A range correction for ICESat and its potential impact on ice-sheet mass balance studies
We report on a previously undocumented range error in NASA's Ice, Cloud and land Elevation Satellite (ICESat) that degrades elevation precision and introduces a small but significant elevation trend over the ICESat mission period. This range error (the Gaussian-Centroid or "G-C" offse...
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article in Journal/Newspaper |
Language: | unknown |
Published: |
eScholarship, University of California
2014
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://escholarship.org/uc/item/11x4x6t5 |
id |
ftcdlib:oai:escholarship.org:ark:/13030/qt11x4x6t5 |
---|---|
record_format |
openpolar |
spelling |
ftcdlib:oai:escholarship.org:ark:/13030/qt11x4x6t5 2023-10-01T03:56:41+02:00 A range correction for ICESat and its potential impact on ice-sheet mass balance studies Borsa, AA Moholdt, G Fricker, HA Brunt, KM 345 - 357 2014-01-01 application/pdf https://escholarship.org/uc/item/11x4x6t5 unknown eScholarship, University of California qt11x4x6t5 https://escholarship.org/uc/item/11x4x6t5 public The Cryosphere, vol 8, iss 2 Climate Action Oceanography Physical Geography and Environmental Geoscience Meteorology & Atmospheric Sciences article 2014 ftcdlib 2023-09-04T18:04:38Z We report on a previously undocumented range error in NASA's Ice, Cloud and land Elevation Satellite (ICESat) that degrades elevation precision and introduces a small but significant elevation trend over the ICESat mission period. This range error (the Gaussian-Centroid or "G-C" offset) varies on a shot-to-shot basis and exhibits increasing scatter when laser transmit energies fall below 20 mJ. Although the G-C offset is uncorrelated over periods ≤ 1 day, it evolves over the life of each of ICESat's three lasers in a series of ramps and jumps that give rise to spurious elevation trends of-0.92 to-1.90 cm yr-1, depending on the time period considered. Using ICESat data over the Ross and Filchner-Ronne ice shelves we show that (1) the G-C offset introduces significant biases in ice-shelf mass balance estimates, and (2) the mass balance bias can vary between regions because of different temporal samplings of ICESat. We can reproduce the effect of the G-C offset over these two ice shelves by fitting trends to sample-weighted mean G-C offsets for each campaign, suggesting that it may not be necessary to fully repeat earlier ICESat studies to determine the impact of the G-C offset on ice-sheet mass balance estimates. © 2014 Author(s.). Article in Journal/Newspaper Ice Sheet Ice Shelf Ice Shelves The Cryosphere University of California: eScholarship |
institution |
Open Polar |
collection |
University of California: eScholarship |
op_collection_id |
ftcdlib |
language |
unknown |
topic |
Climate Action Oceanography Physical Geography and Environmental Geoscience Meteorology & Atmospheric Sciences |
spellingShingle |
Climate Action Oceanography Physical Geography and Environmental Geoscience Meteorology & Atmospheric Sciences Borsa, AA Moholdt, G Fricker, HA Brunt, KM A range correction for ICESat and its potential impact on ice-sheet mass balance studies |
topic_facet |
Climate Action Oceanography Physical Geography and Environmental Geoscience Meteorology & Atmospheric Sciences |
description |
We report on a previously undocumented range error in NASA's Ice, Cloud and land Elevation Satellite (ICESat) that degrades elevation precision and introduces a small but significant elevation trend over the ICESat mission period. This range error (the Gaussian-Centroid or "G-C" offset) varies on a shot-to-shot basis and exhibits increasing scatter when laser transmit energies fall below 20 mJ. Although the G-C offset is uncorrelated over periods ≤ 1 day, it evolves over the life of each of ICESat's three lasers in a series of ramps and jumps that give rise to spurious elevation trends of-0.92 to-1.90 cm yr-1, depending on the time period considered. Using ICESat data over the Ross and Filchner-Ronne ice shelves we show that (1) the G-C offset introduces significant biases in ice-shelf mass balance estimates, and (2) the mass balance bias can vary between regions because of different temporal samplings of ICESat. We can reproduce the effect of the G-C offset over these two ice shelves by fitting trends to sample-weighted mean G-C offsets for each campaign, suggesting that it may not be necessary to fully repeat earlier ICESat studies to determine the impact of the G-C offset on ice-sheet mass balance estimates. © 2014 Author(s.). |
format |
Article in Journal/Newspaper |
author |
Borsa, AA Moholdt, G Fricker, HA Brunt, KM |
author_facet |
Borsa, AA Moholdt, G Fricker, HA Brunt, KM |
author_sort |
Borsa, AA |
title |
A range correction for ICESat and its potential impact on ice-sheet mass balance studies |
title_short |
A range correction for ICESat and its potential impact on ice-sheet mass balance studies |
title_full |
A range correction for ICESat and its potential impact on ice-sheet mass balance studies |
title_fullStr |
A range correction for ICESat and its potential impact on ice-sheet mass balance studies |
title_full_unstemmed |
A range correction for ICESat and its potential impact on ice-sheet mass balance studies |
title_sort |
range correction for icesat and its potential impact on ice-sheet mass balance studies |
publisher |
eScholarship, University of California |
publishDate |
2014 |
url |
https://escholarship.org/uc/item/11x4x6t5 |
op_coverage |
345 - 357 |
genre |
Ice Sheet Ice Shelf Ice Shelves The Cryosphere |
genre_facet |
Ice Sheet Ice Shelf Ice Shelves The Cryosphere |
op_source |
The Cryosphere, vol 8, iss 2 |
op_relation |
qt11x4x6t5 https://escholarship.org/uc/item/11x4x6t5 |
op_rights |
public |
_version_ |
1778526750531125248 |