Dark Energy Survey year 1 results: Joint analysis of galaxy clustering, galaxy lensing, and CMB lensing two-point functions

We perform a joint analysis of the auto and cross-correlations between three cosmic fields: the galaxy density field, the galaxy weak lensing shear field, and the cosmic microwave background (CMB) weak lensing convergence field. These three fields are measured using roughly 1300 sq. deg. of overlapp...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Abbott, TMC, Abdalla, FB, Alarcon, A, Allam, S, Annis, J, Avila, S, Aylor, K, Banerji, M, Banik, N, Baxter, EJ, Bechtol, K, Becker, MR, Benson, BA, Bernstein, GM, Bertin, E, Bianchini, F, Blazek, J, Bleem, LE, Bridle, SL, Brooks, D, Buckley-Geer, E, Burke, DL, Carlstrom, JE, Rosell, A Carnero, Kind, M Carrasco, Carretero, J, Castander, FJ, Cawthon, R, Chang, C, Chang, CL, Cho, H-M, Choi, A, Chown, R, Crawford, TM, Crites, AT, Crocce, M, Cunha, CE, D'Andrea, CB, da Costa, LN, Davis, C, de Haan, T, DeRose, J, Desai, S, De Vicente, J, Diehl, HT, Dietrich, JP, Dobbs, MA, Dodelson, S, Doel, P, Drlica-Wagner, A, Eifler, TF, Elvin-Poole, J, Everett, WB, Flaugher, B, Fosalba, P, Friedrich, O, Frieman, J, Garcia-Bellido, J, Gatti, M, Gaztanaga, E, George, EM, Gerdes, DW, Giannantonio, T, Gruen, D, Gruendl, RA, Gschwend, J, Gutierrez, G, Halverson, NW, Harrington, NL, Hartley, WG, Holder, GP, Hollowood, DL, Holzapfel, WL, Honscheid, K, Hou, Z, Hoyle, B, Hrubes, JD, Huterer, D, Jain, B, James, DJ, Jarvis, M, Jeltema, T, Johnson, MWG, Johnson, MD, Kent, S, Kirk, D, Knox, L, Kokron, N, Krause, E, Kuehn, K, Lahav, O, Lee, AT, Leitch, EM, Li, TS, Lima, M, Lin, H, Luong-Van, D, MacCrann, N, Maia, MAG, Manzotti, A
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:unknown
Published: eScholarship, University of California 2019
Subjects:
Online Access:https://escholarship.org/uc/item/9zv6631m
id ftcdlib:oai:escholarship.org/ark:/13030/qt9zv6631m
record_format openpolar
spelling ftcdlib:oai:escholarship.org/ark:/13030/qt9zv6631m 2023-05-15T18:23:01+02:00 Dark Energy Survey year 1 results: Joint analysis of galaxy clustering, galaxy lensing, and CMB lensing two-point functions Abbott, TMC Abdalla, FB Alarcon, A Allam, S Annis, J Avila, S Aylor, K Banerji, M Banik, N Baxter, EJ Bechtol, K Becker, MR Benson, BA Bernstein, GM Bertin, E Bianchini, F Blazek, J Bleem, LE Bridle, SL Brooks, D Buckley-Geer, E Burke, DL Carlstrom, JE Rosell, A Carnero Kind, M Carrasco Carretero, J Castander, FJ Cawthon, R Chang, C Chang, CL Cho, H-M Choi, A Chown, R Crawford, TM Crites, AT Crocce, M Cunha, CE D'Andrea, CB da Costa, LN Davis, C de Haan, T DeRose, J Desai, S De Vicente, J Diehl, HT Dietrich, JP Dobbs, MA Dodelson, S Doel, P Drlica-Wagner, A Eifler, TF Elvin-Poole, J Everett, WB Flaugher, B Fosalba, P Friedrich, O Frieman, J Garcia-Bellido, J Gatti, M Gaztanaga, E George, EM Gerdes, DW Giannantonio, T Gruen, D Gruendl, RA Gschwend, J Gutierrez, G Halverson, NW Harrington, NL Hartley, WG Holder, GP Hollowood, DL Holzapfel, WL Honscheid, K Hou, Z Hoyle, B Hrubes, JD Huterer, D Jain, B James, DJ Jarvis, M Jeltema, T Johnson, MWG Johnson, MD Kent, S Kirk, D Knox, L Kokron, N Krause, E Kuehn, K Lahav, O Lee, AT Leitch, EM Li, TS Lima, M Lin, H Luong-Van, D MacCrann, N Maia, MAG Manzotti, A 023541 2019-07-26 application/pdf https://escholarship.org/uc/item/9zv6631m unknown eScholarship, University of California qt9zv6631m https://escholarship.org/uc/item/9zv6631m public PHYSICAL REVIEW D, vol 100, iss 2 astro-ph.CO article 2019 ftcdlib 2020-03-06T23:54:37Z We perform a joint analysis of the auto and cross-correlations between three cosmic fields: the galaxy density field, the galaxy weak lensing shear field, and the cosmic microwave background (CMB) weak lensing convergence field. These three fields are measured using roughly 1300 sq. deg. of overlapping optical imaging data from first year observations of the Dark Energy Survey and millimeter-wave observations of the CMB from both the South Pole Telescope Sunyaev-Zel'dovich survey and Planck. We present cosmological constraints from the joint analysis of the two-point correlation functions between galaxy density and galaxy shear with CMB lensing. We test for consistency between these measurements and the DES-only two-point function measurements, finding no evidence for inconsistency in the context of flat $\Lambda$CDM cosmological models. Performing a joint analysis of five of the possible correlation functions between these fields (excluding only the CMB lensing autospectrum) yields $S_{8}\equiv \sigma_8\sqrt{\Omega_{\rm m}/0.3} = 0.782^{+0.019}_{-0.025}$ and $\Omega_{\rm m}=0.260^{+0.029}_{-0.019}$. We test for consistency between these five correlation function measurements and the Planck-only measurement of the CMB lensing autospectrum, again finding no evidence for inconsistency in the context of flat $\Lambda$CDM models. Combining constraints from all six two-point functions yields $S_{8}=0.776^{+0.014}_{-0.021}$ and $\Omega_{\rm m}= 0.271^{+0.022}_{-0.016}$. These results provide a powerful test and confirmation of the results from the first year DES joint-probes analysis. Article in Journal/Newspaper South pole University of California: eScholarship South Pole Lambda ENVELOPE(-62.983,-62.983,-64.300,-64.300)
institution Open Polar
collection University of California: eScholarship
op_collection_id ftcdlib
language unknown
topic astro-ph.CO
spellingShingle astro-ph.CO
Abbott, TMC
Abdalla, FB
Alarcon, A
Allam, S
Annis, J
Avila, S
Aylor, K
Banerji, M
Banik, N
Baxter, EJ
Bechtol, K
Becker, MR
Benson, BA
Bernstein, GM
Bertin, E
Bianchini, F
Blazek, J
Bleem, LE
Bridle, SL
Brooks, D
Buckley-Geer, E
Burke, DL
Carlstrom, JE
Rosell, A Carnero
Kind, M Carrasco
Carretero, J
Castander, FJ
Cawthon, R
Chang, C
Chang, CL
Cho, H-M
Choi, A
Chown, R
Crawford, TM
Crites, AT
Crocce, M
Cunha, CE
D'Andrea, CB
da Costa, LN
Davis, C
de Haan, T
DeRose, J
Desai, S
De Vicente, J
Diehl, HT
Dietrich, JP
Dobbs, MA
Dodelson, S
Doel, P
Drlica-Wagner, A
Eifler, TF
Elvin-Poole, J
Everett, WB
Flaugher, B
Fosalba, P
Friedrich, O
Frieman, J
Garcia-Bellido, J
Gatti, M
Gaztanaga, E
George, EM
Gerdes, DW
Giannantonio, T
Gruen, D
Gruendl, RA
Gschwend, J
Gutierrez, G
Halverson, NW
Harrington, NL
Hartley, WG
Holder, GP
Hollowood, DL
Holzapfel, WL
Honscheid, K
Hou, Z
Hoyle, B
Hrubes, JD
Huterer, D
Jain, B
James, DJ
Jarvis, M
Jeltema, T
Johnson, MWG
Johnson, MD
Kent, S
Kirk, D
Knox, L
Kokron, N
Krause, E
Kuehn, K
Lahav, O
Lee, AT
Leitch, EM
Li, TS
Lima, M
Lin, H
Luong-Van, D
MacCrann, N
Maia, MAG
Manzotti, A
Dark Energy Survey year 1 results: Joint analysis of galaxy clustering, galaxy lensing, and CMB lensing two-point functions
topic_facet astro-ph.CO
description We perform a joint analysis of the auto and cross-correlations between three cosmic fields: the galaxy density field, the galaxy weak lensing shear field, and the cosmic microwave background (CMB) weak lensing convergence field. These three fields are measured using roughly 1300 sq. deg. of overlapping optical imaging data from first year observations of the Dark Energy Survey and millimeter-wave observations of the CMB from both the South Pole Telescope Sunyaev-Zel'dovich survey and Planck. We present cosmological constraints from the joint analysis of the two-point correlation functions between galaxy density and galaxy shear with CMB lensing. We test for consistency between these measurements and the DES-only two-point function measurements, finding no evidence for inconsistency in the context of flat $\Lambda$CDM cosmological models. Performing a joint analysis of five of the possible correlation functions between these fields (excluding only the CMB lensing autospectrum) yields $S_{8}\equiv \sigma_8\sqrt{\Omega_{\rm m}/0.3} = 0.782^{+0.019}_{-0.025}$ and $\Omega_{\rm m}=0.260^{+0.029}_{-0.019}$. We test for consistency between these five correlation function measurements and the Planck-only measurement of the CMB lensing autospectrum, again finding no evidence for inconsistency in the context of flat $\Lambda$CDM models. Combining constraints from all six two-point functions yields $S_{8}=0.776^{+0.014}_{-0.021}$ and $\Omega_{\rm m}= 0.271^{+0.022}_{-0.016}$. These results provide a powerful test and confirmation of the results from the first year DES joint-probes analysis.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Abbott, TMC
Abdalla, FB
Alarcon, A
Allam, S
Annis, J
Avila, S
Aylor, K
Banerji, M
Banik, N
Baxter, EJ
Bechtol, K
Becker, MR
Benson, BA
Bernstein, GM
Bertin, E
Bianchini, F
Blazek, J
Bleem, LE
Bridle, SL
Brooks, D
Buckley-Geer, E
Burke, DL
Carlstrom, JE
Rosell, A Carnero
Kind, M Carrasco
Carretero, J
Castander, FJ
Cawthon, R
Chang, C
Chang, CL
Cho, H-M
Choi, A
Chown, R
Crawford, TM
Crites, AT
Crocce, M
Cunha, CE
D'Andrea, CB
da Costa, LN
Davis, C
de Haan, T
DeRose, J
Desai, S
De Vicente, J
Diehl, HT
Dietrich, JP
Dobbs, MA
Dodelson, S
Doel, P
