French Consumers' Attitudes and Preferences Toward Wild and Farmed Fish

We investigated consumer preferences for wild and farmed fish in an experiment with 276 participants in France. The experiment consisted of three rounds—each round included a survey, sensory trials, and bidding. The survey results indicate consumers (1) perceive wild fish best for safety and health...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Marine Resource Economics
Main Authors: Kyrre Rickertsen, Frode Alfnes
Format: Text
Language:English
Published: MRE Foundation, Inc. 2017
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1086/689202
id ftbioone:10.1086/689202
record_format openpolar
spelling ftbioone:10.1086/689202 2024-06-02T08:11:21+00:00 French Consumers' Attitudes and Preferences Toward Wild and Farmed Fish Kyrre Rickertsen Frode Alfnes Kyrre Rickertsen Frode Alfnes world 2017-10-27 text/HTML https://doi.org/10.1086/689202 en eng MRE Foundation, Inc. doi:10.1086/689202 All rights reserved. https://doi.org/10.1086/689202 Text 2017 ftbioone https://doi.org/10.1086/689202 2024-05-07T00:51:43Z We investigated consumer preferences for wild and farmed fish in an experiment with 276 participants in France. The experiment consisted of three rounds—each round included a survey, sensory trials, and bidding. The survey results indicate consumers (1) perceive wild fish best for safety and health and farmed fish best for environmental sustainability and fish welfare; (2) rank salmon the highest on many attributes; and (3) prefer wild fish originating from the North Atlantic to farmed fish from France and northern Europe, and they rank farmed fish originating from developing countries lowest. In the sensory trials, salmon received the highest hedonic scores, followed by monkfish and cod, while pangasius scored significantly lower. Willingness to pay for salmon was almost as high as for monkfish and higher than for cod, while WTP for pangasius was substantially lower.JEL Codes: C91, D12, Q22. Text North Atlantic BioOne Online Journals Marine Resource Economics 32 1 59 81
institution Open Polar
collection BioOne Online Journals
op_collection_id ftbioone
language English
description We investigated consumer preferences for wild and farmed fish in an experiment with 276 participants in France. The experiment consisted of three rounds—each round included a survey, sensory trials, and bidding. The survey results indicate consumers (1) perceive wild fish best for safety and health and farmed fish best for environmental sustainability and fish welfare; (2) rank salmon the highest on many attributes; and (3) prefer wild fish originating from the North Atlantic to farmed fish from France and northern Europe, and they rank farmed fish originating from developing countries lowest. In the sensory trials, salmon received the highest hedonic scores, followed by monkfish and cod, while pangasius scored significantly lower. Willingness to pay for salmon was almost as high as for monkfish and higher than for cod, while WTP for pangasius was substantially lower.JEL Codes: C91, D12, Q22.
author2 Kyrre Rickertsen
Frode Alfnes
format Text
author Kyrre Rickertsen
Frode Alfnes
spellingShingle Kyrre Rickertsen
Frode Alfnes
French Consumers' Attitudes and Preferences Toward Wild and Farmed Fish
author_facet Kyrre Rickertsen
Frode Alfnes
author_sort Kyrre Rickertsen
title French Consumers' Attitudes and Preferences Toward Wild and Farmed Fish
title_short French Consumers' Attitudes and Preferences Toward Wild and Farmed Fish
title_full French Consumers' Attitudes and Preferences Toward Wild and Farmed Fish
title_fullStr French Consumers' Attitudes and Preferences Toward Wild and Farmed Fish
title_full_unstemmed French Consumers' Attitudes and Preferences Toward Wild and Farmed Fish
title_sort french consumers' attitudes and preferences toward wild and farmed fish
publisher MRE Foundation, Inc.
publishDate 2017
url https://doi.org/10.1086/689202
op_coverage world
genre North Atlantic
genre_facet North Atlantic
op_source https://doi.org/10.1086/689202
op_relation doi:10.1086/689202
op_rights All rights reserved.
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1086/689202
container_title Marine Resource Economics
container_volume 32
container_issue 1
container_start_page 59
op_container_end_page 81
_version_ 1800757458614878208