Geoengineering as a design problem

Understanding the climate impacts of solar geoengineering is essential for evaluating its benefits and risks. Most previous simulations have prescribed a particular strategy and evaluated its modeled effects. Here we turn this approach around by first choosing example climate objectives and then des...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Earth System Dynamics
Main Authors: Kravitz, Ben, MacMartin, Douglas G., Wang, Hailong, Rasch, Philip J.
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:unknown
Published: European Geosciences Union 2016
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-7-469-2016
id ftcaltechauth:oai:authors.library.caltech.edu:md0zr-97q47
record_format openpolar
spelling ftcaltechauth:oai:authors.library.caltech.edu:md0zr-97q47 2024-09-09T19:27:19+00:00 Geoengineering as a design problem Kravitz, Ben MacMartin, Douglas G. Wang, Hailong Rasch, Philip J. 2016-05-24 https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-7-469-2016 unknown European Geosciences Union https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-7-469-2016 oai:authors.library.caltech.edu:md0zr-97q47 eprintid:69449 resolverid:CaltechAUTHORS:20160804-132109803 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess Other Earth System Dynamics, 7(2), 469-497, (2016-05-24) info:eu-repo/semantics/article 2016 ftcaltechauth https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-7-469-2016 2024-08-06T15:35:00Z Understanding the climate impacts of solar geoengineering is essential for evaluating its benefits and risks. Most previous simulations have prescribed a particular strategy and evaluated its modeled effects. Here we turn this approach around by first choosing example climate objectives and then designing a strategy to meet those objectives in climate models. There are four essential criteria for designing a strategy: (i) an explicit specification of the objectives, (ii) defining what climate forcing agents to modify so the objectives are met, (iii) a method for managing uncertainties, and (iv) independent verification of the strategy in an evaluation model. We demonstrate this design perspective through two multi-objective examples. First, changes in Arctic temperature and the position of tropical precipitation due to CO_2 increases are offset by adjusting high-latitude insolation in each hemisphere independently. Second, three different latitude-dependent patterns of insolation are modified to offset CO_2-induced changes in global mean temperature, interhemispheric temperature asymmetry, and the Equator-to-pole temperature gradient. In both examples, the "design" and "evaluation" models are state-of-the-art fully coupled atmosphere–ocean general circulation models. © 2016 Author(s). This work is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License. Received: 06 Aug 2015 – Published in Earth Syst. Dynam. Discuss.: 08 Sep 2015; Revised: 18 Mar 2016 – Accepted: 10 May 2016 – Published: 24 May 2016. We thank the reviewers and the editor for thorough comments that greatly improved the manuscript. The Pacific Northwest National Laboratory is operated for the US Department of Energy by Battelle Memorial Institute under contract DE-AC05-76RL01830. CESM simulations were performed using PNNL institutional computing resources. GISS ModelE2 simulations were supported by the NASA High-End Computing (HEC) Program through the NASA Center for Climate Simulation (NCCS) at Goddard Space Flight Center. ... Article in Journal/Newspaper Arctic Caltech Authors (California Institute of Technology) Arctic Pacific Earth System Dynamics 7 2 469 497
institution Open Polar
collection Caltech Authors (California Institute of Technology)
op_collection_id ftcaltechauth
language unknown
description Understanding the climate impacts of solar geoengineering is essential for evaluating its benefits and risks. Most previous simulations have prescribed a particular strategy and evaluated its modeled effects. Here we turn this approach around by first choosing example climate objectives and then designing a strategy to meet those objectives in climate models. There are four essential criteria for designing a strategy: (i) an explicit specification of the objectives, (ii) defining what climate forcing agents to modify so the objectives are met, (iii) a method for managing uncertainties, and (iv) independent verification of the strategy in an evaluation model. We demonstrate this design perspective through two multi-objective examples. First, changes in Arctic temperature and the position of tropical precipitation due to CO_2 increases are offset by adjusting high-latitude insolation in each hemisphere independently. Second, three different latitude-dependent patterns of insolation are modified to offset CO_2-induced changes in global mean temperature, interhemispheric temperature asymmetry, and the Equator-to-pole temperature gradient. In both examples, the "design" and "evaluation" models are state-of-the-art fully coupled atmosphere–ocean general circulation models. © 2016 Author(s). This work is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License. Received: 06 Aug 2015 – Published in Earth Syst. Dynam. Discuss.: 08 Sep 2015; Revised: 18 Mar 2016 – Accepted: 10 May 2016 – Published: 24 May 2016. We thank the reviewers and the editor for thorough comments that greatly improved the manuscript. The Pacific Northwest National Laboratory is operated for the US Department of Energy by Battelle Memorial Institute under contract DE-AC05-76RL01830. CESM simulations were performed using PNNL institutional computing resources. GISS ModelE2 simulations were supported by the NASA High-End Computing (HEC) Program through the NASA Center for Climate Simulation (NCCS) at Goddard Space Flight Center. ...
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Kravitz, Ben
MacMartin, Douglas G.
Wang, Hailong
Rasch, Philip J.
spellingShingle Kravitz, Ben
MacMartin, Douglas G.
Wang, Hailong
Rasch, Philip J.
Geoengineering as a design problem
author_facet Kravitz, Ben
MacMartin, Douglas G.
Wang, Hailong
Rasch, Philip J.
author_sort Kravitz, Ben
title Geoengineering as a design problem
title_short Geoengineering as a design problem
title_full Geoengineering as a design problem
title_fullStr Geoengineering as a design problem
title_full_unstemmed Geoengineering as a design problem
title_sort geoengineering as a design problem
publisher European Geosciences Union
publishDate 2016
url https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-7-469-2016
geographic Arctic
Pacific
geographic_facet Arctic
Pacific
genre Arctic
genre_facet Arctic
op_source Earth System Dynamics, 7(2), 469-497, (2016-05-24)
op_relation https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-7-469-2016
oai:authors.library.caltech.edu:md0zr-97q47
eprintid:69449
resolverid:CaltechAUTHORS:20160804-132109803
op_rights info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
Other
op_doi https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-7-469-2016
container_title Earth System Dynamics
container_volume 7
container_issue 2
container_start_page 469
op_container_end_page 497
_version_ 1809896771050012672