Chemical fingerprints reveal clues to identity, heterozygosity, and relatedness.
International audience Olfaction is a key sense for mammals, and as a result chemical signals are an important means of communication for most mammalian species. It has long been established that most mammals make, distribute, and respond to chemosignals in a range of contexts, including reproductio...
Published in: | Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Other Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article in Journal/Newspaper |
Language: | English |
Published: |
HAL CCSD
2015
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01306654 https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1514278112 |
id |
ftccsdartic:oai:HAL:hal-01306654v1 |
---|---|
record_format |
openpolar |
spelling |
ftccsdartic:oai:HAL:hal-01306654v1 2023-05-15T13:45:46+02:00 Chemical fingerprints reveal clues to identity, heterozygosity, and relatedness. Pitcher, Benjamin J. Charrier, Isabelle Harcourt, Robert G. Department of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Science and Engineering Institut des Neurosciences Paris-Saclay (NeuroPSI) Université Paris-Sud - Paris 11 (UP11)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS) 2015-09-08 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01306654 https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1514278112 en eng HAL CCSD National Academy of Sciences info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/pmid/26311844 info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1073/pnas.1514278112 hal-01306654 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01306654 PUBMED: 26311844 doi:10.1073/pnas.1514278112 PUBMEDCENTRAL: PMC4568672 ISSN: 0027-8424 EISSN: 1091-6490 Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01306654 Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America , National Academy of Sciences, 2015, 112 (36), pp.11146-7. ⟨10.1073/pnas.1514278112⟩ MESH: Animals MESH: Fur Seals MESH: Genetic Variation MESH: Microsatellite Repeats MESH: Skin [SDV.NEU.NB]Life Sciences [q-bio]/Neurons and Cognition [q-bio.NC]/Neurobiology [SDV.NEU.PC]Life Sciences [q-bio]/Neurons and Cognition [q-bio.NC]/Psychology and behavior [SDV.NEU.SC]Life Sciences [q-bio]/Neurons and Cognition [q-bio.NC]/Cognitive Sciences info:eu-repo/semantics/article Journal articles 2015 ftccsdartic https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1514278112 2021-07-04T01:14:36Z International audience Olfaction is a key sense for mammals, and as a result chemical signals are an important means of communication for most mammalian species. It has long been established that most mammals make, distribute, and respond to chemosignals in a range of contexts, including reproduction, parent–offspring interactions, and social relationships (1). However, most aquatic mammals are unable to use olfaction when foraging, and evidence for its role in social behavior has been equivocal. Historically, reports in the literature have ranged from describing the semiaquatic pinnipeds as microsmatic (2) to those that have observed the high prevalence of naso-nasal inspection during social interactions (Fig. 1), and so inferred an important role for olfactory recognition (3). It is only recently that we experimentally confirmed in wild Australian sea lions that olfactory cues are a reliable mechanism in offspring recognition even in the absence of other sensory cues (4). Similarly, new experimental evidence in other large, wild mammals indicates the importance of olfactory cues in discrimination of potential mates and competitors as well as kin (5⇓–7). However, perhaps due to both the complexity of working with natural vertebrate populations and the complexity of vertebrate scents, the mechanistic basis of chemical communication has received little study (8). In PNAS, Stoffel et al. (9) provide an important advance in the understanding of chemical communication in wild mammals. They compared genetic similarity and the chemical profiles of Antarctic fur seals in two colonies. In so doing they revealed that individual-specific chemical fingerprints have both inherited and environmental components and seem to encode mother–offspring similarity, heterozygosity, and genetic relatedness. The implications of these findings for chemical communication in wild mammals are profound. Article in Journal/Newspaper Antarc* Antarctic Antarctic Fur Seals Archive ouverte HAL (Hyper Article en Ligne, CCSD - Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe) Antarctic Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 112 36 11146 11147 |
institution |
Open Polar |
collection |
Archive ouverte HAL (Hyper Article en Ligne, CCSD - Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe) |
op_collection_id |
ftccsdartic |
language |
English |
topic |
MESH: Animals MESH: Fur Seals MESH: Genetic Variation MESH: Microsatellite Repeats MESH: Skin [SDV.NEU.NB]Life Sciences [q-bio]/Neurons and Cognition [q-bio.NC]/Neurobiology [SDV.NEU.PC]Life Sciences [q-bio]/Neurons and Cognition [q-bio.NC]/Psychology and behavior [SDV.NEU.SC]Life Sciences [q-bio]/Neurons and Cognition [q-bio.NC]/Cognitive Sciences |
