Seasonal and Age-Dependent Dietary Partitioning between the Great Black-Backed and Herring Gulls

Studies of seabird diets may reveal subtle ways in which sympatric species partition resources to facilitate co-existence. We studied the variability and partitioning of diets between the Herring (Larus argentatus) and Great Black-backed Gulls (L. marinus), both generalist predators, during incubati...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:The Condor
Main Authors: Rolanda J. Steenweg, Robert A. Ronconi, Marty L. Leonard
Format: Text
Language:English
Published: American Ornithological Society 2011
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1525/cond.2011.110004
id ftbioone:10.1525/cond.2011.110004
record_format openpolar
spelling ftbioone:10.1525/cond.2011.110004 2023-07-30T04:04:49+02:00 Seasonal and Age-Dependent Dietary Partitioning between the Great Black-Backed and Herring Gulls Rolanda J. Steenweg Robert A. Ronconi Marty L. Leonard Rolanda J. Steenweg Robert A. Ronconi Marty L. Leonard world 2011-11-01 text/HTML https://doi.org/10.1525/cond.2011.110004 en eng American Ornithological Society doi:10.1525/cond.2011.110004 All rights reserved. https://doi.org/10.1525/cond.2011.110004 Text 2011 ftbioone https://doi.org/10.1525/cond.2011.110004 2023-07-09T09:23:43Z Studies of seabird diets may reveal subtle ways in which sympatric species partition resources to facilitate co-existence. We studied the variability and partitioning of diets between the Herring (Larus argentatus) and Great Black-backed Gulls (L. marinus), both generalist predators, during incubation and early chick rearing on Kent Island, Bay of Fundy, Canada. We assessed diets from pellets collected around nests, regurgitates from captured birds, and stable-isotope analysis of prey items and tissues (blood and feathers) obtained from chicks and adults. Pellet analyses indicated that both species relied primarily on fish (28 to 45% of identified prey items) and crabs (15 to 43%). Stable-isotope analyses showed that the Great Black-backed Gull fed at a higher trophic level than the Herring Gull, both species fed at higher trophic levels during breeding than during nonbreeding, and both species has similar preferences for feeding inshore vs. offshore and in terrestrial vs. marine habitats. Contrary to previous research, we found that chicks were fed from a lower trophic level than where adults feed. Models of isotopic mixing estimating the proportion of assimilated diets were generally consistent with the pellet analysis for adults but revealed that both species fed their chicks more krill (>60%; Meganyctiphanes norvegica) and mackerel (>20%; Scomber scombrus) than adults consumed; adults may selectively provision their young with easily digestible prey and prey of high energy content. Our results reveal evidence of dietary partitioning between species and age classes, and highlight the strengths and biases associated with techniques for sampling gulls' diet. Text Meganyctiphanes norvegica BioOne Online Journals Canada Island Bay ENVELOPE(-109.085,-109.085,59.534,59.534) Kent Island ENVELOPE(70.133,70.133,-49.033,-49.033) The Condor 113 4 795 805
institution Open Polar
collection BioOne Online Journals
op_collection_id ftbioone
language English
description Studies of seabird diets may reveal subtle ways in which sympatric species partition resources to facilitate co-existence. We studied the variability and partitioning of diets between the Herring (Larus argentatus) and Great Black-backed Gulls (L. marinus), both generalist predators, during incubation and early chick rearing on Kent Island, Bay of Fundy, Canada. We assessed diets from pellets collected around nests, regurgitates from captured birds, and stable-isotope analysis of prey items and tissues (blood and feathers) obtained from chicks and adults. Pellet analyses indicated that both species relied primarily on fish (28 to 45% of identified prey items) and crabs (15 to 43%). Stable-isotope analyses showed that the Great Black-backed Gull fed at a higher trophic level than the Herring Gull, both species fed at higher trophic levels during breeding than during nonbreeding, and both species has similar preferences for feeding inshore vs. offshore and in terrestrial vs. marine habitats. Contrary to previous research, we found that chicks were fed from a lower trophic level than where adults feed. Models of isotopic mixing estimating the proportion of assimilated diets were generally consistent with the pellet analysis for adults but revealed that both species fed their chicks more krill (>60%; Meganyctiphanes norvegica) and mackerel (>20%; Scomber scombrus) than adults consumed; adults may selectively provision their young with easily digestible prey and prey of high energy content. Our results reveal evidence of dietary partitioning between species and age classes, and highlight the strengths and biases associated with techniques for sampling gulls' diet.
author2 Rolanda J. Steenweg
Robert A. Ronconi
Marty L. Leonard
format Text
author Rolanda J. Steenweg
Robert A. Ronconi
Marty L. Leonard
spellingShingle Rolanda J. Steenweg
Robert A. Ronconi
Marty L. Leonard
Seasonal and Age-Dependent Dietary Partitioning between the Great Black-Backed and Herring Gulls
author_facet Rolanda J. Steenweg
Robert A. Ronconi
Marty L. Leonard
author_sort Rolanda J. Steenweg
title Seasonal and Age-Dependent Dietary Partitioning between the Great Black-Backed and Herring Gulls
title_short Seasonal and Age-Dependent Dietary Partitioning between the Great Black-Backed and Herring Gulls
title_full Seasonal and Age-Dependent Dietary Partitioning between the Great Black-Backed and Herring Gulls
title_fullStr Seasonal and Age-Dependent Dietary Partitioning between the Great Black-Backed and Herring Gulls
title_full_unstemmed Seasonal and Age-Dependent Dietary Partitioning between the Great Black-Backed and Herring Gulls
title_sort seasonal and age-dependent dietary partitioning between the great black-backed and herring gulls
publisher American Ornithological Society
publishDate 2011
url https://doi.org/10.1525/cond.2011.110004
op_coverage world
long_lat ENVELOPE(-109.085,-109.085,59.534,59.534)
ENVELOPE(70.133,70.133,-49.033,-49.033)
geographic Canada
Island Bay
Kent Island
geographic_facet Canada
Island Bay
Kent Island
genre Meganyctiphanes norvegica
genre_facet Meganyctiphanes norvegica
op_source https://doi.org/10.1525/cond.2011.110004
op_relation doi:10.1525/cond.2011.110004
op_rights All rights reserved.
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1525/cond.2011.110004
container_title The Condor
container_volume 113
container_issue 4
container_start_page 795
op_container_end_page 805
_version_ 1772816422699794432