Can a handicapped parent rely on its partner ? An experimental study within Adélie penguin pairs

• Published in: Animal Behaviour
• Main Authors: Beaulieu, Michaël, Raclot, Thierry, Dervaux, Antoine, Le Maho, Yvon, Ropert‐coudert, Yan, Ancel, André
• Other Authors: Département Ecologie, Physiologie et Ethologie (DEPE-IPHC), Institut Pluridisciplinaire Hubert Curien (IPHC), Université Louis Pasteur - Strasbourg I-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Université Louis Pasteur - Strasbourg I-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)
• Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
• Language: English
• Published: HAL CCSD 2009
• Subjects: Adélie penguin; begging; biparental care; breeding effort; chick; compensation; Pygoscelis adeliae; [SDE.BE]Environmental Sciences/Biodiversity and Ecology; [SDV.BID.EVO]Life Sciences [q-bio]/Biodiversity/Populations and Evolution [q-bio.PE]
• Online Access: https://hal.science/hal-00401574; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2009.05.006

International audience In biparental species, the response of parents when their mates are disadvantaged is highly variable. Moreover, experimental studies on parental effort have mainly focused on short-lived birds whose breeding constraints largely differ from those of long-lived species such as seabirds. We investigated the short- and long-term consequences of handicapping one parent within Ade´ lie penguin, Pygoscelis adeliae, pairs. We also examined whether handicapped mates and offspring could convey cues informing the other parent of the need to increase breeding effort and whether this parent adjusted its behaviour accordingly. While handicapped penguins foraged for longer and lost more mass than controls, partners, fasting for longer at the nest, did not change their behaviour or lose more mass suggesting that they compensated at least for themselves. Information exchange was increased between mates after the return of handicapped females from foraging. However, partner males did not respond to this. Handicapped- pair chicks, which were smaller than control chicks, did not increase their solicitation rate for food. In the subsequent breeding season, compared to controls, 40% of previously handicapped females laid fewer eggs, the resight rate of previously handicapped males was lower and pair instability was higher. No additional cues seemed to be detected by Ade´ lie penguins when their mates were handicapped and, for handicapped-pair offspring, the cost associated wih a higher solicitation rate was probably too high for these small chicks to support. Consequently, we found no compensatory behaviour from partners in this long-lived species: handicapped individuals and offspring both supported the whole additional cost in both the short term and the long term.