High resolution simulation of recent Arctic and Antarctic stratospheric chemical ozone loss compared to observations

Simulations of polar ozone losses were performed using the three-dimensional high-resolution (1∘ × 1∘) chemical transport model MIMOSA-CHIM. Three Arctic winters 1999–2000, 2001–2002, 2002–2003 and three Antarctic winters 2001, 2002, and 2003 were considered for the study. The cumulative ozone loss...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of Atmospheric Chemistry
Main Authors: Tripathi, Om Prakash, Godin-Beekmann, Sophie, Lefèvre, Franck, Marchand, Marion, Pazmino, Andrea, Hauchecorne, Alain, Goutail, Florence, Schlager, Hans, Volk, Michael, Johnson, B., König-Langlo, G., Balestri, Stefano, Stroh, Fred, Bui, T.P., Jost, H.J., Deshler, T., Von Der Gathen, Peter
Other Authors: Service d'aéronomie (SA), Université de Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines (UVSQ)-Université Pierre et Marie Curie - Paris 6 (UPMC)-Institut national des sciences de l'Univers (INSU - CNRS)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL), NASA-California Institute of Technology (CALTECH), DLR Institut für Physik der Atmosphäre (IPA), Deutsches Zentrum für Luft- und Raumfahrt Oberpfaffenhofen-Wessling (DLR), Institut für Atmosphäre und Umwelt Frankfurt/Main (IAU), Goethe-Universität Frankfurt am Main, NOAA Climate Monitoring and Diagnostics Laboratory (CMDL), National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Alfred-Wegener-Institut, Helmholtz-Zentrum für Polar- und Meeresforschung (AWI), ABR, Inc. - Environmental Research and Services, Institut für Chemie und Dynamik der Geosphäre - Stratosphäre (ICG-1), Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH, Helmholtz-Gemeinschaft = Helmholtz Association-Helmholtz-Gemeinschaft = Helmholtz Association, NASA Ames Research Center (ARC), Bay Area Environmental Research Institute (BAER), Department of Atmospheric Science Laramie, University of Wyoming (UW)
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: HAL CCSD 2006
Subjects:
Online Access:https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00141732
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10874-006-9028-8
id ftccsdartic:oai:HAL:hal-00141732v1
record_format openpolar
institution Open Polar
collection Archive ouverte HAL (Hyper Article en Ligne, CCSD - Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe)
op_collection_id ftccsdartic
language English
topic Sensitivity tests
Polar ozone
Ozone loss
Stratospheric chemistry
Comparison with observations
High-resolution 3-D chemical transport model
[PHYS.PHYS.PHYS-AO-PH]Physics [physics]/Physics [physics]/Atmospheric and Oceanic Physics [physics.ao-ph]
spellingShingle Sensitivity tests
Polar ozone
Ozone loss
Stratospheric chemistry
Comparison with observations
High-resolution 3-D chemical transport model
[PHYS.PHYS.PHYS-AO-PH]Physics [physics]/Physics [physics]/Atmospheric and Oceanic Physics [physics.ao-ph]
Tripathi, Om Prakash
Godin-Beekmann, Sophie
Lefèvre, Franck
Marchand, Marion
Pazmino, Andrea
Hauchecorne, Alain
Goutail, Florence
Schlager, Hans
Volk, Michael
Johnson, B.
König-Langlo, G.
Balestri, Stefano
Stroh, Fred
Bui, T.P.
Jost, H.J.
Deshler, T.
Von Der Gathen, Peter
High resolution simulation of recent Arctic and Antarctic stratospheric chemical ozone loss compared to observations
topic_facet Sensitivity tests
Polar ozone
Ozone loss
Stratospheric chemistry
Comparison with observations
High-resolution 3-D chemical transport model
[PHYS.PHYS.PHYS-AO-PH]Physics [physics]/Physics [physics]/Atmospheric and Oceanic Physics [physics.ao-ph]
description Simulations of polar ozone losses were performed using the three-dimensional high-resolution (1∘ × 1∘) chemical transport model MIMOSA-CHIM. Three Arctic winters 1999–2000, 2001–2002, 2002–2003 and three Antarctic winters 2001, 2002, and 2003 were considered for the study. The cumulative ozone loss in the Arctic winter 2002–2003 reached around 35% at 475 K inside the vortex, as compared to more than 60% in 1999–2000. During 1999–2000, denitrification induces a maximum of about 23% extra ozone loss at 475 K as compared to 17% in 2002–2003. Unlike these two colder Arctic winters, the 2001–2002 Arctic was warmer and did not experience much ozone loss. Sensitivity tests showed that the chosen resolution of 1∘ × 1∘ provides a better evaluation of ozone loss at the edge of the polar vortex in high solar zenith angle conditions. The simulation results for ozone, ClO, HNO3, N2O, and NO y for winters 1999–2000 and 2002–2003 were compared with measurements on board ER-2 and Geophysica aircraft respectively. Sensitivity tests showed that increasing heating rates calculated by the model by 50% and doubling the PSC (Polar Stratospheric Clouds) particle density (from 5 × 10−3 to 10−2 cm−3) refines the agreement with in situ ozone, N2O and NO y levels. In this configuration, simulated ClO levels are increased and are in better agreement with observations in January but are overestimated by about 20% in March. The use of the Burkholder et al. (1990) Cl2O2 absorption cross-sections slightly increases further ClO levels especially in high solar zenith angle conditions. Comparisons of the modelled ozone values with ozonesonde measurement in the Antarctic winter 2003 and with Polar Ozone and Aerosol Measurement III (POAM III) measurements in the Antarctic winters 2001 and 2002, shows that the simulations underestimate the ozone loss rate at the end of the ozone destruction period. A slightly better agreement is obtained with the use of Burkholder et al. (1990) Cl2O2 absorption cross-sections.