spellingShingle |
MESH: Animals MESH: Fur Seals MESH: Genetic Variation MESH: Microsatellite Repeats MESH: Skin [SDV.NEU.NB]Life Sciences [q-bio]/Neurons and Cognition [q-bio.NC]/Neurobiology [SDV.NEU.PC]Life Sciences [q-bio]/Neurons and Cognition [q-bio.NC]/Psychology and behavior [SDV.NEU.SC]Life Sciences [q-bio]/Neurons and Cognition [q-bio.NC]/Cognitive Sciences Pitcher, Benjamin J. Charrier, Isabelle Harcourt, Robert G. Chemical fingerprints reveal clues to identity, heterozygosity, and relatedness. |
topic_facet |
MESH: Animals MESH: Fur Seals MESH: Genetic Variation MESH: Microsatellite Repeats MESH: Skin [SDV.NEU.NB]Life Sciences [q-bio]/Neurons and Cognition [q-bio.NC]/Neurobiology [SDV.NEU.PC]Life Sciences [q-bio]/Neurons and Cognition [q-bio.NC]/Psychology and behavior [SDV.NEU.SC]Life Sciences [q-bio]/Neurons and Cognition [q-bio.NC]/Cognitive Sciences |
description |
International audience Olfaction is a key sense for mammals, and as a result chemical signals are an important means of communication for most mammalian species. It has long been established that most mammals make, distribute, and respond to chemosignals in a range of contexts, including reproduction, parent–offspring interactions, and social relationships (1). However, most aquatic mammals are unable to use olfaction when foraging, and evidence for its role in social behavior has been equivocal. Historically, reports in the literature have ranged from describing the semiaquatic pinnipeds as microsmatic (2) to those that have observed the high prevalence of naso-nasal inspection during social interactions (Fig. 1), and so inferred an important role for olfactory recognition (3). It is only recently that we experimentally confirmed in wild Australian sea lions that olfactory cues are a reliable mechanism in offspring recognition even in the absence of other sensory cues (4). Similarly, new experimental evidence in other large, wild mammals indicates the importance of olfactory cues in discrimination of potential mates and competitors as well as kin (5⇓–7). However, perhaps due to both the complexity of working with natural vertebrate populations and the complexity of vertebrate scents, the mechanistic basis of chemical communication has received little study (8). In PNAS, Stoffel et al. (9) provide an important advance in the understanding of chemical communication in wild mammals. They compared genetic similarity and the chemical profiles of Antarctic fur seals in two colonies. In so doing they revealed that individual-specific chemical fingerprints have both inherited and environmental components and seem to encode mother–offspring similarity, heterozygosity, and genetic relatedness. The implications of these findings for chemical communication in wild mammals are profound. |
author2 |
Department of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Science and Engineering Institut des Neurosciences Paris-Saclay (NeuroPSI) Université Paris-Sud - Paris 11 (UP11)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS) |
format |
Article in Journal/Newspaper |
author |
Pitcher, Benjamin J. Charrier, Isabelle Harcourt, Robert G. |
author_facet |
Pitcher, Benjamin J. Charrier, Isabelle Harcourt, Robert G. |
author_sort |
Pitcher, Benjamin J. |
title |
Chemical fingerprints reveal clues to identity, heterozygosity, and relatedness. |
title_short |
Chemical fingerprints reveal clues to identity, heterozygosity, and relatedness. |
title_full |
Chemical fingerprints reveal clues to identity, heterozygosity, and relatedness. |
title_fullStr |
Chemical fingerprints reveal clues to identity, heterozygosity, and relatedness. |
title_full_unstemmed |
Chemical fingerprints reveal clues to identity, heterozygosity, and relatedness. |
title_sort |
chemical fingerprints reveal clues to identity, heterozygosity, and relatedness. |
publisher |
HAL CCSD |
publishDate |
2015 |
url |
https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01306654 https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1514278112 |
geographic |
Antarctic |
geographic_facet |
Antarctic |
genre |
Antarc* Antarctic Antarctic Fur Seals |
genre_facet |
Antarc* Antarctic Antarctic Fur Seals |
op_source |
ISSN: 0027-8424 EISSN: 1091-6490 Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01306654 Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America , National Academy of Sciences, 2015, 112 (36), pp.11146-7. ⟨10.1073/pnas.1514278112⟩ |
op_relation |
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/pmid/26311844 info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1073/pnas.1514278112 hal-01306654 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01306654 PUBMED: 26311844 doi:10.1073/pnas.1514278112 PUBMEDCENTRAL: PMC4568672 |
op_doi |
https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1514278112 |
container_title |
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences |
container_volume |
112 |
container_issue |
36 |
container_start_page |
11146 |
op_container_end_page |
11147 |
_version_ |
1766230618673250304 |