Eggshell Spotting does not Predict Male Incubation but Marks Thinner Areas of a Shorebird's Shells

Many birds lay eggs speckled with black or reddish-brown spots of protoporphyrin pigment, but the function of these spots is debated. Two recent hypotheses have received considerable attention. Under the “signaling-function hypothesis,” speckling reflects female quality and influences allocation of...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:The Auk
Main Authors: Martin Bulla, Miroslav Šálek, Andrew G. Gosler
Format: Text
Language:English
Published: American Ornithological Society 2012
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1525/auk.2012.11090
id ftbioone:10.1525/auk.2012.11090
record_format openpolar
spelling ftbioone:10.1525/auk.2012.11090 2024-05-12T08:12:16+00:00 Eggshell Spotting does not Predict Male Incubation but Marks Thinner Areas of a Shorebird's Shells Martin Bulla Miroslav Šálek Andrew G. Gosler Martin Bulla Miroslav Šálek Andrew G. Gosler world 2012-01-01 text/HTML https://doi.org/10.1525/auk.2012.11090 en eng American Ornithological Society doi:10.1525/auk.2012.11090 All rights reserved. https://doi.org/10.1525/auk.2012.11090 Text 2012 ftbioone https://doi.org/10.1525/auk.2012.11090 2024-04-16T02:13:36Z Many birds lay eggs speckled with black or reddish-brown spots of protoporphyrin pigment, but the function of these spots is debated. Two recent hypotheses have received considerable attention. Under the “signaling-function hypothesis,” speckling reflects female quality and influences allocation of male parental care; under the “structural-function hypothesis,” the speckles strengthen the eggshell when calcium is scarce. The evidence for each is taxonomically uneven. For instance, evidence for the signaling-function hypothesis comes from cavity-nesting and uniparentally incubating species in which the viewing conditions and possibilities for males to assess the speckling are limited, and male response to speckling is indirect (i.e., female-feeding) or postponed (i.e., chickfeeding). We tested the predictions of both hypotheses in a biparentally incubating ground-nesting shorebird, the Northern Lapwing (Vanellus vanellus), in which the potential for a direct male response to eggshell speckling exists and visual inspection of the eggs is not hindered by light availability in a nest cavity. The speckling parameters (spot intensity, distribution, and cover) were repeatable within Northern Lapwing clutches, a requirement for a sexually selected signal, but we found no relationship between male incubation and speckling. However, the spots were associated with thinner areas of eggshell, which strongly supports the suggestion of a structural (strengthening) function. Our results do not support the signaling-function hypothesis of eggshell speckling, but extend the structural-function hypothesis and prior findings (that speckling occurs primarily at thinner areas of the shell) to other avian taxa. Furthermore, if the generally accepted view that Northern Lapwing eggs are cryptically marked is correct, our findings suggest that more than one significant function can drive the evolution of avian eggshell pigmentation. Text Vanellus vanellus BioOne Online Journals The Auk 129 1 26 35
institution Open Polar
collection BioOne Online Journals
op_collection_id ftbioone
language English
description Many birds lay eggs speckled with black or reddish-brown spots of protoporphyrin pigment, but the function of these spots is debated. Two recent hypotheses have received considerable attention. Under the “signaling-function hypothesis,” speckling reflects female quality and influences allocation of male parental care; under the “structural-function hypothesis,” the speckles strengthen the eggshell when calcium is scarce. The evidence for each is taxonomically uneven. For instance, evidence for the signaling-function hypothesis comes from cavity-nesting and uniparentally incubating species in which the viewing conditions and possibilities for males to assess the speckling are limited, and male response to speckling is indirect (i.e., female-feeding) or postponed (i.e., chickfeeding). We tested the predictions of both hypotheses in a biparentally incubating ground-nesting shorebird, the Northern Lapwing (Vanellus vanellus), in which the potential for a direct male response to eggshell speckling exists and visual inspection of the eggs is not hindered by light availability in a nest cavity. The speckling parameters (spot intensity, distribution, and cover) were repeatable within Northern Lapwing clutches, a requirement for a sexually selected signal, but we found no relationship between male incubation and speckling. However, the spots were associated with thinner areas of eggshell, which strongly supports the suggestion of a structural (strengthening) function. Our results do not support the signaling-function hypothesis of eggshell speckling, but extend the structural-function hypothesis and prior findings (that speckling occurs primarily at thinner areas of the shell) to other avian taxa. Furthermore, if the generally accepted view that Northern Lapwing eggs are cryptically marked is correct, our findings suggest that more than one significant function can drive the evolution of avian eggshell pigmentation.
author2 Martin Bulla
Miroslav Šálek
Andrew G. Gosler
format Text
author Martin Bulla
Miroslav Šálek
Andrew G. Gosler
spellingShingle Martin Bulla
Miroslav Šálek
Andrew G. Gosler
Eggshell Spotting does not Predict Male Incubation but Marks Thinner Areas of a Shorebird's Shells
author_facet Martin Bulla
Miroslav Šálek
Andrew G. Gosler
author_sort Martin Bulla
title Eggshell Spotting does not Predict Male Incubation but Marks Thinner Areas of a Shorebird's Shells
title_short Eggshell Spotting does not Predict Male Incubation but Marks Thinner Areas of a Shorebird's Shells
title_full Eggshell Spotting does not Predict Male Incubation but Marks Thinner Areas of a Shorebird's Shells
title_fullStr Eggshell Spotting does not Predict Male Incubation but Marks Thinner Areas of a Shorebird's Shells
title_full_unstemmed Eggshell Spotting does not Predict Male Incubation but Marks Thinner Areas of a Shorebird's Shells
title_sort eggshell spotting does not predict male incubation but marks thinner areas of a shorebird's shells
publisher American Ornithological Society
publishDate 2012
url https://doi.org/10.1525/auk.2012.11090
op_coverage world
genre Vanellus vanellus
genre_facet Vanellus vanellus
op_source https://doi.org/10.1525/auk.2012.11090
op_relation doi:10.1525/auk.2012.11090
op_rights All rights reserved.
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1525/auk.2012.11090
container_title The Auk
container_volume 129
container_issue 1
container_start_page 26
op_container_end_page 35
_version_ 1798834580326711296