author2 Service d'aéronomie (SA)
Université de Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines (UVSQ)-Université Pierre et Marie Curie - Paris 6 (UPMC)-Institut national des sciences de l'Univers (INSU - CNRS)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)
Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL)
NASA-California Institute of Technology (CALTECH)
DLR Institut für Physik der Atmosphäre (IPA)
Deutsches Zentrum für Luft- und Raumfahrt Oberpfaffenhofen-Wessling (DLR)
Institut für Atmosphäre und Umwelt Frankfurt/Main (IAU)
Goethe-Universität Frankfurt am Main
NOAA Climate Monitoring and Diagnostics Laboratory (CMDL)
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)
Alfred-Wegener-Institut, Helmholtz-Zentrum für Polar- und Meeresforschung (AWI)
ABR, Inc. - Environmental Research and Services
Institut für Chemie und Dynamik der Geosphäre - Stratosphäre (ICG-1)
Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH
Helmholtz-Gemeinschaft = Helmholtz Association-Helmholtz-Gemeinschaft = Helmholtz Association
NASA Ames Research Center (ARC)
Bay Area Environmental Research Institute (BAER)
Department of Atmospheric Science Laramie
University of Wyoming (UW)
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Tripathi, Om Prakash
Godin-Beekmann, Sophie
Lefèvre, Franck
Marchand, Marion
Pazmino, Andrea
Hauchecorne, Alain
Goutail, Florence
Schlager, Hans
Volk, Michael
Johnson, B.
König-Langlo, G.
Balestri, Stefano
Stroh, Fred
Bui, T.P.
Jost, H.J.
Deshler, T.
Von Der Gathen, Peter
author_facet Tripathi, Om Prakash
Godin-Beekmann, Sophie
Lefèvre, Franck
Marchand, Marion
Pazmino, Andrea
Hauchecorne, Alain
Goutail, Florence
Schlager, Hans
Volk, Michael
Johnson, B.
König-Langlo, G.
Balestri, Stefano
Stroh, Fred
Bui, T.P.
Jost, H.J.
Deshler, T.
Von Der Gathen, Peter
author_sort Tripathi, Om Prakash
title High resolution simulation of recent Arctic and Antarctic stratospheric chemical ozone loss compared to observations
title_short High resolution simulation of recent Arctic and Antarctic stratospheric chemical ozone loss compared to observations
title_full High resolution simulation of recent Arctic and Antarctic stratospheric chemical ozone loss compared to observations
title_fullStr High resolution simulation of recent Arctic and Antarctic stratospheric chemical ozone loss compared to observations
title_full_unstemmed High resolution simulation of recent Arctic and Antarctic stratospheric chemical ozone loss compared to observations
title_sort high resolution simulation of recent arctic and antarctic stratospheric chemical ozone loss compared to observations
publisher HAL CCSD
publishDate 2006
url https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00141732
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10874-006-9028-8
geographic Arctic
Antarctic
The Antarctic
geographic_facet Arctic
Antarctic
The Antarctic
genre Antarc*
Antarctic
Arctic
genre_facet Antarc*
Antarctic
Arctic
op_source ISSN: 0167-7764
EISSN: 1573-0662
Journal of Atmospheric Chemistry
https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00141732
Journal of Atmospheric Chemistry, Springer Verlag, 2006, 55 (3), pp.205-226. ⟨10.1007/s10874-006-9028-8⟩
op_relation info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1007/s10874-006-9028-8
hal-00141732
https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00141732
doi:10.1007/s10874-006-9028-8
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1007/s10874-006-9028-8
container_title Journal of Atmospheric Chemistry
container_volume 55
container_issue 3
container_start_page 205
op_container_end_page 226
_version_ 1766271041521319936
