Implementation of U.S. policy in the Arctic.

A tremendous change in the Arctic climate is causing far-reaching impacts on every nation and on the Earth as a whole. The recent changes in the Arctic create numerous areas of interest for the United States, largely driven by national security and economic goals. Given the multiple US interests in...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Jordan, Teri L.
Format: Text
Language:unknown
Published: Fort Leavenworth, KS : US Army Command and General Staff College 2013
Subjects:
Online Access:http://cgsc.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/p4013coll3/id/3021
id ftcarl:oai:cgsc.contentdm.oclc.org:p4013coll3/3021
record_format openpolar
spelling ftcarl:oai:cgsc.contentdm.oclc.org:p4013coll3/3021 2024-06-09T07:42:51+00:00 Implementation of U.S. policy in the Arctic. Jordan, Teri L. School of Advanced Military Studies Monographs 2013-05-23 PDF; Adobe Acrobat Reader required; 83 p.; 1.87 MB. http://cgsc.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/p4013coll3/id/3021 unknown Fort Leavenworth, KS : US Army Command and General Staff College Command and General Staff College (CGSC), School of Advanced Military Studies (SAMS) Monograph Combined Arms Research Library Combined Arms Research Library Digital Library http://cgsc.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/p4013coll3/id/3021 Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. The opinions and conclusions expressed herein are those of the student-authors and do not necessarily represent the views of the U.S. Army Command and General Staff College or any other governmental agency. (References to these studies should include the foregoing statement.) Arctic regions National security Environmental issues Economics United States Government National interest -- United States Textual 2013 ftcarl 2024-05-15T11:17:15Z A tremendous change in the Arctic climate is causing far-reaching impacts on every nation and on the Earth as a whole. The recent changes in the Arctic create numerous areas of interest for the United States, largely driven by national security and economic goals. Given the multiple US interests in the Arctic, in January 2009, President George W. Bush published a national Arctic strategy: National Security Presidential Directive 66 - Homeland Security Presidential Directive 25 (NSPD 66/HSPD 25). Thereafter, numerous departments and agencies developed their supporting Arctic strategies and conducted studies, assessments, and research. However, the United States has failed to put forth the effort and funding necessary to implement its national strategy as laid out by NSPD 66/HSPD 25. An examination of the national policy, along with the various department and agency policies, exposes the intricacies and shallowness of the different assorted Arctic policies. Finally, a detailed assessment of actions taken by US Government departments and agencies in the seven areas laid out in the USG policy, reveals poor overall implementation of policy, which if not corrected, will leave the US militarily, politically, environmentally, and economically vulnerable in the Arctic. Text Arctic Ike Skelton Combined Arms Research Library (CARL) Digital Library Arctic
institution Open Polar
collection Ike Skelton Combined Arms Research Library (CARL) Digital Library
op_collection_id ftcarl
language unknown
topic Arctic regions
National security
Environmental issues
Economics
United States Government
National interest -- United States
spellingShingle Arctic regions
National security
Environmental issues
Economics
United States Government
National interest -- United States
Jordan, Teri L.
Implementation of U.S. policy in the Arctic.
topic_facet Arctic regions
National security
Environmental issues
Economics
United States Government
National interest -- United States
description A tremendous change in the Arctic climate is causing far-reaching impacts on every nation and on the Earth as a whole. The recent changes in the Arctic create numerous areas of interest for the United States, largely driven by national security and economic goals. Given the multiple US interests in the Arctic, in January 2009, President George W. Bush published a national Arctic strategy: National Security Presidential Directive 66 - Homeland Security Presidential Directive 25 (NSPD 66/HSPD 25). Thereafter, numerous departments and agencies developed their supporting Arctic strategies and conducted studies, assessments, and research. However, the United States has failed to put forth the effort and funding necessary to implement its national strategy as laid out by NSPD 66/HSPD 25. An examination of the national policy, along with the various department and agency policies, exposes the intricacies and shallowness of the different assorted Arctic policies. Finally, a detailed assessment of actions taken by US Government departments and agencies in the seven areas laid out in the USG policy, reveals poor overall implementation of policy, which if not corrected, will leave the US militarily, politically, environmentally, and economically vulnerable in the Arctic.
format Text
author Jordan, Teri L.
author_facet Jordan, Teri L.
author_sort Jordan, Teri L.
title Implementation of U.S. policy in the Arctic.
title_short Implementation of U.S. policy in the Arctic.
title_full Implementation of U.S. policy in the Arctic.
title_fullStr Implementation of U.S. policy in the Arctic.
title_full_unstemmed Implementation of U.S. policy in the Arctic.
title_sort implementation of u.s. policy in the arctic.
publisher Fort Leavenworth, KS : US Army Command and General Staff College
publishDate 2013
url http://cgsc.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/p4013coll3/id/3021
op_coverage School of Advanced Military Studies Monographs
geographic Arctic
geographic_facet Arctic
genre Arctic
genre_facet Arctic
op_relation Command and General Staff College (CGSC), School of Advanced Military Studies (SAMS) Monograph
Combined Arms Research Library
Combined Arms Research Library Digital Library
http://cgsc.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/p4013coll3/id/3021
op_rights Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. The opinions and conclusions expressed herein are those of the student-authors and do not necessarily represent the views of the U.S. Army Command and General Staff College or any other governmental agency. (References to these studies should include the foregoing statement.)
_version_ 1801371548151447552