Deciphering the structure of the West Greenland marine food web using stable isotopes (δ13C, δ15N)

• Published in: Marine Biology
• Main Authors: Linnebjerg, Jannie, Hobson, Keith A., Fort, Jérôme, Nielsen, Torkel, Møller, Per, Wieland, Kai, Rigét, Frank, Mosbech, Anders
• Other Authors: Department of Biological Sciences, Aarhus University, Environment and Climate Change Canada, LIttoral ENvironnement et Sociétés - UMRi 7266 (LIENSs), Université de La Rochelle (ULR)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Greenland Climate Research Centre, Greenland Institute for Natural Resources (GINR), National Institute of Aquatic Resources, Technical University of Denmark Lyngby (DTU), Kalundborg Municipality, Department of Bioscience and Arctic Research Center, Aarhus University Aarhus
• Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
• Language: English
• Published: HAL CCSD 2016
• Subjects: [SDE.BE]Environmental Sciences/Biodiversity and Ecology; Arctic; Greenland; Chionoecetes opilio; Snow crab; Ursus maritimus; Copepods
• Online Access: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01426370; https://doi.org/10.1007/s00227-016-3001-0

International audience The Arctic is facing major environmental changes impacting marine biodiversity and ecosystem functioning. One way of assessing the responses of an ecosystem to these changes is to quantitatively study food web dynamics. Here, we used stable isotope (δ15N and δ13C) analyses of 39 Arctic marine species to investigate trophic relationships and isotopic niches of the West Greenland food web in 2000–2004. The lowest δ15N values were found for suspension feeding blue mussel (Mytilus edulis; 6.1 ‰) and the highest for polar bear (Ursus maritimus; 20.2 ‰). For δ13C, copepods (Calanus spp.) had the lowest values (−20.4 ‰) and snow crab (Chionoecetes opilio) the highest values (−15.8 ‰). Our results show that the three trophic enrichment factor (TEF) approaches used to quantify species trophic positions (fixed TEF of 3.8 and 3.4 ‰ or scaled TEF) did not generally affect trophic modelling and provided similar conclusions. Overall, the findings in this study are in good agreement with previous investigations of other Arctic marine ecosystems. Interestingly, we found little overlap of core isotopic niches used by the four investigated functional groups (mammals, seabirds, fish and invertebrates), except for seabirds and fish where an overlap of 24 % was found. These results provide new insights into species and functional group interactions, as well as into the food web structure and ecosystem functioning of an important Arctic region that can be used as a template to guide future modelling of carbon, energy and contaminant flow in the region.