Sectoral approaches to improve regional carbon budgets
International audience Humans utilise about 40% of the earth's net primary production (NPP) but the products of this NPP are often managed by different sectors, with timber and forest products managed by the forestry sector and food and fibre products from croplands and grasslands managed by th...
Published in: | Climatic Change |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Other Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article in Journal/Newspaper |
Language: | English |
Published: |
HAL CCSD
2008
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://hal.inrae.fr/hal-02664925 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-007-9378-5 |
id |
ftccsdartic:oai:HAL:hal-02664925v1 |
---|---|
record_format |
openpolar |
institution |
Open Polar |
collection |
Archive ouverte HAL (Hyper Article en Ligne, CCSD - Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe) |
op_collection_id |
ftccsdartic |
language |
English |
topic |
[SDE.MCG]Environmental Sciences/Global Changes [SDE.BE]Environmental Sciences/Biodiversity and Ecology |
spellingShingle |
[SDE.MCG]Environmental Sciences/Global Changes [SDE.BE]Environmental Sciences/Biodiversity and Ecology Smith, Pete Nabuurs, Gert-Jan Janssens, Ivan A. Reis, Stephan Marland, Gregg Soussana, Jean-François, Christensen, Torben R. Heath, Linda Apps, Mike Alexeyev, Vlady Fang, Jingyun Gattuso, Jean-Pierre Guerschman, Juan Pablo Huang, Yao Jobbagy, Esteban Murdiyarso, Daniel Ni, Jian Nobre, Antonio Peng, Changhui Walcroft, Adrian Wang, Shao Quiang Pan, Yude Zhou, Guang Sheng Sectoral approaches to improve regional carbon budgets |
topic_facet |
[SDE.MCG]Environmental Sciences/Global Changes [SDE.BE]Environmental Sciences/Biodiversity and Ecology |
description |
International audience Humans utilise about 40% of the earth's net primary production (NPP) but the products of this NPP are often managed by different sectors, with timber and forest products managed by the forestry sector and food and fibre products from croplands and grasslands managed by the agricultural sector. Other significant anthropogenic impacts on the global carbon cycle include human utilization of fossil fuels and impacts on less intensively managed systems such as peatlands, wetlands and permafrost. A great deal of knowledge, expertise and data is available within each sector. We describe the contribution of sectoral carbon budgets to our understanding of the global carbon cycle. Whilst many sectors exhibit similarities for carbon budgeting, some key differences arise due to differences in goods and services provided, ecology, management practices used, land-management personnel responsible, policies affecting land management, data types and availability, and the drivers of change. We review the methods and data sources available for assessing sectoral carbon budgets, and describe some of key data limitations and uncertainties for each sector in different regions of the world. We identify the main gaps in our knowledge/data, show that coverage is better for the developed world for most sectors, and suggest how sectoral carbon budgets could be improved in the future. Research priorities include the development of shared protocols through site networks, a move to full carbon accounting within sectors, and the assessment of full greenhouse gas budgets. |
author2 |
School of Biological Sciences University of Aberdeen Alterra Wageningen University and Research Wageningen (WUR) Department of Biology University of Antwerp (UA) Natural Environment Research Council (NERC) Division of Environmental Sciences University of Hertfordshire Hatfield (UH) Mid Sweden University UR 0874 Unité de recherche sur l'Ecosystème Prairial Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique (INRA)-Unité de recherche sur l'Ecosystème Prairial (UREP)-Ecologie des Forêts, Prairies et milieux Aquatiques (EFPA) Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique (INRA) Lund University Lund United States Department of Agriculture Pacific Forestry Centre Natural Resources Canada (NRCan) Russian Academy of Sciences Moscow (RAS) Peking University Beijing Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS) Land and Water Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation Canberra (CSIRO) Institute of Atmospheric Physics Beijing (IAP) Chinese Academy of Sciences Beijing (CAS) National University of San Luis Partenaires INRAE Center for International Forestry Research (CIFOR) Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research CGIAR (CGIAR) Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS) Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas Espaciais (INPE) Université de Québec Manaaki Whenua – Landcare Research Lincoln Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research (IGSNRR) United States Department of Agriculture - US Forest Service |
format |
Article in Journal/Newspaper |
author |
Smith, Pete Nabuurs, Gert-Jan Janssens, Ivan A. Reis, Stephan Marland, Gregg Soussana, Jean-François, Christensen, Torben R. Heath, Linda Apps, Mike Alexeyev, Vlady Fang, Jingyun Gattuso, Jean-Pierre Guerschman, Juan Pablo Huang, Yao Jobbagy, Esteban Murdiyarso, Daniel Ni, Jian Nobre, Antonio Peng, Changhui Walcroft, Adrian Wang, Shao Quiang Pan, Yude Zhou, Guang Sheng |
author_facet |
Smith, Pete Nabuurs, Gert-Jan Janssens, Ivan A. Reis, Stephan Marland, Gregg Soussana, Jean-François, Christensen, Torben R. Heath, Linda Apps, Mike Alexeyev, Vlady Fang, Jingyun Gattuso, Jean-Pierre Guerschman, Juan Pablo Huang, Yao Jobbagy, Esteban Murdiyarso, Daniel Ni, Jian Nobre, Antonio Peng, Changhui Walcroft, Adrian Wang, Shao Quiang Pan, Yude Zhou, Guang Sheng |
author_sort |
Smith, Pete |
title |
Sectoral approaches to improve regional carbon budgets |
title_short |
