Behavioural lateralization in a detour test is not repeatable in fishes
Behavioural lateralization, the asymmetric expression of cognitive functions, is reported to enhance key fitness-relevant traits such as group coordination, multitasking and predator escape. Therefore, studies reporting negative effects on lateralization in fish due to environmental stressors such a...
Published in: | Animal Behaviour |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article in Journal/Newspaper |
Language: | English |
Published: |
2020
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://ir.library.carleton.ca/pub/27455 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2020.06.025 |
id |
ftcarletonunivir:oai:carleton.ca:27455 |
---|---|
record_format |
openpolar |
spelling |
ftcarletonunivir:oai:carleton.ca:27455 2023-05-15T17:51:39+02:00 Behavioural lateralization in a detour test is not repeatable in fishes Roche, D.G. (Dominique G.) Amcoff, M. (Mirjam) Morgan, R. (Rachael) Sundin, J. (Josefin) Andreassen, A.H. (Anna H.) Finnøen, M.H. (Mette H.) Lawrence, M.J. (Michael J.) Henderson, E. (Eleanor) Norin, T. (Tommy) Speers-Roesch, B. (Ben) Brown, C. (Culum) Clark, T.D. (Timothy D.) Bshary, R. (Redouan) Leung, B. (Brian) Jutfelt, F. (Fredrik) Binning, S.A. (Sandra A.) 2020-09-01 https://ir.library.carleton.ca/pub/27455 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2020.06.025 en eng https://ir.library.carleton.ca/pub/27455 doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2020.06.025 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess Animal Behaviour vol. 167, pp. 55-64 behavioural plasticity laterality lateralization repeatability T-maze info:eu-repo/semantics/article 2020 ftcarletonunivir https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2020.06.025 2022-02-06T21:49:03Z Behavioural lateralization, the asymmetric expression of cognitive functions, is reported to enhance key fitness-relevant traits such as group coordination, multitasking and predator escape. Therefore, studies reporting negative effects on lateralization in fish due to environmental stressors such as ocean acidification, hypoxia and pollutants are worrisome. However, such studies tend to use a detour test and focus on population level measures, without validating whether lateralization is consistent within individuals across time. We conducted a multispecies, international assessment of the repeatability (R) of lateralization in four previously studied fish species using a detour test (T-maze), a common method for testing lateralization. We also reanalysed a published data set on a fifth species using new statistical methods. We expected the three shoaling species to exhibit greater within-individual consistency in lateralization than their nonshoaling counterparts given previous reports of stronger lateralization in group-living fishes. Absolute and relative lateralization scores were highly nonrepeatable in all five species (0.01<R<0.08), irrespective of their shoaling status. We carefully reviewed 31 published studies in which the detour test was employed to examine lateralization in fish and identified statistical issues in all of them. We develop and propose new statistical analyses to test for population and individual level lateralization. The commonly used detour test does not appear to be appropriate for quantifying behavioural lateralization in fishes, calling into question functional inferences drawn by many published studies, including our own. Potential fitness benefits of lateralization and anthropogenic effects on lateralization as a proxy for adaptive brain functioning need to be assessed with alternative paradigms. Article in Journal/Newspaper Ocean acidification Carleton University's Institutional Repository Detour ENVELOPE(-63.913,-63.913,-65.021,-65.021) The Detour ENVELOPE(-134.704,-134.704,62.733,62.733) Animal Behaviour 167 55 64 |
institution |
Open Polar |
collection |
Carleton University's Institutional Repository |
op_collection_id |
ftcarletonunivir |
language |
English |
topic |
behavioural plasticity laterality lateralization repeatability T-maze |
spellingShingle |
behavioural plasticity laterality lateralization repeatability T-maze Roche, D.G. (Dominique G.) Amcoff, M. (Mirjam) Morgan, R. (Rachael) Sundin, J. (Josefin) Andreassen, A.H. (Anna H.) Finnøen, M.H. (Mette H.) Lawrence, M.J. (Michael J.) Henderson, E. (Eleanor) Norin, T. (Tommy) Speers-Roesch, B. (Ben) Brown, C. (Culum) Clark, T.D. (Timothy D.) Bshary, R. (Redouan) Leung, B. (Brian) Jutfelt, F. (Fredrik) Binning, S.A. (Sandra A.) Behavioural lateralization in a detour test is not repeatable in fishes |
