Crustal thermal state and origin of silicic magma in Iceland: the case of Torfajo¨ kull, Ljo´ sufjo¨ ll and Snæfellsjo¨ kull volcanoes
International audience Pleistocene and Holocene peralkaline rhyolites from Torfajo¨ kull (South Iceland Volcanic Zone) and Ljo´ sufjo¨ ll central volcanoes and trachytes from Snæfellsjo¨ kull (Snæfellsnes Volcanic Zone) allow the assessment of the mechanism for silicic magma genesis as a function of...
Published in: | Contributions to Mineralogy and Petrology |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , |
Other Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article in Journal/Newspaper |
Language: | English |
Published: |
HAL CCSD
2007
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00329576 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00410-006-0165-5 |
Summary: | International audience Pleistocene and Holocene peralkaline rhyolites from Torfajo¨ kull (South Iceland Volcanic Zone) and Ljo´ sufjo¨ ll central volcanoes and trachytes from Snæfellsjo¨ kull (Snæfellsnes Volcanic Zone) allow the assessment of the mechanism for silicic magma genesis as a function of geographical location and crustal geothermal gradient. The low d18O (2.4&) and low Sr concentration (12.2 ppm) measured in Torfajo¨ kull rhyolites are best explained by partial melting of hydrated metabasaltic crust followed by major fractionation of feldspar. In contrast, very high 87Sr/86Sr (0.70473) and low Ba (8.7 ppm) and Sr (1.2 ppm) concentrations measured in Ljo´ sufjo¨ ll silicic lavas are best explained by fractional crystallisation and subsequent 87Rb decay. Snæfellsjo¨ kull trachytes are also generated by fractional crystallisation, with less than 10% crustal assimilation, as inferred from their d18O. The fact that silicic magmas within, or close to, the rift zone are principally generated by crustal melting whereas those from off-rift zones are better explained by fractional crystallisation clearly illustrates the controlling influence of the thermal state of the crust on silicic magma genesis in Iceland. |
---|