Bioassessment of Freshwater Ecosystems using the Reference Condition Approach: Comparing Established and New Methods with Common Data Sets

Although used in many jurisdictions around the world, analytical approaches of the Reference Condition Approach (RCA) to bioassessment of freshwater ecosystems have evolved quite slowly over the past 2 decades. For this special series of papers in Freshwater Science, researchers analyzed 3 data sets...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Freshwater Science
Main Authors: Robert C. Bailey, Simon Linke, Adam G. Yates
Format: Text
Language:English
Published: Society for Freshwater Science 2014
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1086/678771
id ftbioone:10.1086/678771
record_format openpolar
spelling ftbioone:10.1086/678771 2024-06-02T08:15:54+00:00 Bioassessment of Freshwater Ecosystems using the Reference Condition Approach: Comparing Established and New Methods with Common Data Sets Robert C. Bailey Simon Linke Adam G. Yates Robert C. Bailey Simon Linke Adam G. Yates world 2014-10-06 text/HTML https://doi.org/10.1086/678771 en eng Society for Freshwater Science doi:10.1086/678771 All rights reserved. https://doi.org/10.1086/678771 Text 2014 ftbioone https://doi.org/10.1086/678771 2024-05-07T00:51:43Z Although used in many jurisdictions around the world, analytical approaches of the Reference Condition Approach (RCA) to bioassessment of freshwater ecosystems have evolved quite slowly over the past 2 decades. For this special series of papers in Freshwater Science, researchers analyzed 3 data sets that included both benthic macroinvertebrate and environmental data from a number of reference sites. Australian Capital Territory (ACT) reference sites (ntotal = 107) were wadeable streams in the upper Murrumbidgee River catchment, Australian Capital Territory, Australia. Yukon Territory (YT) reference sites were wadeable streams (ntotal = 158) in the Yukon Territory, Canada, part of the Yukon River basin. Great Lakes (GL) sites (ntotal = 164) were all nearshore (<20 m) lentic sites in the North American Great Lakes. For each data set, sites were divided into model-building (training) and model-testing (validation) groups. Each validation site was further subjected to 3 levels of simulated degradation based on the sensitivity of the biota to eutrophication. The analytical approaches ranged from standard or slight modifications of methods used in national programs (Australian River Assessment [AUSRIVAS], Canadian Aquatic Biomonitoring Network [CABIN]), to improved matching of sites to be assessed and appropriate reference sites, and Bayesian and machine-learning modeling. In comparing Type 1 error rates (proportion of validation sites deemed not in reference condition) and power (proportion of simulated impairment sites deemed not in reference condition), we found no obvious pattern among the 3 data sets or approaches. Approaches commonly used in RCA programs would benefit from incorporating newer methods that better match reference and test-site environments and build better predictive models. Text Yukon river Yukon BioOne Online Journals Canada Yukon Freshwater Science 33 4 1204 1211
institution Open Polar
collection BioOne Online Journals
op_collection_id ftbioone
language English
description Although used in many jurisdictions around the world, analytical approaches of the Reference Condition Approach (RCA) to bioassessment of freshwater ecosystems have evolved quite slowly over the past 2 decades. For this special series of papers in Freshwater Science, researchers analyzed 3 data sets that included both benthic macroinvertebrate and environmental data from a number of reference sites. Australian Capital Territory (ACT) reference sites (ntotal = 107) were wadeable streams in the upper Murrumbidgee River catchment, Australian Capital Territory, Australia. Yukon Territory (YT) reference sites were wadeable streams (ntotal = 158) in the Yukon Territory, Canada, part of the Yukon River basin. Great Lakes (GL) sites (ntotal = 164) were all nearshore (<20 m) lentic sites in the North American Great Lakes. For each data set, sites were divided into model-building (training) and model-testing (validation) groups. Each validation site was further subjected to 3 levels of simulated degradation based on the sensitivity of the biota to eutrophication. The analytical approaches ranged from standard or slight modifications of methods used in national programs (Australian River Assessment [AUSRIVAS], Canadian Aquatic Biomonitoring Network [CABIN]), to improved matching of sites to be assessed and appropriate reference sites, and Bayesian and machine-learning modeling. In comparing Type 1 error rates (proportion of validation sites deemed not in reference condition) and power (proportion of simulated impairment sites deemed not in reference condition), we found no obvious pattern among the 3 data sets or approaches. Approaches commonly used in RCA programs would benefit from incorporating newer methods that better match reference and test-site environments and build better predictive models.
author2 Robert C. Bailey
Simon Linke
Adam G. