Nestling Immunocompetence is Affected by Captivity but Not Investigator Handling

Environmental conditions during the neonatal period can affect the growth, physiology, behavior, and immune function of birds. In many avian studies the nestling environment includes investigator handling of young, which may be stressful. While neonatal handling is known to affect the adult phenotyp...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Butler, Michael W., Dufty, Alfred M., Jr.
Format: Text
Language:unknown
Published: ScholarWorks 2007
Subjects:
Online Access:https://scholarworks.boisestate.edu/bio_facpubs/313
https://doi.org/10.1650/0010-5422(2007)109[920:NIIABC]2.0.CO;2
id ftboisestateu:oai:scholarworks.boisestate.edu:bio_facpubs-1312
record_format openpolar
spelling ftboisestateu:oai:scholarworks.boisestate.edu:bio_facpubs-1312 2023-10-29T02:35:09+01:00 Nestling Immunocompetence is Affected by Captivity but Not Investigator Handling Butler, Michael W. Dufty, Alfred M., Jr. 2007-11-01T07:00:00Z https://scholarworks.boisestate.edu/bio_facpubs/313 https://doi.org/10.1650/0010-5422(2007)109[920:NIIABC]2.0.CO;2 unknown ScholarWorks https://scholarworks.boisestate.edu/bio_facpubs/313 doi:10.1650/0010-5422(2007)109[920:NIIABC]2.0.CO;2 http://dx.doi.org/10.1650/0010-5422(2007)109[920:NIIABC]2.0.CO;2 Biology Faculty Publications and Presentations captivity development handling immunocompetence nestling phytohemagglutinin stress Biology text 2007 ftboisestateu https://doi.org/10.1650/0010-5422(2007)109[920:NIIABC]2.0.CO;2 2023-09-29T15:10:24Z Environmental conditions during the neonatal period can affect the growth, physiology, behavior, and immune function of birds. In many avian studies the nestling environment includes investigator handling of young, which may be stressful. While neonatal handling is known to affect the adult phenotype in rats, the effects of handling on development have rarely been examined in wild birds. We examined the effect of short, repeated periods of neonatal handling on avian growth and immune system development. We subjected American Kestrels (Falco sparverius) and European Starlings (Sturnus vulgaris) to 15 min of daily investigator handling throughout the nestling period, while controls remained undisturbed. Immediately prior to fledging we assessed cutaneous immunity, humoral immunity, mass, and degree of fluctuating asymmetry. Daily handling did not significantly affect any of these measurements. We also addressed the possibility that treatment differences would appear only when birds were challenged with a more substantial stressor by bringing birds into captivity for 24 hr. Captivity did not affect mass, but significantly lowered the cutaneous immune response, although this was independent of treatment. Therefore, brief periods of investigator handling did not appear to affect immune or morphological development in these species, whereas 24 hr of captivity resulted in suppressed cutaneous immune responses. Text Avian Studies Boise State University: Scholar Works
institution Open Polar
collection Boise State University: Scholar Works
op_collection_id ftboisestateu
language unknown
topic captivity
development
handling
immunocompetence
nestling
phytohemagglutinin
stress
Biology
spellingShingle captivity
development
handling
immunocompetence
nestling
phytohemagglutinin
stress
Biology
Butler, Michael W.
Dufty, Alfred M., Jr.
Nestling Immunocompetence is Affected by Captivity but Not Investigator Handling
topic_facet captivity
development
handling
immunocompetence
nestling
phytohemagglutinin
stress
Biology
description Environmental conditions during the neonatal period can affect the growth, physiology, behavior, and immune function of birds. In many avian studies the nestling environment includes investigator handling of young, which may be stressful. While neonatal handling is known to affect the adult phenotype in rats, the effects of handling on development have rarely been examined in wild birds. We examined the effect of short, repeated periods of neonatal handling on avian growth and immune system development. We subjected American Kestrels (Falco sparverius) and European Starlings (Sturnus vulgaris) to 15 min of daily investigator handling throughout the nestling period, while controls remained undisturbed. Immediately prior to fledging we assessed cutaneous immunity, humoral immunity, mass, and degree of fluctuating asymmetry. Daily handling did not significantly affect any of these measurements. We also addressed the possibility that treatment differences would appear only when birds were challenged with a more substantial stressor by bringing birds into captivity for 24 hr. Captivity did not affect mass, but significantly lowered the cutaneous immune response, although this was independent of treatment. Therefore, brief periods of investigator handling did not appear to affect immune or morphological development in these species, whereas 24 hr of captivity resulted in suppressed cutaneous immune responses.
format Text
author Butler, Michael W.
Dufty, Alfred M., Jr.
author_facet Butler, Michael W.
Dufty, Alfred M., Jr.
author_sort Butler, Michael W.
title Nestling Immunocompetence is Affected by Captivity but Not Investigator Handling
title_short Nestling Immunocompetence is Affected by Captivity but Not Investigator Handling
title_full Nestling Immunocompetence is Affected by Captivity but Not Investigator Handling
title_fullStr Nestling Immunocompetence is Affected by Captivity but Not Investigator Handling
title_full_unstemmed Nestling Immunocompetence is Affected by Captivity but Not Investigator Handling
title_sort nestling immunocompetence is affected by captivity but not investigator handling
publisher ScholarWorks
publishDate 2007
url https://scholarworks.boisestate.edu/bio_facpubs/313
https://doi.org/10.1650/0010-5422(2007)109[920:NIIABC]2.0.CO;2
genre Avian Studies
genre_facet Avian Studies
op_source Biology Faculty Publications and Presentations
op_relation https://scholarworks.boisestate.edu/bio_facpubs/313
doi:10.1650/0010-5422(2007)109[920:NIIABC]2.0.CO;2
http://dx.doi.org/10.1650/0010-5422(2007)109[920:NIIABC]2.0.CO;2
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1650/0010-5422(2007)109[920:NIIABC]2.0.CO;2
_version_ 1781058173974609920