spelling ftccsdartic:oai:HAL:hal-00141732v1 2023-05-15T14:01:20+02:00 High resolution simulation of recent Arctic and Antarctic stratospheric chemical ozone loss compared to observations Tripathi, Om Prakash Godin-Beekmann, Sophie Lefèvre, Franck Marchand, Marion Pazmino, Andrea Hauchecorne, Alain Goutail, Florence Schlager, Hans Volk, Michael Johnson, B. König-Langlo, G. Balestri, Stefano Stroh, Fred Bui, T.P. Jost, H.J. Deshler, T. Von Der Gathen, Peter Service d'aéronomie (SA) Université de Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines (UVSQ)-Université Pierre et Marie Curie - Paris 6 (UPMC)-Institut national des sciences de l'Univers (INSU - CNRS)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS) Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL) NASA-California Institute of Technology (CALTECH) DLR Institut für Physik der Atmosphäre (IPA) Deutsches Zentrum für Luft- und Raumfahrt Oberpfaffenhofen-Wessling (DLR) Institut für Atmosphäre und Umwelt Frankfurt/Main (IAU) Goethe-Universität Frankfurt am Main NOAA Climate Monitoring and Diagnostics Laboratory (CMDL) National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) Alfred-Wegener-Institut, Helmholtz-Zentrum für Polar- und Meeresforschung (AWI) ABR, Inc. - Environmental Research and Services Institut für Chemie und Dynamik der Geosphäre - Stratosphäre (ICG-1) Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH Helmholtz-Gemeinschaft = Helmholtz Association-Helmholtz-Gemeinschaft = Helmholtz Association NASA Ames Research Center (ARC) Bay Area Environmental Research Institute (BAER) Department of Atmospheric Science Laramie University of Wyoming (UW) 2006 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00141732 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10874-006-9028-8 en eng HAL CCSD Springer Verlag info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1007/s10874-006-9028-8 hal-00141732 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00141732 doi:10.1007/s10874-006-9028-8 ISSN: 0167-7764 EISSN: 1573-0662 Journal of Atmospheric Chemistry https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00141732 Journal of Atmospheric Chemistry, Springer Verlag, 2006, 55 (3), pp.205-226. ⟨10.1007/s10874-006-9028-8⟩ Sensitivity tests Polar ozone Ozone loss Stratospheric chemistry Comparison with observations High-resolution 3-D chemical transport model [PHYS.PHYS.PHYS-AO-PH]Physics [physics]/Physics [physics]/Atmospheric and Oceanic Physics [physics.ao-ph] info:eu-repo/semantics/article Journal articles 2006 ftccsdartic https://doi.org/10.1007/s10874-006-9028-8 2021-12-19T04:21:22Z Simulations of polar ozone losses were performed using the three-dimensional high-resolution (1∘ × 1∘) chemical transport model MIMOSA-CHIM. Three Arctic winters 1999–2000, 2001–2002, 2002–2003 and three Antarctic winters 2001, 2002, and 2003 were considered for the study. The cumulative ozone loss in the Arctic winter 2002–2003 reached around 35% at 475 K inside the vortex, as compared to more than 60% in 1999–2000. During 1999–2000, denitrification induces a maximum of about 23% extra ozone loss at 475 K as compared to 17% in 2002–2003. Unlike these two colder Arctic winters, the 2001–2002 Arctic was warmer and did not experience much ozone loss. Sensitivity tests showed that the chosen resolution of 1∘ × 1∘ provides a better evaluation of ozone loss at the edge of the polar vortex in high solar zenith angle conditions. The simulation results for ozone, ClO, HNO3, N2O, and NO y for winters 1999–2000 and 2002–2003 were compared with measurements on board ER-2 and Geophysica aircraft respectively. Sensitivity tests showed that increasing heating rates calculated by the model by 50% and doubling the PSC (Polar Stratospheric Clouds) particle density (from 5 × 10−3 to 10−2 cm−3) refines the agreement with in situ ozone, N2O and NO y levels. In this configuration, simulated ClO levels are increased and are in better agreement with observations in January but are overestimated by about 20% in March. The use of the Burkholder et al. (1990) Cl2O2 absorption cross-sections slightly increases further ClO levels especially in high solar zenith angle conditions. Comparisons of the modelled ozone values with ozonesonde measurement in the Antarctic winter 2003 and with Polar Ozone and Aerosol Measurement III (POAM III) measurements in the Antarctic winters 2001 and 2002, shows that the simulations underestimate the ozone loss rate at the end of the ozone destruction period. A slightly better agreement is obtained with the use of Burkholder et al. (1990) Cl2O2 absorption cross-sections. Article in Journal/Newspaper Antarc* Antarctic Arctic Archive ouverte HAL (Hyper Article en Ligne, CCSD - Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe) Arctic Antarctic The Antarctic Journal of Atmospheric Chemistry 55 3 205 226