Comments on: "Glacial lake evolution and Atlantic-Pacific drainage reversals during deglaciation of the Patagonia ice sheet" by Thorndycraft et al. [Quat. Sci. Rev. 203 (2019), 102-127]
International audience Underlying the scientific method developed by Thorndycraft et al. (2019, T19 hereafter) for the morphological analysis is the idea that producing a large enough landform dataset treated statistically would facilitate quantification of regional isostatic rebound together with t...
Published in: | Quaternary Science Reviews |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Other Authors: | , |
Format: | Article in Journal/Newspaper |
Language: | English |
Published: |
HAL CCSD
2019
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://insu.hal.science/insu-03595784 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quascirev.2019.03.036 |
Summary: | International audience Underlying the scientific method developed by Thorndycraft et al. (2019, T19 hereafter) for the morphological analysis is the idea that producing a large enough landform dataset treated statistically would facilitate quantification of regional isostatic rebound together with the reconstruction of the Lago Chalenko paleolake history. Also, they associate the landform dataset to a Bayesian modeling of ages. This Comment adresses 5 key points questionning the proposed assumptions. |
---|