How Do Providers Serving American Indians and Alaska Natives With Substance Abuse Problems Define Evidence-Based Treatment?

• Main Authors: Moore, Laurie A, Aarons, Gregory A, Davis, Jordan H, Novins, Douglas K
• Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
• Language: unknown
• Published: eScholarship, University of California 2015
• Subjects: Psychology; Clinical and Health Psychology; Social and Personality Psychology; Applied and Developmental Psychology; Drug Abuse (NIDA only); American Indian or Alaska Native; Substance Misuse; Arctic; Clinical Research; Rural Health; Good Health and Well Being; Adult; Alaska; Evidence-Based Practice; Humans; Indians; North American; Inuit; Program Evaluation; Substance-Related Disorders; Native Americans; evidence-based treatment; substance abuse treatment; knowledge; attitudes; Psychiatry; Indian; inuit
• Online Access: https://escholarship.org/uc/item/0nz8q1dn

Rates of substance abuse remain high in American Indian and Alaska Native (AI/AN) populations. While there are many evidence-based treatments (EBTs) for substance use problems, no studies exist describing how directors of treatment programs serving AI/ANs perceive and use EBTs. Twenty-one key informant interviews with program administrators and 10 focus groups with clinicians were conducted at 18 treatment programs for AI/ANs with substance use problems. Demographic data were not collected to protect participant privacy. Transcripts were coded to identify relevant themes. A majority of participants correctly defined an EBT using the key terms "effective" and "research" found in standard definitions of the phrase. More detailed descriptions were uncommon. Prevalent themes related to attitudes about EBTs included concerns about cultural relevance, external mandates to use EBTs, and their reliance on western conceptualization of substance abuse. While most administrators and clinicians who treat AI/AN clients for substance abuse had a basic understanding of what constitutes an EBT, there was little consensus regarding their relevance for use with AI/ANs. Recognizing that broad geographic and tribal diversity among AI/AN populations may impact conclusions drawn about EBTs, several factors may enhance the abilities of program staff to identify EBTs most appropriate for local implementation. These include gaining a more detailed understanding of how an EBT is developed and how to assess its scientific grounding, as well as utilizing definitions of EBTs that include not only research evidence, but also clinical expertise and judgment, and fit with consumer choice, preference, and culture.