The Northern Hemisphere Extratropical Atmospheric Circulation Response to ENSO: How Well Do We Know It and How Do We Evaluate Models Accordingly?

Application of random sampling techniques to composite differences between 18 El Niño and 14 La Niña events observed since 1920 reveals considerable uncertainty in both the pattern and amplitude of the Northern Hemisphere extratropical winter sea level pressure (SLP) response to ENSO. While the SLP...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Deser, Clara, Simpson, Isla R, McKinnon, Karen A, Phillips, Adam S
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:unknown
Published: eScholarship, University of California 2017
Subjects:
Online Access:https://escholarship.org/uc/item/5318q9vp
id ftcdlib:oai:escholarship.org/ark:/13030/qt5318q9vp
record_format openpolar
spelling ftcdlib:oai:escholarship.org/ark:/13030/qt5318q9vp 2023-05-15T15:13:44+02:00 The Northern Hemisphere Extratropical Atmospheric Circulation Response to ENSO: How Well Do We Know It and How Do We Evaluate Models Accordingly? Deser, Clara Simpson, Isla R McKinnon, Karen A Phillips, Adam S 5059 - 5082 2017-07-01 application/pdf https://escholarship.org/uc/item/5318q9vp unknown eScholarship, University of California qt5318q9vp https://escholarship.org/uc/item/5318q9vp public JOURNAL OF CLIMATE, vol 30, iss 13 Atmospheric Sciences Oceanography Meteorology & Atmospheric Sciences Geomatic Engineering article 2017 ftcdlib 2020-03-06T23:54:37Z Application of random sampling techniques to composite differences between 18 El Niño and 14 La Niña events observed since 1920 reveals considerable uncertainty in both the pattern and amplitude of the Northern Hemisphere extratropical winter sea level pressure (SLP) response to ENSO. While the SLP responses over the North Pacific and North America are robust to sampling variability, their magnitudes can vary by a factor of 2; other regions, such as the Arctic, North Atlantic, and Europe are less robust in their SLP patterns, amplitudes, and statistical significance. The uncertainties on the observed ENSO composite are shown to arise mainly from atmospheric internal variability as opposed to ENSO diversity. These observational findings pose considerable challenges for the evaluation of ENSO teleconnections in models. An approach is proposed that incorporates both pattern and amplitude uncertainty in the observational target, allowing for discrimination between true model biases in the forced ENSO response and apparent model biases that arise from limited sampling of non-ENSO-related internal variability. Large initial-condition coupled model ensembles with realistic tropical Pacific sea surface temperature anomaly evolution during 1920–2013 show similar levels of uncertainty in their ENSO teleconnections as found in observations. Because the set of ENSO events in each of the model composites is the same (and identical to that in observations), these uncertainties are entirely attributable to sampling fluctuations arising from internal variability, which is shown to originate from atmospheric processes. The initial-condition model ensembles thus inform the interpretation of the single observed ENSO composite and vice versa. Article in Journal/Newspaper Arctic North Atlantic University of California: eScholarship Arctic Pacific
institution Open Polar
collection University of California: eScholarship
op_collection_id ftcdlib
language unknown
topic Atmospheric Sciences
Oceanography
Meteorology & Atmospheric Sciences
Geomatic Engineering
spellingShingle Atmospheric Sciences
Oceanography
Meteorology & Atmospheric Sciences
Geomatic Engineering
Deser, Clara
Simpson, Isla R
McKinnon, Karen A
Phillips, Adam S
The Northern Hemisphere Extratropical Atmospheric Circulation Response to ENSO: How Well Do We Know It and How Do We Evaluate Models Accordingly?
topic_facet Atmospheric Sciences
Oceanography
Meteorology & Atmospheric Sciences
Geomatic Engineering
description Application of random sampling techniques to composite differences between 18 El Niño and 14 La Niña events observed since 1920 reveals considerable uncertainty in both the pattern and amplitude of the Northern Hemisphere extratropical winter sea level pressure (SLP) response to ENSO. While the SLP responses over the North Pacific and North America are robust to sampling variability, their magnitudes can vary by a factor of 2; other regions, such as the Arctic, North Atlantic, and Europe are less robust in their SLP patterns, amplitudes, and statistical significance. The uncertainties on the observed ENSO composite are shown to arise mainly from atmospheric internal variability as opposed to ENSO diversity. These observational findings pose considerable challenges for the evaluation of ENSO teleconnections in models. An approach is proposed that incorporates both pattern and amplitude uncertainty in the observational target, allowing for discrimination between true model biases in the forced ENSO response and apparent model biases that arise from limited sampling of non-ENSO-related internal variability. Large initial-condition coupled model ensembles with realistic tropical Pacific sea surface temperature anomaly evolution during 1920–2013 show similar levels of uncertainty in their ENSO teleconnections as found in observations. Because the set of ENSO events in each of the model composites is the same (and identical to that in observations), these uncertainties are entirely attributable to sampling fluctuations arising from internal variability, which is shown to originate from atmospheric processes. The initial-condition model ensembles thus inform the interpretation of the single observed ENSO composite and vice versa.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Deser, Clara
Simpson, Isla R
McKinnon, Karen A
Phillips, Adam S
author_facet Deser, Clara
Simpson, Isla R
McKinnon, Karen A
Phillips, Adam S
author_sort Deser, Clara
title The Northern Hemisphere Extratropical Atmospheric Circulation Response to ENSO: How Well Do We Know It and How Do We Evaluate Models Accordingly?
title_short The Northern Hemisphere Extratropical Atmospheric Circulation Response to ENSO: How Well Do We Know It and How Do We Evaluate Models Accordingly?
title_full The Northern Hemisphere Extratropical Atmospheric Circulation Response to ENSO: How Well Do We Know It and How Do We Evaluate Models Accordingly?
title_fullStr The Northern Hemisphere Extratropical Atmospheric Circulation Response to ENSO: How Well Do We Know It and How Do We Evaluate Models Accordingly?
title_full_unstemmed The Northern Hemisphere Extratropical Atmospheric Circulation Response to ENSO: How Well Do We Know It and How Do We Evaluate Models Accordingly?
title_sort northern hemisphere extratropical atmospheric circulation response to enso: how well do we know it and how do we evaluate models accordingly?
publisher eScholarship, University of California
publishDate 2017
url https://escholarship.org/uc/item/5318q9vp
op_coverage 5059 - 5082
geographic Arctic
Pacific
geographic_facet Arctic
Pacific
genre Arctic
North Atlantic
genre_facet Arctic
North Atlantic
op_source JOURNAL OF CLIMATE, vol 30, iss 13
op_relation qt5318q9vp
https://escholarship.org/uc/item/5318q9vp
op_rights public
_version_ 1766344263256244224