Culturally safe eHealth:what is ‘best practice’ and who determines it?

Background/Objective: Evidence for the relevance, effectiveness, and sociocultural benefits of eHealth interventions with First Nations peoples is growing. In Australia, a research program is preparing a best practice framework (BPF) for eHealth with Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people [1]....

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Population Medicine
Main Authors: Chelberg, Georgina, Mahoney, Ray, Musuwadi, Charankarthi, Butten, Kaley
Format: Conference Object
Language:English
Published: 2023
Subjects:
Online Access:https://researchprofiles.canberra.edu.au/en/publications/fc1d331c-2823-440e-94ef-20eac54bf8c2
https://doi.org/10.18332/popmed/165165
https://researchsystem.canberra.edu.au/ws/files/93772359/Abstract_Book_Rome_2023_metadata.pdf
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85187656853&partnerID=8YFLogxK
id ftcanberrauncris:oai:pure.atira.dk:publications/fc1d331c-2823-440e-94ef-20eac54bf8c2
record_format openpolar
spelling ftcanberrauncris:oai:pure.atira.dk:publications/fc1d331c-2823-440e-94ef-20eac54bf8c2 2024-09-30T14:35:09+00:00 Culturally safe eHealth:what is ‘best practice’ and who determines it? Chelberg, Georgina Mahoney, Ray Musuwadi, Charankarthi Butten, Kaley 2023 application/pdf https://researchprofiles.canberra.edu.au/en/publications/fc1d331c-2823-440e-94ef-20eac54bf8c2 https://doi.org/10.18332/popmed/165165 https://researchsystem.canberra.edu.au/ws/files/93772359/Abstract_Book_Rome_2023_metadata.pdf http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85187656853&partnerID=8YFLogxK eng eng info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess Chelberg , G , Mahoney , R , Musuwadi , C & Butten , K 2023 , ' Culturally safe eHealth : what is ‘best practice’ and who determines it? ' , 17th World congress on public health , Rome , Italy , 2/05/23 - 6/05/25 pp. 1-1 . https://doi.org/10.18332/popmed/165165 conferenceObject 2023 ftcanberrauncris https://doi.org/10.18332/popmed/165165 2024-09-11T23:37:08Z Background/Objective: Evidence for the relevance, effectiveness, and sociocultural benefits of eHealth interventions with First Nations peoples is growing. In Australia, a research program is preparing a best practice framework (BPF) for eHealth with Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people [1]. The 7 phases aim to establish the themes and characteristics of culturally safe eHealth, as voiced by Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people. Methods: A systematic literature review and scoping review were conducted (Phases 1 and (ii) what guidelines or best practice evidence should inform eHealth interventions with Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people. PROSPERO and Open Science Framework protocols were registered. Search strategies incorporated variations of ‘eHealth’; ‘Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander health’; ‘guidelines, ethics’. Database searches included WebofScience, Scopus, Cochrane, Embase, CINAHL, PubMed, PsycINFO, plus grey literature. Screening, data extraction and quality assessments were conducted by 3 authors, with narrative analysis to generate themes (Phase 3). Modified Delphi processes will confirm final themes and principles of the BPF (Phases 4-6). Delphi participants will include stakeholders of eHealth feasibility trials, subject matter experts, and community-controlled partners with expertise in Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander health. Results: The BPF scientific protocol was published in June 2022 [1]. Phases 1&2 commenced November 2022 with findings on-track for release in early 2023. In December 2022, qualitative data collection was completed for several eHealth feasibility trials with Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander communities. Key findings from stakeholders will contribute to subsequent Delphi processes scheduled for May 2023. Dissemination of the foundational BPF is expected December 2023 (Phase 7). This presentation will highlight key findings from completed research phases. Conclusions: A BPF will contribute to rigorous eHealth innovations that promote ... Conference Object First Nations University of Canberra Research Portal Population Medicine 5 Supplement
institution Open Polar
collection University of Canberra Research Portal
op_collection_id ftcanberrauncris
language English
description Background/Objective: Evidence for the relevance, effectiveness, and sociocultural benefits of eHealth interventions with First Nations peoples is growing. In Australia, a research program is preparing a best practice framework (BPF) for eHealth with Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people [1]. The 7 phases aim to establish the themes and characteristics of culturally safe eHealth, as voiced by Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people. Methods: A systematic literature review and scoping review were conducted (Phases 1 and (ii) what guidelines or best practice evidence should inform eHealth interventions with Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people. PROSPERO and Open Science Framework protocols were registered. Search strategies incorporated variations of ‘eHealth’; ‘Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander health’; ‘guidelines, ethics’. Database searches included WebofScience, Scopus, Cochrane, Embase, CINAHL, PubMed, PsycINFO, plus grey literature. Screening, data extraction and quality assessments were conducted by 3 authors, with narrative analysis to generate themes (Phase 3). Modified Delphi processes will confirm final themes and principles of the BPF (Phases 4-6). Delphi participants will include stakeholders of eHealth feasibility trials, subject matter experts, and community-controlled partners with expertise in Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander health. Results: The BPF scientific protocol was published in June 2022 [1]. Phases 1&2 commenced November 2022 with findings on-track for release in early 2023. In December 2022, qualitative data collection was completed for several eHealth feasibility trials with Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander communities. Key findings from stakeholders will contribute to subsequent Delphi processes scheduled for May 2023. Dissemination of the foundational BPF is expected December 2023 (Phase 7). This presentation will highlight key findings from completed research phases. Conclusions: A BPF will contribute to rigorous eHealth innovations that promote ...
format Conference Object
author Chelberg, Georgina
Mahoney, Ray
Musuwadi, Charankarthi
Butten, Kaley
spellingShingle Chelberg, Georgina
Mahoney, Ray
Musuwadi, Charankarthi
Butten, Kaley
Culturally safe eHealth:what is ‘best practice’ and who determines it?
author_facet Chelberg, Georgina
Mahoney, Ray
Musuwadi, Charankarthi
Butten, Kaley
author_sort Chelberg, Georgina
title Culturally safe eHealth:what is ‘best practice’ and who determines it?
title_short Culturally safe eHealth:what is ‘best practice’ and who determines it?
title_full Culturally safe eHealth:what is ‘best practice’ and who determines it?
title_fullStr Culturally safe eHealth:what is ‘best practice’ and who determines it?
title_full_unstemmed Culturally safe eHealth:what is ‘best practice’ and who determines it?
title_sort culturally safe ehealth:what is ‘best practice’ and who determines it?
publishDate 2023
url https://researchprofiles.canberra.edu.au/en/publications/fc1d331c-2823-440e-94ef-20eac54bf8c2
https://doi.org/10.18332/popmed/165165
https://researchsystem.canberra.edu.au/ws/files/93772359/Abstract_Book_Rome_2023_metadata.pdf
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85187656853&partnerID=8YFLogxK
genre First Nations
genre_facet First Nations
op_source Chelberg , G , Mahoney , R , Musuwadi , C & Butten , K 2023 , ' Culturally safe eHealth : what is ‘best practice’ and who determines it? ' , 17th World congress on public health , Rome , Italy , 2/05/23 - 6/05/25 pp. 1-1 . https://doi.org/10.18332/popmed/165165
op_rights info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
op_doi https://doi.org/10.18332/popmed/165165
container_title Population Medicine
container_volume 5
container_issue Supplement
_version_ 1811638506773020672