Improving radical innovation methods for strategy making – Learning from practitioners’ evaluations of practical guidelines for C-K tools
International audience ➢Objectives and theoretical and practical relevance (with Brief literature mapping and key references)Radical innovation (RI) developments suppose a dynamic capability of firm organized within a major innovation system (O’Connor, 08; O’Connor and DeMartino, 2006). Indeed, RI p...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Other Authors: | , , , |
Format: | Conference Object |
Language: | English |
Published: |
HAL CCSD
2017
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://hal-mines-paristech.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01477302 |
id |
ftccsdartic:oai:HAL:hal-01477302v1 |
---|---|
record_format |
openpolar |
spelling |
ftccsdartic:oai:HAL:hal-01477302v1 2023-05-15T16:52:22+02:00 Improving radical innovation methods for strategy making – Learning from practitioners’ evaluations of practical guidelines for C-K tools Hooge, Sophie Agogué, Marine Centre de Gestion Scientifique i3 (CGS i3) MINES ParisTech - École nationale supérieure des mines de Paris Université Paris sciences et lettres (PSL)-Université Paris sciences et lettres (PSL)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS) HEC Montréal (HEC Montréal) Reykjavik, Iceland 2017-06-11 https://hal-mines-paristech.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01477302 en eng HAL CCSD hal-01477302 https://hal-mines-paristech.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01477302 Innovation and Product Development Management Conference https://hal-mines-paristech.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01477302 Innovation and Product Development Management Conference, Jun 2017, Reykjavik, Iceland C-K design theory radical innovation methods Innovation strategy making practical guidelines C-K tools [SHS.GESTION]Humanities and Social Sciences/Business administration info:eu-repo/semantics/conferenceObject Conference papers 2017 ftccsdartic 2021-11-21T02:32:59Z International audience ➢Objectives and theoretical and practical relevance (with Brief literature mapping and key references)Radical innovation (RI) developments suppose a dynamic capability of firm organized within a major innovation system (O’Connor, 08; O’Connor and DeMartino, 2006). Indeed, RI presents the dual challenge for firms to be disruptive from the existent offers on the markets and to require new knowledge to be developed by NPD departments. Researchers and practitioners have proposed numerous methods to support collectives in radical innovation development. Some of them focus on business value creation, — as Business model canvas (Osterwalder and Pigneur, 2010), Blue Ocean Strategy (Kim and Mauborgne, 2005), Design thinking (Brown, 2008), etc. Others deal with the renewal of firms’ skills and associated knowledge management, as TRIZ, ASIT (Horowitz 1999 Reich et al, 2012), or most conceptual guidelines referring to best practices, as Open Innovation (Chesbrough, 2006) or innovation-based corporate entrepreneurship (Kelley et al, 2009). Yet, few of them gather with same attention to both renewal processes: thus, weaknesses appear in the strategy making process either in the robustness of the value creation proposal or in the design feasibility. To overcome this complex issue, design theory researchers assumed that Concept-Knowledge (C-K) theory could be used to support such a dual exploration (Hatchuel et al, 2002). Indeed, in this theoretical conceptualization of RI strategies, the Concept space contains proposals of value creation with various degrees of elaboration (“Desirable unknown” that foreshadows the value proposal), while the Knowledge space contains all types properties that could be validated by a repeatable test, even if they are still lacking at the moment of the exploration (“true or false properties” that gathers design parameters of objects). According to (Hatchuel et al, 2014), C-K diagrams are used in industry for innovative projects evaluation, evaluating a portfolio and its ... Conference Object Iceland Archive ouverte HAL (Hyper Article en Ligne, CCSD - Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe) |
institution |
Open Polar |
collection |
Archive ouverte HAL (Hyper Article en Ligne, CCSD - Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe) |
op_collection_id |
ftccsdartic |
language |
English |
topic |
C-K design theory radical innovation methods Innovation strategy making practical guidelines C-K tools [SHS.GESTION]Humanities and Social Sciences/Business administration |
