Bird—Habitat Relationships in Interior Columbia Basin Shrubsteppe

Vegetation structure is important in structuring avian communities. In the sagebrush biome, where continued habitat loss is thought to threaten shrusteppe-obligate birds, both remotely sensed and field-acquired measures of big sagebrush (Artemisia tridentata) cover have proven valuable in understand...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:The Condor
Main Authors: Susan L. Earnst, Aaron L. Holmes
Format: Text
Language:English
Published: American Ornithological Society 2012
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1525/cond.2012.100176
id ftbioone:10.1525/cond.2012.100176
record_format openpolar
spelling ftbioone:10.1525/cond.2012.100176 2023-07-30T04:03:18+02:00 Bird—Habitat Relationships in Interior Columbia Basin Shrubsteppe Susan L. Earnst Aaron L. Holmes Susan L. Earnst Aaron L. Holmes world 2012-02-01 text/HTML https://doi.org/10.1525/cond.2012.100176 en eng American Ornithological Society doi:10.1525/cond.2012.100176 All rights reserved. https://doi.org/10.1525/cond.2012.100176 Text 2012 ftbioone https://doi.org/10.1525/cond.2012.100176 2023-07-09T09:23:43Z Vegetation structure is important in structuring avian communities. In the sagebrush biome, where continued habitat loss is thought to threaten shrusteppe-obligate birds, both remotely sensed and field-acquired measures of big sagebrush (Artemisia tridentata) cover have proven valuable in understanding avian abundance. Differences in structure between the exotic annual cheatgrass (Bromus tectorum) and native bunchgrasses are also expected to be important. We used abundance from 318 point-count locations, coupled with field vegetation measurements and a detailed vegetation map, to model abundance of four shrub- and four grassland-associated avian species in southeastern Washington. Specifically, we ask whether species' abundances in bunchgrass and cheatgrass differ and whether mapped categories of cover adequately explain species' abundances or whether finegrained, field-measured differences in vegetation are also important in explaining abundance. We found that the abundance of shrub associates did not differ in sagebrush with a cheatgrass vs. bunchgrass understory, but grassland associates tended to use bunchgrass more than cheatgrass grasslands (Horned Lark, Eremophila alpestris; Grasshopper Sparrow, Ammodramus savannarum), or, in one case, cheatgrass more than bunchgrass (Long-billed Curlew, Numenius americanus). In the comparison of map- and field-based models, mapped cover types alone were sufficient for predicting abundance of five species studied, but models containing field-measured sagebrush cover outperformed models based on maps only for three species, the Sage Sparrow (Amphispiza belli) ( ), Horned Lark (-), and Grasshopper Sparrow (-). We conclude that cover-type maps that consider understory composition and sagebrush density can predict avian distribution and abundance in the sagebrush biome efficiently. Text Eremophila alpestris BioOne Online Journals The Condor 114 1 15 29
institution Open Polar
collection BioOne Online Journals
op_collection_id ftbioone
language English
description Vegetation structure is important in structuring avian communities. In the sagebrush biome, where continued habitat loss is thought to threaten shrusteppe-obligate birds, both remotely sensed and field-acquired measures of big sagebrush (Artemisia tridentata) cover have proven valuable in understanding avian abundance. Differences in structure between the exotic annual cheatgrass (Bromus tectorum) and native bunchgrasses are also expected to be important. We used abundance from 318 point-count locations, coupled with field vegetation measurements and a detailed vegetation map, to model abundance of four shrub- and four grassland-associated avian species in southeastern Washington. Specifically, we ask whether species' abundances in bunchgrass and cheatgrass differ and whether mapped categories of cover adequately explain species' abundances or whether finegrained, field-measured differences in vegetation are also important in explaining abundance. We found that the abundance of shrub associates did not differ in sagebrush with a cheatgrass vs. bunchgrass understory, but grassland associates tended to use bunchgrass more than cheatgrass grasslands (Horned Lark, Eremophila alpestris; Grasshopper Sparrow, Ammodramus savannarum), or, in one case, cheatgrass more than bunchgrass (Long-billed Curlew, Numenius americanus). In the comparison of map- and field-based models, mapped cover types alone were sufficient for predicting abundance of five species studied, but models containing field-measured sagebrush cover outperformed models based on maps only for three species, the Sage Sparrow (Amphispiza belli) ( ), Horned Lark (-), and Grasshopper Sparrow (-). We conclude that cover-type maps that consider understory composition and sagebrush density can predict avian distribution and abundance in the sagebrush biome efficiently.
author2 Susan L. Earnst
Aaron L. Holmes
format Text
author Susan L. Earnst
Aaron L. Holmes
spellingShingle Susan L. Earnst
Aaron L. Holmes
Bird—Habitat Relationships in Interior Columbia Basin Shrubsteppe
author_facet Susan L. Earnst
Aaron L. Holmes
author_sort Susan L. Earnst
title Bird—Habitat Relationships in Interior Columbia Basin Shrubsteppe
title_short Bird—Habitat Relationships in Interior Columbia Basin Shrubsteppe
title_full Bird—Habitat Relationships in Interior Columbia Basin Shrubsteppe
title_fullStr Bird—Habitat Relationships in Interior Columbia Basin Shrubsteppe
title_full_unstemmed Bird—Habitat Relationships in Interior Columbia Basin Shrubsteppe
title_sort bird—habitat relationships in interior columbia basin shrubsteppe
publisher American Ornithological Society
publishDate 2012
url https://doi.org/10.1525/cond.2012.100176
op_coverage world
genre Eremophila alpestris
genre_facet Eremophila alpestris
op_source https://doi.org/10.1525/cond.2012.100176
op_relation doi:10.1525/cond.2012.100176
op_rights All rights reserved.
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1525/cond.2012.100176
container_title The Condor
container_volume 114
container_issue 1
container_start_page 15
op_container_end_page 29
_version_ 1772814286568030208