topic_facet |
behavioural plasticity laterality lateralization repeatability T-maze |
description |
Behavioural lateralization, the asymmetric expression of cognitive functions, is reported to enhance key fitness-relevant traits such as group coordination, multitasking and predator escape. Therefore, studies reporting negative effects on lateralization in fish due to environmental stressors such as ocean acidification, hypoxia and pollutants are worrisome. However, such studies tend to use a detour test and focus on population level measures, without validating whether lateralization is consistent within individuals across time. We conducted a multispecies, international assessment of the repeatability (R) of lateralization in four previously studied fish species using a detour test (T-maze), a common method for testing lateralization. We also reanalysed a published data set on a fifth species using new statistical methods. We expected the three shoaling species to exhibit greater within-individual consistency in lateralization than their nonshoaling counterparts given previous reports of stronger lateralization in group-living fishes. Absolute and relative lateralization scores were highly nonrepeatable in all five species (0.01<R<0.08), irrespective of their shoaling status. We carefully reviewed 31 published studies in which the detour test was employed to examine lateralization in fish and identified statistical issues in all of them. We develop and propose new statistical analyses to test for population and individual level lateralization. The commonly used detour test does not appear to be appropriate for quantifying behavioural lateralization in fishes, calling into question functional inferences drawn by many published studies, including our own. Potential fitness benefits of lateralization and anthropogenic effects on lateralization as a proxy for adaptive brain functioning need to be assessed with alternative paradigms. |
format |
Article in Journal/Newspaper |
author |
Roche, D.G. (Dominique G.) Amcoff, M. (Mirjam) Morgan, R. (Rachael) Sundin, J. (Josefin) Andreassen, A.H. (Anna H.) Finnøen, M.H. (Mette H.) Lawrence, M.J. (Michael J.) Henderson, E. (Eleanor) Norin, T. (Tommy) Speers-Roesch, B. (Ben) Brown, C. (Culum) Clark, T.D. (Timothy D.) Bshary, R. (Redouan) Leung, B. (Brian) Jutfelt, F. (Fredrik) Binning, S.A. (Sandra A.) |
author_facet |
Roche, D.G. (Dominique G.) Amcoff, M. (Mirjam) Morgan, R. (Rachael) Sundin, J. (Josefin) Andreassen, A.H. (Anna H.) Finnøen, M.H. (Mette H.) Lawrence, M.J. (Michael J.) Henderson, E. (Eleanor) Norin, T. (Tommy) Speers-Roesch, B. (Ben) Brown, C. (Culum) Clark, T.D. (Timothy D.) Bshary, R. (Redouan) Leung, B. (Brian) Jutfelt, F. (Fredrik) Binning, S.A. (Sandra A.) |
author_sort |
Roche, D.G. (Dominique G.) |
title |
Behavioural lateralization in a detour test is not repeatable in fishes |
title_short |
Behavioural lateralization in a detour test is not repeatable in fishes |
title_full |
Behavioural lateralization in a detour test is not repeatable in fishes |
title_fullStr |
Behavioural lateralization in a detour test is not repeatable in fishes |
title_full_unstemmed |
Behavioural lateralization in a detour test is not repeatable in fishes |
title_sort |
behavioural lateralization in a detour test is not repeatable in fishes |
publishDate |
2020 |
url |
https://ir.library.carleton.ca/pub/27455 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2020.06.025 |
long_lat |
ENVELOPE(-63.913,-63.913,-65.021,-65.021) ENVELOPE(-134.704,-134.704,62.733,62.733) |
geographic |
Detour The Detour |
geographic_facet |
Detour The Detour |
genre |
Ocean acidification |
genre_facet |
Ocean acidification |
op_source |
Animal Behaviour vol. 167, pp. 55-64 |
op_relation |
https://ir.library.carleton.ca/pub/27455 doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2020.06.025 |
op_rights |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
op_doi |
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2020.06.025 |
container_title |
Animal Behaviour |
container_volume |
167 |
container_start_page |
55 |
op_container_end_page |
64 |
_version_ |
1766158860361400320 |