The enigma of the Předmostí protodogs. A comment on Prassack et al. 2020
International audience Prassack et al. (2020) analyzed dental microwear in a sample of canids from the Gravettian site of Předmostí that had been identified as either Paleolithic dogs or Pleistocene wolves (n = 10 in each group), accepting that the morphological differences between the groups validl...
Published in: | Journal of Archaeological Science |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , |
Other Authors: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Article in Journal/Newspaper |
Language: | English |
Published: |
HAL CCSD
2021
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-03363663 https://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-03363663/document https://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-03363663/file/The%20enigma%20of%20the%20P%C5%99edmost%C3%AD%20protodogs.pdf https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jas.2020.105160 |
id |
ftccsdartic:oai:HAL:halshs-03363663v1 |
---|---|
record_format |
openpolar |
spelling |
ftccsdartic:oai:HAL:halshs-03363663v1 2023-05-15T15:50:38+02:00 The enigma of the Předmostí protodogs. A comment on Prassack et al. 2020 Janssens, Luc A. A. Boudadi-Maligne, Myriam Mech, L. David Lawler, Dennis Universiteit Gent = Ghent University Belgium (UGENT) Universiteit Leiden Leiden De la Préhistoire à l'Actuel : Culture, Environnement et Anthropologie (PACEA) Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Université de Bordeaux (UB) US Geological Survey Jamestown United States Geological Survey Reston (USGS) Illinois State Museum 2021 https://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-03363663 https://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-03363663/document https://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-03363663/file/The%20enigma%20of%20the%20P%C5%99edmost%C3%AD%20protodogs.pdf https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jas.2020.105160 en eng HAL CCSD Elsevier info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1016/j.jas.2020.105160 halshs-03363663 https://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-03363663 https://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-03363663/document https://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-03363663/file/The%20enigma%20of%20the%20P%C5%99edmost%C3%AD%20protodogs.pdf doi:10.1016/j.jas.2020.105160 ISSN: 0305-4403 EISSN: 1095-9238 Journal of Archaeological Science https://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-03363663 Journal of Archaeological Science, Elsevier, 2021, 126, pp.105160. ⟨10.1016/j.jas.2020.105160⟩ Dog Microwear Domestication Wolf Canis lupus [SHS.ARCHEO]Humanities and Social Sciences/Archaeology and Prehistory info:eu-repo/semantics/article Journal articles 2021 ftccsdartic https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jas.2020.105160 2021-11-27T23:37:44Z International audience Prassack et al. (2020) analyzed dental microwear in a sample of canids from the Gravettian site of Předmostí that had been identified as either Paleolithic dogs or Pleistocene wolves (n = 10 in each group), accepting that the morphological differences between the groups validly distinguished the (self-domesticating) protodogs from wolves. The authors then concluded that differences in one m2 microwear pattern separated those groups and indicated enhanced anthropogenic based durophagy in the putative protodogs. The study also inferred protodog diets from another isotope study.We disagree with this report for several reasons. First morphological criteria (skull and mandible) accepted here to distinguish the groups have been challenged based on robust research and can be explained by variability within wolves. Thus, we reject that one of the groups represents protodogs. We also question why only ten specimens were examined in each group, while about 130 were available in the original study, and why no specimen-selection criteria were reported. The study accepts the self-domestication hypothesis, which we reject based on solid knowledge of wolf behavior and inferences about what prey remains would be available, and where, in a hunter-gatherer setting. In summary, we can neither accept the existence of protodogs, nor the proposed difference in m2 microwear as being related to anthropogenic durophagy. Article in Journal/Newspaper Canis lupus Archive ouverte HAL (Hyper Article en Ligne, CCSD - Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe) Journal of Archaeological Science 126 105160 |
institution |
Open Polar |
collection |
