Human-Wildlife Conflict

Conflicts between people and wildlife can result in monetary loss, agricultural damage or even injury and mortality of a person or the wildlife. Reducing these conflicts is difficult due to differences of opinion regarding the importance of wildlife and the appropriateness of the strategies we use t...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Wall, Benjamin, Williamson, Matt, Breedlove, Sarah, Murenbeeld, Katie, Potter, Laura
Format: Text
Language:unknown
Published: ScholarWorks 2023
Subjects:
Online Access:https://scholarworks.boisestate.edu/under_showcase_2023/90
id ftboisestateu:oai:scholarworks.boisestate.edu:under_showcase_2023-1089
record_format openpolar
spelling ftboisestateu:oai:scholarworks.boisestate.edu:under_showcase_2023-1089 2023-10-29T02:40:45+01:00 Human-Wildlife Conflict Wall, Benjamin Williamson, Matt Breedlove, Sarah Murenbeeld, Katie Potter, Laura 2023-04-21T07:00:00Z https://scholarworks.boisestate.edu/under_showcase_2023/90 unknown ScholarWorks https://scholarworks.boisestate.edu/under_showcase_2023/90 2023 Undergraduate Research Showcase text 2023 ftboisestateu 2023-09-29T15:24:30Z Conflicts between people and wildlife can result in monetary loss, agricultural damage or even injury and mortality of a person or the wildlife. Reducing these conflicts is difficult due to differences of opinion regarding the importance of wildlife and the appropriateness of the strategies we use to manage them. Understanding common themes that underlie conflict could lead to better management practices for agencies and civilians alike and highlight shared perceptions of the benefits that wildlife can bring. We are hoping to identify the range of conflicts and better understand public opinions by combining machine learning and article coding to look at thousands of articles. Using the NewsBank database, we found over 150 different articles from around the country that describe interactions between humans and wildlife and performed content analysis in order to categorize the themes within the articles. We focused on a select group of species, consisting of grizzly bears (Ursus arctos), wild boars (Sus scrofa), and beavers (Genus castor). Through the reading and content analysis we were able to build a codebook consisting of 20 different coding themes. Preliminary results show a clear indication that the discourse around human-wildlife interactions tends to be negative, regardless of species type. Although this is especially true within the species of Boars and Grizzly Bears, we also found that Beavers have a little more of a positive sentiment analysis. The type of negative outcome can vary drastically, depending on species and interaction type, but the fact remains that in general, humans and wildlife struggle to cohabitate peacefully. Further research will include; 20 continual coding of articles, possible expansion of the codebook, the inclusion of more species residing in North America in order to determine different conflicts and outcomes, and using the coded article corpus to build and train a supervised classification algorithm. The benefits of our approach can create safer environments for wildlife and ... Text Ursus arctos Boise State University: Scholar Works
institution Open Polar
collection Boise State University: Scholar Works
op_collection_id ftboisestateu
language unknown
description Conflicts between people and wildlife can result in monetary loss, agricultural damage or even injury and mortality of a person or the wildlife. Reducing these conflicts is difficult due to differences of opinion regarding the importance of wildlife and the appropriateness of the strategies we use to manage them. Understanding common themes that underlie conflict could lead to better management practices for agencies and civilians alike and highlight shared perceptions of the benefits that wildlife can bring. We are hoping to identify the range of conflicts and better understand public opinions by combining machine learning and article coding to look at thousands of articles. Using the NewsBank database, we found over 150 different articles from around the country that describe interactions between humans and wildlife and performed content analysis in order to categorize the themes within the articles. We focused on a select group of species, consisting of grizzly bears (Ursus arctos), wild boars (Sus scrofa), and beavers (Genus castor). Through the reading and content analysis we were able to build a codebook consisting of 20 different coding themes. Preliminary results show a clear indication that the discourse around human-wildlife interactions tends to be negative, regardless of species type. Although this is especially true within the species of Boars and Grizzly Bears, we also found that Beavers have a little more of a positive sentiment analysis. The type of negative outcome can vary drastically, depending on species and interaction type, but the fact remains that in general, humans and wildlife struggle to cohabitate peacefully. Further research will include; 20 continual coding of articles, possible expansion of the codebook, the inclusion of more species residing in North America in order to determine different conflicts and outcomes, and using the coded article corpus to build and train a supervised classification algorithm. The benefits of our approach can create safer environments for wildlife and ...
format Text
author Wall, Benjamin
Williamson, Matt
Breedlove, Sarah
Murenbeeld, Katie
Potter, Laura
spellingShingle Wall, Benjamin
Williamson, Matt
Breedlove, Sarah
Murenbeeld, Katie
Potter, Laura
Human-Wildlife Conflict
author_facet Wall, Benjamin
Williamson, Matt
Breedlove, Sarah
Murenbeeld, Katie
Potter, Laura
author_sort Wall, Benjamin
title Human-Wildlife Conflict
title_short Human-Wildlife Conflict
title_full Human-Wildlife Conflict
title_fullStr Human-Wildlife Conflict
title_full_unstemmed Human-Wildlife Conflict
title_sort human-wildlife conflict
publisher ScholarWorks
publishDate 2023
url https://scholarworks.boisestate.edu/under_showcase_2023/90
genre Ursus arctos
genre_facet Ursus arctos
op_source 2023 Undergraduate Research Showcase
op_relation https://scholarworks.boisestate.edu/under_showcase_2023/90
_version_ 1781069395139756032