Some geometrical aspects of uncertainties in combined plate reconstructions

The uncertainties in both the position of a pole of rotation and the rotation angle describing a plate reconstruction depend not only on the number and quality of data used but also on two geometrical factors: the length of plate boundary represented by the data, and the distance from the best-fit p...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Stock, Joann M., Molnar, Peter
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:unknown
Published: Geological Society of America 1983
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1130/0091-7613(1983)11<697:SGAOUI>2.0.CO;2
id ftcaltechauth:oai:authors.library.caltech.edu:h5f7j-61323
record_format openpolar
spelling ftcaltechauth:oai:authors.library.caltech.edu:h5f7j-61323 2024-09-15T18:23:40+00:00 Some geometrical aspects of uncertainties in combined plate reconstructions Stock, Joann M. Molnar, Peter 1983-12 https://doi.org/10.1130/0091-7613(1983)11<697:SGAOUI>2.0.CO;2 unknown Geological Society of America https://doi.org/10.1130/0091-7613(1983)11<697:SGAOUI>2.0.CO;2 oai:authors.library.caltech.edu:h5f7j-61323 eprintid:49325 resolverid:CaltechAUTHORS:20140908-095209670 info:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess Other Geology, 11(12), 697-701, (1983-12) info:eu-repo/semantics/article 1983 ftcaltechauth https://doi.org/10.1130/0091-7613(1983)11<697:SGAOUI>2.0.CO;2 2024-08-06T15:35:00Z The uncertainties in both the position of a pole of rotation and the rotation angle describing a plate reconstruction depend not only on the number and quality of data used but also on two geometrical factors: the length of plate boundary represented by the data, and the distance from the best-fit pole to the center of the data region. We describe a simple geometrical method that can be used to calculate minimum uncertainties in reconstructions, based on positions of magnetic anomalies and fracture zones with finite uncertainties. Uncertainties in pole positions and angles corresponding to 10-km uncertainty in individual data points can, when combined, yield uncertainties in reconstructed positions greatly in excess of 10 km per rotation. For example, an uncertainty of 10 km in anomaly 6 reconstructions in the South Pacific, southeast Indian, northwest Indian, and North Atlantic Oceans would result in uncertainty of up to 190 km in the reconstructed position of the Pacific plate with respect to North America at 19.8 m.y. B.P. Existing data show that the realistic uncertainties for this case are twice as large as the calculated minimum uncertainties. © 1983 Geological Society of America. Manuscript received May 17, 1983; Revised manuscript received August 16, 1983; Manuscript accepted August 17, 1983. Supported in part by National Science Foundation Grant EAR-77-13673. We thank T. Atwater for helpful criticism. Article in Journal/Newspaper North Atlantic Caltech Authors (California Institute of Technology)
institution Open Polar
collection Caltech Authors (California Institute of Technology)
op_collection_id ftcaltechauth
language unknown
description The uncertainties in both the position of a pole of rotation and the rotation angle describing a plate reconstruction depend not only on the number and quality of data used but also on two geometrical factors: the length of plate boundary represented by the data, and the distance from the best-fit pole to the center of the data region. We describe a simple geometrical method that can be used to calculate minimum uncertainties in reconstructions, based on positions of magnetic anomalies and fracture zones with finite uncertainties. Uncertainties in pole positions and angles corresponding to 10-km uncertainty in individual data points can, when combined, yield uncertainties in reconstructed positions greatly in excess of 10 km per rotation. For example, an uncertainty of 10 km in anomaly 6 reconstructions in the South Pacific, southeast Indian, northwest Indian, and North Atlantic Oceans would result in uncertainty of up to 190 km in the reconstructed position of the Pacific plate with respect to North America at 19.8 m.y. B.P. Existing data show that the realistic uncertainties for this case are twice as large as the calculated minimum uncertainties. © 1983 Geological Society of America. Manuscript received May 17, 1983; Revised manuscript received August 16, 1983; Manuscript accepted August 17, 1983. Supported in part by National Science Foundation Grant EAR-77-13673. We thank T. Atwater for helpful criticism.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Stock, Joann M.
Molnar, Peter
spellingShingle Stock, Joann M.
Molnar, Peter
Some geometrical aspects of uncertainties in combined plate reconstructions
author_facet Stock, Joann M.
Molnar, Peter
author_sort Stock, Joann M.
title Some geometrical aspects of uncertainties in combined plate reconstructions
title_short Some geometrical aspects of uncertainties in combined plate reconstructions
title_full Some geometrical aspects of uncertainties in combined plate reconstructions
title_fullStr Some geometrical aspects of uncertainties in combined plate reconstructions
title_full_unstemmed Some geometrical aspects of uncertainties in combined plate reconstructions
title_sort some geometrical aspects of uncertainties in combined plate reconstructions
publisher Geological Society of America
publishDate 1983
url https://doi.org/10.1130/0091-7613(1983)11<697:SGAOUI>2.0.CO;2
genre North Atlantic
genre_facet North Atlantic
op_source Geology, 11(12), 697-701, (1983-12)
op_relation https://doi.org/10.1130/0091-7613(1983)11<697:SGAOUI>2.0.CO;2
oai:authors.library.caltech.edu:h5f7j-61323
eprintid:49325
resolverid:CaltechAUTHORS:20140908-095209670
op_rights info:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess
Other
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1130/0091-7613(1983)11<697:SGAOUI>2.0.CO;2
_version_ 1810463923564969984