Archive ouverte HAL (Hyper Article en Ligne, CCSD - Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe) |
op_collection_id |
ftccsdartic |
language |
English |
topic |
Dog Microwear Domestication Wolf Canis lupus [SHS.ARCHEO]Humanities and Social Sciences/Archaeology and Prehistory |
spellingShingle |
Dog Microwear Domestication Wolf Canis lupus [SHS.ARCHEO]Humanities and Social Sciences/Archaeology and Prehistory Janssens, Luc A. A. Boudadi-Maligne, Myriam Mech, L. David Lawler, Dennis The enigma of the Předmostí protodogs. A comment on Prassack et al. 2020 |
topic_facet |
Dog Microwear Domestication Wolf Canis lupus [SHS.ARCHEO]Humanities and Social Sciences/Archaeology and Prehistory |
description |
International audience Prassack et al. (2020) analyzed dental microwear in a sample of canids from the Gravettian site of Předmostí that had been identified as either Paleolithic dogs or Pleistocene wolves (n = 10 in each group), accepting that the morphological differences between the groups validly distinguished the (self-domesticating) protodogs from wolves. The authors then concluded that differences in one m2 microwear pattern separated those groups and indicated enhanced anthropogenic based durophagy in the putative protodogs. The study also inferred protodog diets from another isotope study.We disagree with this report for several reasons. First morphological criteria (skull and mandible) accepted here to distinguish the groups have been challenged based on robust research and can be explained by variability within wolves. Thus, we reject that one of the groups represents protodogs. We also question why only ten specimens were examined in each group, while about 130 were available in the original study, and why no specimen-selection criteria were reported. The study accepts the self-domestication hypothesis, which we reject based on solid knowledge of wolf behavior and inferences about what prey remains would be available, and where, in a hunter-gatherer setting. In summary, we can neither accept the existence of protodogs, nor the proposed difference in m2 microwear as being related to anthropogenic durophagy. |
author2 |
Universiteit Gent = Ghent University Belgium (UGENT) Universiteit Leiden Leiden De la Préhistoire à l'Actuel : Culture, Environnement et Anthropologie (PACEA) Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Université de Bordeaux (UB) US Geological Survey Jamestown United States Geological Survey Reston (USGS) Illinois State Museum |
format |
Article in Journal/Newspaper |
author |
Janssens, Luc A. A. Boudadi-Maligne, Myriam Mech, L. David Lawler, Dennis |
author_facet |
Janssens, Luc A. A. Boudadi-Maligne, Myriam Mech, L. David Lawler, Dennis |
author_sort |
Janssens, Luc A. A. |
title |
The enigma of the Předmostí protodogs. A comment on Prassack et al. 2020 |
title_short |
The enigma of the Předmostí protodogs. A comment on Prassack et al. 2020 |
title_full |
The enigma of the Předmostí protodogs. A comment on Prassack et al. 2020 |
title_fullStr |
The enigma of the Předmostí protodogs. A comment on Prassack et al. 2020 |
title_full_unstemmed |
The enigma of the Předmostí protodogs. A comment on Prassack et al. 2020 |
title_sort |
enigma of the předmostí protodogs. a comment on prassack et al. 2020 |
publisher |
HAL CCSD |
publishDate |
2021 |
url |
https://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-03363663 https://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-03363663/document https://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-03363663/file/The%20enigma%20of%20the%20P%C5%99edmost%C3%AD%20protodogs.pdf https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jas.2020.105160 |
genre |
Canis lupus |
genre_facet |
Canis lupus |
op_source |
ISSN: 0305-4403 EISSN: 1095-9238 Journal of Archaeological Science https://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-03363663 Journal of Archaeological Science, Elsevier, 2021, 126, pp.105160. ⟨10.1016/j.jas.2020.105160⟩ |
op_relation |
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1016/j.jas.2020.105160 halshs-03363663 https://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-03363663 https://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-03363663/document https://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-03363663/file/The%20enigma%20of%20the%20P%C5%99edmost%C3%AD%20protodogs.pdf doi:10.1016/j.jas.2020.105160 |
op_doi |
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jas.2020.105160 |
container_title |
Journal of Archaeological Science |
container_volume |
126 |
container_start_page |
105160 |
_version_ |
1766385633543061504 |