Drlica-Wagner, A
Eifler, TF
Elvin-Poole, J
Everett, WB
Flaugher, B
Fosalba, P
Friedrich, O
Frieman, J
Garcia-Bellido, J
Gatti, M
Gaztanaga, E
George, EM
Gerdes, DW
Giannantonio, T
Gruen, D
Gruendl, RA
Gschwend, J
Gutierrez, G
Halverson, NW
Harrington, NL
Hartley, WG
Holder, GP
Hollowood, DL
Holzapfel, WL
Honscheid, K
Hou, Z
Hoyle, B
Hrubes, JD
Huterer, D
Jain, B
James, DJ
Jarvis, M
Jeltema, T
Johnson, MWG
Johnson, MD
Kent, S
Kirk, D
Knox, L
Kokron, N
Krause, E
Kuehn, K
Lahav, O
Lee, AT
Leitch, EM
Li, TS
Lima, M
Lin, H
Luong-Van, D
MacCrann, N
Maia, MAG
Manzotti, A
author_facet Abbott, TMC
Abdalla, FB
Alarcon, A
Allam, S
Annis, J
Avila, S
Aylor, K
Banerji, M
Banik, N
Baxter, EJ
Bechtol, K
Becker, MR
Benson, BA
Bernstein, GM
Bertin, E
Bianchini, F
Blazek, J
Bleem, LE
Bridle, SL
Brooks, D
Buckley-Geer, E
Burke, DL
Carlstrom, JE
Rosell, A Carnero
Kind, M Carrasco
Carretero, J
Castander, FJ
Cawthon, R
Chang, C
Chang, CL
Cho, H-M
Choi, A
Chown, R
Crawford, TM
Crites, AT
Crocce, M
Cunha, CE
D'Andrea, CB
da Costa, LN
Davis, C
de Haan, T
DeRose, J
Desai, S
De Vicente, J
Diehl, HT
Dietrich, JP
Dobbs, MA
Dodelson, S
Doel, P
Drlica-Wagner, A
Eifler, TF
Elvin-Poole, J
Everett, WB
Flaugher, B
Fosalba, P
Friedrich, O
Frieman, J
Garcia-Bellido, J
Gatti, M
Gaztanaga, E
George, EM
Gerdes, DW
Giannantonio, T
Gruen, D
Gruendl, RA
Gschwend, J
Gutierrez, G
Halverson, NW
Harrington, NL
Hartley, WG
Holder, GP
Hollowood, DL
Holzapfel, WL
Honscheid, K
Hou, Z
Hoyle, B
Hrubes, JD
Huterer, D
Jain, B
James, DJ
Jarvis, M
Jeltema, T
Johnson, MWG
Johnson, MD
Kent, S
Kirk, D
Knox, L
Kokron, N
Krause, E
Kuehn, K
Lahav, O
Lee, AT
Leitch, EM
Li, TS
Lima, M
Lin, H
Luong-Van, D
MacCrann, N
Maia, MAG
Manzotti, A
author_sort Abbott, TMC
title Dark Energy Survey year 1 results: Joint analysis of galaxy clustering, galaxy lensing, and CMB lensing two-point functions
title_short Dark Energy Survey year 1 results: Joint analysis of galaxy clustering, galaxy lensing, and CMB lensing two-point functions
title_full Dark Energy Survey year 1 results: Joint analysis of galaxy clustering, galaxy lensing, and CMB lensing two-point functions
title_fullStr Dark Energy Survey year 1 results: Joint analysis of galaxy clustering, galaxy lensing, and CMB lensing two-point functions
title_full_unstemmed Dark Energy Survey year 1 results: Joint analysis of galaxy clustering, galaxy lensing, and CMB lensing two-point functions
title_sort dark energy survey year 1 results: joint analysis of galaxy clustering, galaxy lensing, and cmb lensing two-point functions
publisher eScholarship, University of California
publishDate 2019
url https://escholarship.org/uc/item/9zv6631m
op_coverage 023541
long_lat ENVELOPE(-62.983,-62.983,-64.300,-64.300)
geographic South Pole
Lambda
geographic_facet South Pole
Lambda
genre South pole
genre_facet South pole
op_source PHYSICAL REVIEW D, vol 100, iss 2
op_relation qt9zv6631m
https://escholarship.org/uc/item/9zv6631m
op_rights public
_version_ 1766202446952005632