spellingShingle |
C-K design theory radical innovation methods Innovation strategy making practical guidelines C-K tools [SHS.GESTION]Humanities and Social Sciences/Business administration Hooge, Sophie Agogué, Marine Improving radical innovation methods for strategy making – Learning from practitioners’ evaluations of practical guidelines for C-K tools |
topic_facet |
C-K design theory radical innovation methods Innovation strategy making practical guidelines C-K tools [SHS.GESTION]Humanities and Social Sciences/Business administration |
description |
International audience ➢Objectives and theoretical and practical relevance (with Brief literature mapping and key references)Radical innovation (RI) developments suppose a dynamic capability of firm organized within a major innovation system (O’Connor, 08; O’Connor and DeMartino, 2006). Indeed, RI presents the dual challenge for firms to be disruptive from the existent offers on the markets and to require new knowledge to be developed by NPD departments. Researchers and practitioners have proposed numerous methods to support collectives in radical innovation development. Some of them focus on business value creation, — as Business model canvas (Osterwalder and Pigneur, 2010), Blue Ocean Strategy (Kim and Mauborgne, 2005), Design thinking (Brown, 2008), etc. Others deal with the renewal of firms’ skills and associated knowledge management, as TRIZ, ASIT (Horowitz 1999 Reich et al, 2012), or most conceptual guidelines referring to best practices, as Open Innovation (Chesbrough, 2006) or innovation-based corporate entrepreneurship (Kelley et al, 2009). Yet, few of them gather with same attention to both renewal processes: thus, weaknesses appear in the strategy making process either in the robustness of the value creation proposal or in the design feasibility. To overcome this complex issue, design theory researchers assumed that Concept-Knowledge (C-K) theory could be used to support such a dual exploration (Hatchuel et al, 2002). Indeed, in this theoretical conceptualization of RI strategies, the Concept space contains proposals of value creation with various degrees of elaboration (“Desirable unknown” that foreshadows the value proposal), while the Knowledge space contains all types properties that could be validated by a repeatable test, even if they are still lacking at the moment of the exploration (“true or false properties” that gathers design parameters of objects). According to (Hatchuel et al, 2014), C-K diagrams are used in industry for innovative projects evaluation, evaluating a portfolio and its ... |
author2 |
Centre de Gestion Scientifique i3 (CGS i3) MINES ParisTech - École nationale supérieure des mines de Paris Université Paris sciences et lettres (PSL)-Université Paris sciences et lettres (PSL)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS) HEC Montréal (HEC Montréal) |
format |
Conference Object |
author |
Hooge, Sophie Agogué, Marine |
author_facet |
Hooge, Sophie Agogué, Marine |
author_sort |
Hooge, Sophie |
title |
Improving radical innovation methods for strategy making – Learning from practitioners’ evaluations of practical guidelines for C-K tools |
title_short |
Improving radical innovation methods for strategy making – Learning from practitioners’ evaluations of practical guidelines for C-K tools |
title_full |
Improving radical innovation methods for strategy making – Learning from practitioners’ evaluations of practical guidelines for C-K tools |
title_fullStr |
Improving radical innovation methods for strategy making – Learning from practitioners’ evaluations of practical guidelines for C-K tools |
title_full_unstemmed |
Improving radical innovation methods for strategy making – Learning from practitioners’ evaluations of practical guidelines for C-K tools |
title_sort |
improving radical innovation methods for strategy making – learning from practitioners’ evaluations of practical guidelines for c-k tools |
publisher |
HAL CCSD |
publishDate |
2017 |
url |
https://hal-mines-paristech.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01477302 |
op_coverage |
Reykjavik, Iceland |
genre |
Iceland |
genre_facet |
Iceland |
op_source |
Innovation and Product Development Management Conference https://hal-mines-paristech.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01477302 Innovation and Product Development Management Conference, Jun 2017, Reykjavik, Iceland |
op_relation |
hal-01477302 https://hal-mines-paristech.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01477302 |
_version_ |
1766042549033631744 |