iss 2
op_relation qt11x4x6t5
https://escholarship.org/uc/item/11x4x6t5
op_rights public
_version_ 1778526750531125248