The Canadian Human Footprint

Abstract: Efforts are underway in Canada to set aside terrestrial lands for conservation, thereby protecting them from anthropogenic pressures. Here we produce the first Canadian human footprint map by combining twelve different anthropogenic pressures and identify intact and modified lands and ecos...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Hirsh-Pearson, Kristen, Johnson, Chris, Schuster, Richard, Wheate, Roger, Venter, Oscar
Format: Other/Unknown Material
Language:English
Published: Borealis 2020
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.5683/SP2/EVKAVL
id ftborealisdata:doi:10.5683/SP2/EVKAVL
record_format openpolar
spelling ftborealisdata:doi:10.5683/SP2/EVKAVL 2023-05-15T15:07:38+02:00 The Canadian Human Footprint Hirsh-Pearson, Kristen Johnson, Chris Schuster, Richard Wheate, Roger Venter, Oscar Hirsh-Pearson, Kristen 2020-02-20 https://doi.org/10.5683/SP2/EVKAVL English eng Borealis https://doi.org/10.5683/SP2/EVKAVL Earth and Environmental Sciences Anthropogenic Disturbance Human Footprint Cumulative Effects Pressure Mapping Multiple Pressures Threats Biodiversity Conservation Spatial Data Raster Data 2020 ftborealisdata https://doi.org/10.5683/SP2/EVKAVL 2022-10-10T05:30:29Z Abstract: Efforts are underway in Canada to set aside terrestrial lands for conservation, thereby protecting them from anthropogenic pressures. Here we produce the first Canadian human footprint map by combining twelve different anthropogenic pressures and identify intact and modified lands and ecosystems across the country. Our results showed strong spatial variation in pressures across the country, with just 18% of Canada experiencing measurable human pressure. However, some ecosystems are experiencing very high pressure, such as the Great Lakes Plains and Prairies national ecological areas which have over 75% and 56% of their areas, respectively, with a high human footprint. In contrast, the Arctic and Northern Mountains have less than 0.02% and 0.2% of their extent under high human footprint. A validation of the final map, using random statistical sampling, resulted in a Cohen Kappa statistic of 0.91, signifying an ‘almost perfect’ agreement between the human footprint and the validation data set. By increasing the number and accuracy of mapped pressures, our map demonstrates much more widespread pressures in Canada than were indicated by previous global mapping efforts, demonstrating the value in specific national data applications. Ecological areas with immense anthropogenic pressure, highlight challenges that may arise when planning for ecologically representative protected areas. Other/Unknown Material Arctic Borealis Arctic Canada
institution Open Polar
collection Borealis
op_collection_id ftborealisdata
language English
topic Earth and Environmental Sciences
Anthropogenic Disturbance
Human Footprint
Cumulative Effects
Pressure Mapping
Multiple Pressures
Threats
Biodiversity Conservation
spellingShingle Earth and Environmental Sciences
Anthropogenic Disturbance
Human Footprint
Cumulative Effects
Pressure Mapping
Multiple Pressures
Threats
Biodiversity Conservation
Hirsh-Pearson, Kristen
Johnson, Chris
Schuster, Richard
Wheate, Roger
Venter, Oscar
The Canadian Human Footprint
topic_facet Earth and Environmental Sciences
Anthropogenic Disturbance
Human Footprint
Cumulative Effects
Pressure Mapping
Multiple Pressures
Threats
Biodiversity Conservation
description Abstract: Efforts are underway in Canada to set aside terrestrial lands for conservation, thereby protecting them from anthropogenic pressures. Here we produce the first Canadian human footprint map by combining twelve different anthropogenic pressures and identify intact and modified lands and ecosystems across the country. Our results showed strong spatial variation in pressures across the country, with just 18% of Canada experiencing measurable human pressure. However, some ecosystems are experiencing very high pressure, such as the Great Lakes Plains and Prairies national ecological areas which have over 75% and 56% of their areas, respectively, with a high human footprint. In contrast, the Arctic and Northern Mountains have less than 0.02% and 0.2% of their extent under high human footprint. A validation of the final map, using random statistical sampling, resulted in a Cohen Kappa statistic of 0.91, signifying an ‘almost perfect’ agreement between the human footprint and the validation data set. By increasing the number and accuracy of mapped pressures, our map demonstrates much more widespread pressures in Canada than were indicated by previous global mapping efforts, demonstrating the value in specific national data applications. Ecological areas with immense anthropogenic pressure, highlight challenges that may arise when planning for ecologically representative protected areas.
author2 Hirsh-Pearson, Kristen
format Other/Unknown Material
author Hirsh-Pearson, Kristen
Johnson, Chris
Schuster, Richard
Wheate, Roger
Venter, Oscar
author_facet Hirsh-Pearson, Kristen
Johnson, Chris
Schuster, Richard
Wheate, Roger
Venter, Oscar
author_sort Hirsh-Pearson, Kristen
title The Canadian Human Footprint
title_short The Canadian Human Footprint
title_full The Canadian Human Footprint
title_fullStr The Canadian Human Footprint
title_full_unstemmed The Canadian Human Footprint
title_sort canadian human footprint
publisher Borealis
publishDate 2020
url https://doi.org/10.5683/SP2/EVKAVL
geographic Arctic
Canada
geographic_facet Arctic
Canada
genre Arctic
genre_facet Arctic
op_relation https://doi.org/10.5683/SP2/EVKAVL
op_doi https://doi.org/10.5683/SP2/EVKAVL
_version_ 1766339093435777024