Proximity to Established Populations Explains Moose (Alces alces) Occurrence in Northern Wisconsin

Wildlife conservation and management requires an understanding of patterns and changes in the populations and distributions of wildlife. Moose (Alces alces) population trends vary within regions of North America, such as in the upper Midwest region of the United States where sub-populations are decl...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Lucas O. Olson, Timothy R. Van Deelen, John D. J. Clare, Maximilian L. Allen
Format: Text
Language:English
Published: University of Notre Dame 2020
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1637/19-023
id ftbioone:10.1637/19-023
record_format openpolar
spelling ftbioone:10.1637/19-023 2023-07-30T03:55:46+02:00 Proximity to Established Populations Explains Moose (Alces alces) Occurrence in Northern Wisconsin Lucas O. Olson Timothy R. Van Deelen John D. J. Clare Maximilian L. Allen Lucas O. Olson Timothy R. Van Deelen John D. J. Clare Maximilian L. Allen world 2020-01-21 text/HTML https://doi.org/10.1637/19-023 en eng University of Notre Dame doi:10.1637/19-023 All rights reserved. https://doi.org/10.1637/19-023 Text 2020 ftbioone https://doi.org/10.1637/19-023 2023-07-09T10:37:00Z Wildlife conservation and management requires an understanding of patterns and changes in the populations and distributions of wildlife. Moose (Alces alces) population trends vary within regions of North America, such as in the upper Midwest region of the United States where sub-populations are declining in Minnesota, but are stable or increasing in Michigan. The population and distribution of moose in Wisconsin, which shares a border with Minnesota and Michigan, is unknown. We examined community scientist observations of moose collected by the Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources from 1991–2017 to determine the trends of moose occurrence in Wisconsin and the relationship to potential drivers. We used a binomial generalized linear mixed model in a Bayesian framework to understand how variables affect county-level occurrence of moose. We found moose occurrence was greater in counties closer to Minnesota and Michigan, but the effect of distance to Minnesota on moose occurrence has decreased over time. We also found counties with higher habitat suitability and proximity to Michigan are more likely to have a moose occurrence than those with low habitat suitability. This study offers insight for moose populations at the southern fringe of their circumpolar distribution and a foundation for understanding the moose population in Wisconsin and the upper Midwest. Text Alces alces BioOne Online Journals
institution Open Polar
collection BioOne Online Journals
op_collection_id ftbioone
language English
description Wildlife conservation and management requires an understanding of patterns and changes in the populations and distributions of wildlife. Moose (Alces alces) population trends vary within regions of North America, such as in the upper Midwest region of the United States where sub-populations are declining in Minnesota, but are stable or increasing in Michigan. The population and distribution of moose in Wisconsin, which shares a border with Minnesota and Michigan, is unknown. We examined community scientist observations of moose collected by the Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources from 1991–2017 to determine the trends of moose occurrence in Wisconsin and the relationship to potential drivers. We used a binomial generalized linear mixed model in a Bayesian framework to understand how variables affect county-level occurrence of moose. We found moose occurrence was greater in counties closer to Minnesota and Michigan, but the effect of distance to Minnesota on moose occurrence has decreased over time. We also found counties with higher habitat suitability and proximity to Michigan are more likely to have a moose occurrence than those with low habitat suitability. This study offers insight for moose populations at the southern fringe of their circumpolar distribution and a foundation for understanding the moose population in Wisconsin and the upper Midwest.
author2 Lucas O. Olson
Timothy R. Van Deelen
John D. J. Clare
Maximilian L. Allen
format Text
author Lucas O. Olson
Timothy R. Van Deelen
John D. J. Clare
Maximilian L. Allen
spellingShingle Lucas O. Olson
Timothy R. Van Deelen
John D. J. Clare
Maximilian L. Allen
Proximity to Established Populations Explains Moose (Alces alces) Occurrence in Northern Wisconsin
author_facet Lucas O. Olson
Timothy R. Van Deelen
John D. J. Clare
Maximilian L. Allen
author_sort Lucas O. Olson
title Proximity to Established Populations Explains Moose (Alces alces) Occurrence in Northern Wisconsin
title_short Proximity to Established Populations Explains Moose (Alces alces) Occurrence in Northern Wisconsin
title_full Proximity to Established Populations Explains Moose (Alces alces) Occurrence in Northern Wisconsin
title_fullStr Proximity to Established Populations Explains Moose (Alces alces) Occurrence in Northern Wisconsin
title_full_unstemmed Proximity to Established Populations Explains Moose (Alces alces) Occurrence in Northern Wisconsin
title_sort proximity to established populations explains moose (alces alces) occurrence in northern wisconsin
publisher University of Notre Dame
publishDate 2020
url https://doi.org/10.1637/19-023
op_coverage world
genre Alces alces
genre_facet Alces alces
op_source https://doi.org/10.1637/19-023
op_relation doi:10.1637/19-023
op_rights All rights reserved.
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1637/19-023
_version_ 1772821478801145856