Global isostatic geoid anomalies for plate and boundary layer models of the lithosphere

Isostatic geoid anomalies are usually interpreted using a flat-earth, one-dimensional idealization. Isostatic anomalies on the spherical, self-gravitating earth differ from this idealization because: (1) degree one terms in the spherical harmonic expansion vanish; (2) each term in the spherical harm...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Earth and Planetary Science Letters
Main Author: Hager, Bradford H.
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:unknown
Published: Elsevier 1983
Subjects:
Online Access:https://authors.library.caltech.edu/84529/
https://resolver.caltech.edu/CaltechAUTHORS:20180125-135055796
id ftcaltechauth:oai:authors.library.caltech.edu:84529
record_format openpolar
spelling ftcaltechauth:oai:authors.library.caltech.edu:84529 2023-05-15T14:01:44+02:00 Global isostatic geoid anomalies for plate and boundary layer models of the lithosphere Hager, Bradford H. 1983-04 https://authors.library.caltech.edu/84529/ https://resolver.caltech.edu/CaltechAUTHORS:20180125-135055796 unknown Elsevier Hager, Bradford H. (1983) Global isostatic geoid anomalies for plate and boundary layer models of the lithosphere. Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 63 (1). pp. 97-109. ISSN 0012-821X. doi:10.1016/0012-821X(83)90025-0. https://resolver.caltech.edu/CaltechAUTHORS:20180125-135055796 <https://resolver.caltech.edu/CaltechAUTHORS:20180125-135055796> Article PeerReviewed 1983 ftcaltechauth https://doi.org/10.1016/0012-821X(83)90025-0 2021-11-18T18:44:53Z Isostatic geoid anomalies are usually interpreted using a flat-earth, one-dimensional idealization. Isostatic anomalies on the spherical, self-gravitating earth differ from this idealization because: (1) degree one terms in the spherical harmonic expansion vanish; (2) each term in the spherical harmonic expansion is multiplied by (l + 2)/(l + 0.5) relative to the flat-earth case; (3) mass in cones rather than straight-sided columns is constant; and (4) further deformation of the earth is induced by the gravitational attraction of the deformation caused by the isostatic potential anomaly. When the effect of each of these is quantified, the second, third, and fourth nearly cancel, leaving the degree one, “over the horizon” effect providing the most important difference. Calculations of model isostatic geoid anomalies for the spherical analogues (developed here) of the plate and boundary layer thermal models show that this effect can bias estimates of geoid slopes by over 20%, although the effect is usually less than 5%. The geoid anomalies for these two models are quite different over old ocean basins, but they are unlikely to be distinguishable on the basis of global geoid observations owing to the presence of other larger perturbations in the geoid. Stripping the effects of plate aging and a hypothetical uniform, 35 km thick, isostatically-compensated continental crust from the observed geoid emphasizes that the largest-amplitude geoid anomaly is the geoid low of almost 120 m over West Antarctica. This anomaly is a factor of two greater in amplitude than the low of 60 m over Sri Lanka. Article in Journal/Newspaper Antarc* Antarctica West Antarctica Caltech Authors (California Institute of Technology) West Antarctica Earth and Planetary Science Letters 63 1 97 109
institution Open Polar
collection Caltech Authors (California Institute of Technology)
op_collection_id ftcaltechauth
language unknown
description Isostatic geoid anomalies are usually interpreted using a flat-earth, one-dimensional idealization. Isostatic anomalies on the spherical, self-gravitating earth differ from this idealization because: (1) degree one terms in the spherical harmonic expansion vanish; (2) each term in the spherical harmonic expansion is multiplied by (l + 2)/(l + 0.5) relative to the flat-earth case; (3) mass in cones rather than straight-sided columns is constant; and (4) further deformation of the earth is induced by the gravitational attraction of the deformation caused by the isostatic potential anomaly. When the effect of each of these is quantified, the second, third, and fourth nearly cancel, leaving the degree one, “over the horizon” effect providing the most important difference. Calculations of model isostatic geoid anomalies for the spherical analogues (developed here) of the plate and boundary layer thermal models show that this effect can bias estimates of geoid slopes by over 20%, although the effect is usually less than 5%. The geoid anomalies for these two models are quite different over old ocean basins, but they are unlikely to be distinguishable on the basis of global geoid observations owing to the presence of other larger perturbations in the geoid. Stripping the effects of plate aging and a hypothetical uniform, 35 km thick, isostatically-compensated continental crust from the observed geoid emphasizes that the largest-amplitude geoid anomaly is the geoid low of almost 120 m over West Antarctica. This anomaly is a factor of two greater in amplitude than the low of 60 m over Sri Lanka.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Hager, Bradford H.
spellingShingle Hager, Bradford H.
Global isostatic geoid anomalies for plate and boundary layer models of the lithosphere
author_facet Hager, Bradford H.
author_sort Hager, Bradford H.
title Global isostatic geoid anomalies for plate and boundary layer models of the lithosphere
title_short Global isostatic geoid anomalies for plate and boundary layer models of the lithosphere
title_full Global isostatic geoid anomalies for plate and boundary layer models of the lithosphere
title_fullStr Global isostatic geoid anomalies for plate and boundary layer models of the lithosphere
title_full_unstemmed Global isostatic geoid anomalies for plate and boundary layer models of the lithosphere
title_sort global isostatic geoid anomalies for plate and boundary layer models of the lithosphere
publisher Elsevier
publishDate 1983
url https://authors.library.caltech.edu/84529/
https://resolver.caltech.edu/CaltechAUTHORS:20180125-135055796
geographic West Antarctica
geographic_facet West Antarctica
genre Antarc*
Antarctica
West Antarctica
genre_facet Antarc*
Antarctica
West Antarctica
op_relation Hager, Bradford H. (1983) Global isostatic geoid anomalies for plate and boundary layer models of the lithosphere. Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 63 (1). pp. 97-109. ISSN 0012-821X. doi:10.1016/0012-821X(83)90025-0. https://resolver.caltech.edu/CaltechAUTHORS:20180125-135055796 <https://resolver.caltech.edu/CaltechAUTHORS:20180125-135055796>
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1016/0012-821X(83)90025-0
container_title Earth and Planetary Science Letters
container_volume 63
container_issue 1
container_start_page 97
op_container_end_page 109
_version_ 1766271775272861696