Seismic evidence that the source of the Iceland hotspot lies at the core-mantle boundary

Although Morgan proposed in 1971 that hotspots such as Iceland were the result of hot, rising mantle plumes, it is still debated whether plumes originate from a thermal boundary just above the core-mantle boundary or at the base of the upper mantle. Although seismic evidence of plumes in the upper m...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Nature
Main Authors: Helmberger, D. V., Wen, L., Ding, X.
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:unknown
Published: Nature Publishing Group 1998
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1038/24357
id ftcaltechauth:oai:authors.library.caltech.edu:742zv-cjz87
record_format openpolar
spelling ftcaltechauth:oai:authors.library.caltech.edu:742zv-cjz87 2024-10-20T14:09:36+00:00 Seismic evidence that the source of the Iceland hotspot lies at the core-mantle boundary Helmberger, D. V. Wen, L. Ding, X. 1998-11-19 https://doi.org/10.1038/24357 unknown Nature Publishing Group https://doi.org/10.1038/24357 eprintid:37717 info:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess Other Nature, 396(6708), 251-255, (1998-11-19) info:eu-repo/semantics/article 1998 ftcaltechauth https://doi.org/10.1038/24357 2024-09-25T18:46:36Z Although Morgan proposed in 1971 that hotspots such as Iceland were the result of hot, rising mantle plumes, it is still debated whether plumes originate from a thermal boundary just above the core-mantle boundary or at the base of the upper mantle. Although seismic evidence of plumes in the upper mantle is accumulating, narrow plume conduits in the deep mantle have yet to be detected. Details of plume formation in the lower mantle have therefore remained largely unconstrained. Here, however, we present seismic evidence for the presence of a localized patch of material with ultra-low seismic wave speed, located at the core-mantle boundary beneath the Iceland hotspot, and propose that this zone represents the hot, partially molten source region of the Iceland mantle plume. Through the modelling of seismic waveforms, we constrain the seismic velocity structure at this patch of the core-mantle boundary using a numerical-analytical interfacing code5 designed to reproduce the complex interference of shear-wave phases transmitted through, and refracted at, the boundary. Although this structure is difficult to constrain precisely, our preferred model consists of a dome which is 250 km wide, 40 km high and contains P- and S-wave velocity (wave-speed) reductions of 10% and 30%, respectively. © 1998 Macmillan Publishers Ltd. Received 4 September 1997; accepted 10 September 1998. We thank J. Ritsema for comments on early drafts. This work was supported by the NSF. Article in Journal/Newspaper Iceland Caltech Authors (California Institute of Technology) Nature 396 6708 251 255
institution Open Polar
collection Caltech Authors (California Institute of Technology)
op_collection_id ftcaltechauth
language unknown
description Although Morgan proposed in 1971 that hotspots such as Iceland were the result of hot, rising mantle plumes, it is still debated whether plumes originate from a thermal boundary just above the core-mantle boundary or at the base of the upper mantle. Although seismic evidence of plumes in the upper mantle is accumulating, narrow plume conduits in the deep mantle have yet to be detected. Details of plume formation in the lower mantle have therefore remained largely unconstrained. Here, however, we present seismic evidence for the presence of a localized patch of material with ultra-low seismic wave speed, located at the core-mantle boundary beneath the Iceland hotspot, and propose that this zone represents the hot, partially molten source region of the Iceland mantle plume. Through the modelling of seismic waveforms, we constrain the seismic velocity structure at this patch of the core-mantle boundary using a numerical-analytical interfacing code5 designed to reproduce the complex interference of shear-wave phases transmitted through, and refracted at, the boundary. Although this structure is difficult to constrain precisely, our preferred model consists of a dome which is 250 km wide, 40 km high and contains P- and S-wave velocity (wave-speed) reductions of 10% and 30%, respectively. © 1998 Macmillan Publishers Ltd. Received 4 September 1997; accepted 10 September 1998. We thank J. Ritsema for comments on early drafts. This work was supported by the NSF.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Helmberger, D. V.
Wen, L.
Ding, X.
spellingShingle Helmberger, D. V.
Wen, L.
Ding, X.
Seismic evidence that the source of the Iceland hotspot lies at the core-mantle boundary
author_facet Helmberger, D. V.
Wen, L.
Ding, X.
author_sort Helmberger, D. V.
title Seismic evidence that the source of the Iceland hotspot lies at the core-mantle boundary
title_short Seismic evidence that the source of the Iceland hotspot lies at the core-mantle boundary
title_full Seismic evidence that the source of the Iceland hotspot lies at the core-mantle boundary
title_fullStr Seismic evidence that the source of the Iceland hotspot lies at the core-mantle boundary
title_full_unstemmed Seismic evidence that the source of the Iceland hotspot lies at the core-mantle boundary
title_sort seismic evidence that the source of the iceland hotspot lies at the core-mantle boundary
publisher Nature Publishing Group
publishDate 1998
url https://doi.org/10.1038/24357
genre Iceland
genre_facet Iceland
op_source Nature, 396(6708), 251-255, (1998-11-19)
op_relation https://doi.org/10.1038/24357
eprintid:37717
op_rights info:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess
Other
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1038/24357
container_title Nature
container_volume 396
container_issue 6708
container_start_page 251
op_container_end_page 255
_version_ 1813449192020901888