An AeroCom assessment of black carbon in Arctic snow and sea ice

International audience Though many global aerosols models prognose surface deposition, only a few models have been used to directly simulate the radiative effect from black carbon (BC) deposition to snow and sea ice. Here, we apply aerosol de-position fields from 25 models contributing to two phases...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
Main Authors: Jiao, C, Flanner, M. G., Balkanski, Yves, Bauer, S. E., Bellouin, N., Berntsen, T. K., Bian, H., Carslaw, K. S., Chin, M., De Luca, N, Diehl, T, Ghan, S. J., Iversen, T., Kirkevåg, A., Koch, D, Liu, X., Mann, G. W., Penner, J. E., Pitari, G., Schulz, M, Seland, O., Skeie, R, Steenrod, S. D., Stier, P, Takemura, T., Tsigaridis, K, Van Noije, T, Yun, Y, Zhang, K
Other Authors: National Center for Atmospheric Research Boulder (NCAR), Laboratoire des Sciences du Climat et de l'Environnement Gif-sur-Yvette (LSCE), Institut national des sciences de l'Univers (INSU - CNRS)-Université Paris-Saclay-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Commissariat à l'énergie atomique et aux énergies alternatives (CEA)-Université de Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines (UVSQ), Modelling the Earth Response to Multiple Anthropogenic Interactions and Dynamics (MERMAID), Institut national des sciences de l'Univers (INSU - CNRS)-Université Paris-Saclay-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Commissariat à l'énergie atomique et aux énergies alternatives (CEA)-Université de Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines (UVSQ)-Institut national des sciences de l'Univers (INSU - CNRS)-Université Paris-Saclay-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Commissariat à l'énergie atomique et aux énergies alternatives (CEA)-Université de Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines (UVSQ), University of Maryland Baltimore, School of Earth and Environment Leeds (SEE), University of Leeds, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL), University of Oslo (UiO), University of Michigan Ann Arbor, University of Michigan System
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: HAL CCSD 2014
Subjects:
Online Access:https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02872355
https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02872355/document
https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02872355/file/Jiao2014_ACP.pdf
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-2399-2014
Description
Summary:International audience Though many global aerosols models prognose surface deposition, only a few models have been used to directly simulate the radiative effect from black carbon (BC) deposition to snow and sea ice. Here, we apply aerosol de-position fields from 25 models contributing to two phases of the Aerosol Comparisons between Observations and Models (AeroCom) project to simulate and evaluate within-snow BC concentrations and radiative effect in the Arctic. We accomplish this by driving the offline land and sea ice components of the Community Earth System Model with different deposition fields and meteorological conditions from 2004 to 2009, during which an extensive field campaign of BC measurements in Arctic snow occurred. We find that models generally underestimate BC concentrations in snow in northern Russia and Norway, while overestimating BC amounts elsewhere in the Arctic. Although simulated BC distributions in snow are poorly correlated with measurements , mean values are reasonable. The multi-model mean (range) bias in BC concentrations, sampled over the same grid cells, snow depths, and months of measurements, are −4.4 (−13.2 to +10.7) ng g −1 for an earlier phase of Aero-Com models (phase I), and +4.1 (−13.0 to +21.4) ng g −1 Published by Copernicus Publications on behalf of the European Geosciences Union. 2400 C. Jiao et al.: Black carbon in Arctic snow assessment for a more recent phase of AeroCom models (phase II), compared to the observational mean of 19.2 ng g −1. Factors determining model BC concentrations in Arctic snow include Arctic BC emissions, transport of extra-Arctic aerosols, precipitation , deposition efficiency of aerosols within the Arc-tic, and meltwater removal of particles in snow. Sensitivity studies show that the model-measurement evaluation is only weakly affected by meltwater scavenging efficiency because most measurements were conducted in non-melting snow. The Arctic (60-90 • N) atmospheric residence time for BC in phase II models ranges from 3.7 to 23.2 days, ...