A Measurement of the Cosmic Microwave Background Lensing Potential and Power Spectrum from 500 deg² of SPTpol Temperature and Polarization Data

We present a measurement of the cosmic microwave background lensing potential using 500 deg² of 150 GHz data from the SPTpol receiver on the South Pole Telescope. The lensing potential is reconstructed with signal-to-noise per mode greater than unity at lensing multipoles L ≾ 250, using a quadratic...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:The Astrophysical Journal
Main Authors: Wu, W. L. K., Moran, C. Corbett, Crites, A. T., Padin, S.
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: American Astronomical Society 2019
Subjects:
Online Access:https://authors.library.caltech.edu/99251/
https://authors.library.caltech.edu/99251/1/Wu_2019_ApJ_884_70.pdf
https://authors.library.caltech.edu/99251/2/1905.05777.pdf
https://resolver.caltech.edu/CaltechAUTHORS:20191014-111719097
Description
Summary:We present a measurement of the cosmic microwave background lensing potential using 500 deg² of 150 GHz data from the SPTpol receiver on the South Pole Telescope. The lensing potential is reconstructed with signal-to-noise per mode greater than unity at lensing multipoles L ≾ 250, using a quadratic estimator on a combination of cosmic microwave background temperature and polarization maps. We report measurements of the lensing potential power spectrum in the multipole range of 100 < L < 2000 from sets of temperature-only (T), polarization-only (POL), and minimum-variance (MV) estimators. We measure the lensing amplitude by taking the ratio of the measured spectrum to the expected spectrum from the best-fit Λ cold dark matter model to the Planck 2015 TT + low P + lensing data set. For the minimum-variance estimator, we find A_(MV) = 0.944±0.058(Stat.)±0.025(Sys.) restricting to only polarization data, we find A_(POL) = 0.906±0.090(Stat.)±0.040(Sys.). Considering statistical uncertainties alone, this is the most precise polarization-only lensing amplitude constraint to date (10.1σ) and is more precise than our temperature-only constraint. We perform null tests and consistency checks and find no evidence for significant contamination.