Evaluating the risk of pathogen transmission from wild animals to domestic pigs in Australia

Wild animals contribute to endemic infection in livestock as well as the introduction, reintroduction and maintenance of pathogens. The source of introduction of endemic diseases to a piggery is often unknown and the extent of wildlife contribution to such local spread is largely unexplored. The aim...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Preventive Veterinary Medicine
Main Authors: Pearson, Hayley, Toribio, Jenny-Ann, Lapidge, Steven, Hernandez-Jover, Marta
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: 2016
Subjects:
Online Access:https://researchprofiles.canberra.edu.au/en/publications/e91d08c9-f56b-4343-abde-a772817c6c5c
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prevetmed.2015.11.017
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84958759768&partnerID=8YFLogxK
id ftcanberrauncris:oai:pure.atira.dk:publications/e91d08c9-f56b-4343-abde-a772817c6c5c
record_format openpolar
spelling ftcanberrauncris:oai:pure.atira.dk:publications/e91d08c9-f56b-4343-abde-a772817c6c5c 2023-05-15T18:05:32+02:00 Evaluating the risk of pathogen transmission from wild animals to domestic pigs in Australia Pearson, Hayley Toribio, Jenny-Ann Lapidge, Steven Hernandez-Jover, Marta 2016-01-01 https://researchprofiles.canberra.edu.au/en/publications/e91d08c9-f56b-4343-abde-a772817c6c5c https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prevetmed.2015.11.017 http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84958759768&partnerID=8YFLogxK eng eng info:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess Pearson , H , Toribio , J-A , Lapidge , S & Hernandez-Jover , M 2016 , ' Evaluating the risk of pathogen transmission from wild animals to domestic pigs in Australia ' , Preventive Veterinary Medicine , vol. 123 , pp. 39-51 . https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prevetmed.2015.11.017 article 2016 ftcanberrauncris https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prevetmed.2015.11.017 2022-10-31T06:45:01Z Wild animals contribute to endemic infection in livestock as well as the introduction, reintroduction and maintenance of pathogens. The source of introduction of endemic diseases to a piggery is often unknown and the extent of wildlife contribution to such local spread is largely unexplored. The aim of the current study was to quantitatively assess the probability of domestic pigs being exposed to different pathogens from wild animals commonly found around commercial piggeries in Australia. Specifically, this study aims to quantify the probability of exposure to the pathogens Escherichia coli, Salmonella spp. and Campylobacter spp. from European starlings (Sturnus vulgarus); Brachyspira hyodysenteriae, Lawsonia intracellularis and Salmonella spp. from rats (Rattus rattus and Rattus norvegicus); and Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae, Leptospira spp., Brucella suis and L. intracellularis from feral pigs (Sus scrofa). Exposure assessments, using scenario trees and Monte Carlo stochastic simulation modelling, were conducted to identify potential pathways of introduction and calculate the probabilities of these pathways occurring. Input parameters were estimated from a national postal survey of commercial pork producers and from disease detection studies conducted for European starlings, rats and feral pigs in close proximity to commercial piggeries in Australia.Based on the results of the exposure assessments, rats presented the highest probability of exposure of pathogens to domestic pigs at any point in time, and L. intracellularis (median 0.13, 5% and 95%, 0.05-0.23) and B. hyodysenteriae (median 0.10, 0.05-0.19) were the most likely pathogens to be transmitted. Regarding European starlings, the median probability of exposure of domestic pigs to pathogenic E. coli at any point in time was estimated to be 0.03 (0.02-0.04). The highest probability of domestic pig exposure to feral pig pathogens at any point in time was found to be for M. hyopneumoniae (median 0.013, 0.007-0.022) and L. intracellularis (median 0.006, ... Article in Journal/Newspaper Rattus rattus University of Canberra Research Portal Preventive Veterinary Medicine 123 39 51
institution Open Polar
collection University of Canberra Research Portal
op_collection_id ftcanberrauncris
language English
description Wild animals contribute to endemic infection in livestock as well as the introduction, reintroduction and maintenance of pathogens. The source of introduction of endemic diseases to a piggery is often unknown and the extent of wildlife contribution to such local spread is largely unexplored. The aim of the current study was to quantitatively assess the probability of domestic pigs being exposed to different pathogens from wild animals commonly found around commercial piggeries in Australia. Specifically, this study aims to quantify the probability of exposure to the pathogens Escherichia coli, Salmonella spp. and Campylobacter spp. from European starlings (Sturnus vulgarus); Brachyspira hyodysenteriae, Lawsonia intracellularis and Salmonella spp. from rats (Rattus rattus and Rattus norvegicus); and Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae, Leptospira spp., Brucella suis and L. intracellularis from feral pigs (Sus scrofa). Exposure assessments, using scenario trees and Monte Carlo stochastic simulation modelling, were conducted to identify potential pathways of introduction and calculate the probabilities of these pathways occurring. Input parameters were estimated from a national postal survey of commercial pork producers and from disease detection studies conducted for European starlings, rats and feral pigs in close proximity to commercial piggeries in Australia.Based on the results of the exposure assessments, rats presented the highest probability of exposure of pathogens to domestic pigs at any point in time, and L. intracellularis (median 0.13, 5% and 95%, 0.05-0.23) and B. hyodysenteriae (median 0.10, 0.05-0.19) were the most likely pathogens to be transmitted. Regarding European starlings, the median probability of exposure of domestic pigs to pathogenic E. coli at any point in time was estimated to be 0.03 (0.02-0.04). The highest probability of domestic pig exposure to feral pig pathogens at any point in time was found to be for M. hyopneumoniae (median 0.013, 0.007-0.022) and L. intracellularis (median 0.006, ...
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Pearson, Hayley
Toribio, Jenny-Ann
Lapidge, Steven
Hernandez-Jover, Marta
spellingShingle Pearson, Hayley
Toribio, Jenny-Ann
Lapidge, Steven
Hernandez-Jover, Marta
Evaluating the risk of pathogen transmission from wild animals to domestic pigs in Australia
author_facet Pearson, Hayley
Toribio, Jenny-Ann
Lapidge, Steven
Hernandez-Jover, Marta
author_sort Pearson, Hayley
title Evaluating the risk of pathogen transmission from wild animals to domestic pigs in Australia
title_short Evaluating the risk of pathogen transmission from wild animals to domestic pigs in Australia
title_full Evaluating the risk of pathogen transmission from wild animals to domestic pigs in Australia
title_fullStr Evaluating the risk of pathogen transmission from wild animals to domestic pigs in Australia
title_full_unstemmed Evaluating the risk of pathogen transmission from wild animals to domestic pigs in Australia
title_sort evaluating the risk of pathogen transmission from wild animals to domestic pigs in australia
publishDate 2016
url https://researchprofiles.canberra.edu.au/en/publications/e91d08c9-f56b-4343-abde-a772817c6c5c
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prevetmed.2015.11.017
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84958759768&partnerID=8YFLogxK
genre Rattus rattus
genre_facet Rattus rattus
op_source Pearson , H , Toribio , J-A , Lapidge , S & Hernandez-Jover , M 2016 , ' Evaluating the risk of pathogen transmission from wild animals to domestic pigs in Australia ' , Preventive Veterinary Medicine , vol. 123 , pp. 39-51 . https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prevetmed.2015.11.017
op_rights info:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prevetmed.2015.11.017
container_title Preventive Veterinary Medicine
container_volume 123
container_start_page 39
op_container_end_page 51
_version_ 1766177015120003072