Sectoral approaches to improve regional carbon budgets |
title_full |
Sectoral approaches to improve regional carbon budgets |
title_fullStr |
Sectoral approaches to improve regional carbon budgets |
title_full_unstemmed |
Sectoral approaches to improve regional carbon budgets |
title_sort |
sectoral approaches to improve regional carbon budgets |
publisher |
HAL CCSD |
publishDate |
2008 |
url |
https://hal.inrae.fr/hal-02664925 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-007-9378-5 |
genre |
permafrost |
genre_facet |
permafrost |
op_source |
ISSN: 0165-0009 EISSN: 1573-1480 Climatic Change https://hal.inrae.fr/hal-02664925 Climatic Change, Springer Verlag, 2008, 88 (3-4), pp.209-249. ⟨10.1007/s10584-007-9378-5⟩ http://link.springer.com/journal/10584/88/3/page/1 |
op_relation |
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1007/s10584-007-9378-5 hal-02664925 https://hal.inrae.fr/hal-02664925 doi:10.1007/s10584-007-9378-5 PRODINRA: 199652 WOS: 000256476100001 |
op_doi |
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-007-9378-5 |
container_title |
Climatic Change |
container_volume |
88 |
container_issue |
3-4 |
container_start_page |
209 |
op_container_end_page |
249 |
_version_ |
1766166499680059392 |
spelling |
ftccsdartic:oai:HAL:hal-02664925v1 2023-05-15T17:57:59+02:00 Sectoral approaches to improve regional carbon budgets Smith, Pete Nabuurs, Gert-Jan Janssens, Ivan A. Reis, Stephan Marland, Gregg Soussana, Jean-François, Christensen, Torben R. Heath, Linda Apps, Mike Alexeyev, Vlady Fang, Jingyun Gattuso, Jean-Pierre Guerschman, Juan Pablo Huang, Yao Jobbagy, Esteban Murdiyarso, Daniel Ni, Jian Nobre, Antonio Peng, Changhui Walcroft, Adrian Wang, Shao Quiang Pan, Yude Zhou, Guang Sheng School of Biological Sciences University of Aberdeen Alterra Wageningen University and Research Wageningen (WUR) Department of Biology University of Antwerp (UA) Natural Environment Research Council (NERC) Division of Environmental Sciences University of Hertfordshire Hatfield (UH) Mid Sweden University UR 0874 Unité de recherche sur l'Ecosystème Prairial Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique (INRA)-Unité de recherche sur l'Ecosystème Prairial (UREP)-Ecologie des Forêts, Prairies et milieux Aquatiques (EFPA) Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique (INRA) Lund University Lund United States Department of Agriculture Pacific Forestry Centre Natural Resources Canada (NRCan) Russian Academy of Sciences Moscow (RAS) Peking University Beijing Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS) Land and Water Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation Canberra (CSIRO) Institute of Atmospheric Physics Beijing (IAP) Chinese Academy of Sciences Beijing (CAS) National University of San Luis Partenaires INRAE Center for International Forestry Research (CIFOR) Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research CGIAR (CGIAR) Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS) Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas Espaciais (INPE) Université de Québec Manaaki Whenua – Landcare Research Lincoln Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research (IGSNRR) United States Department of Agriculture - US Forest Service 2008 https://hal.inrae.fr/hal-02664925 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-007-9378-5 en eng HAL CCSD Springer Verlag info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1007/s10584-007-9378-5 hal-02664925 https://hal.inrae.fr/hal-02664925 doi:10.1007/s10584-007-9378-5 PRODINRA: 199652 WOS: 000256476100001 ISSN: 0165-0009 EISSN: 1573-1480 Climatic Change https://hal.inrae.fr/hal-02664925 Climatic Change, Springer Verlag, 2008, 88 (3-4), pp.209-249. ⟨10.1007/s10584-007-9378-5⟩ http://link.springer.com/journal/10584/88/3/page/1 [SDE.MCG]Environmental Sciences/Global Changes [SDE.BE]Environmental Sciences/Biodiversity and Ecology info:eu-repo/semantics/article Journal articles 2008 ftccsdartic https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-007-9378-5 2021-09-04T22:50:40Z International audience Humans utilise about 40% of the earth's net primary production (NPP) but the products of this NPP are often managed by different sectors, with timber and forest products managed by the forestry sector and food and fibre products from croplands and grasslands managed by the agricultural sector. Other significant anthropogenic impacts on the global carbon cycle include human utilization of fossil fuels and impacts on less intensively managed systems such as peatlands, wetlands and permafrost. A great deal of knowledge, expertise and data is available within each sector. We describe the contribution of sectoral carbon budgets to our understanding of the global carbon cycle. Whilst many sectors exhibit similarities for carbon budgeting, some key differences arise due to differences in goods and services provided, ecology, management practices used, land-management personnel responsible, policies affecting land management, data types and availability, and the drivers of change. We review the methods and data sources available for assessing sectoral carbon budgets, and describe some of key data limitations and uncertainties for each sector in different regions of the world. We identify the main gaps in our knowledge/data, show that coverage is better for the developed world for most sectors, and suggest how sectoral carbon budgets could be improved in the future. Research priorities include the development of shared protocols through site networks, a move to full carbon accounting within sectors, and the assessment of full greenhouse gas budgets. Article in Journal/Newspaper permafrost Archive ouverte HAL (Hyper Article en Ligne, CCSD - Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe) Climatic Change 88 3-4 209 249 |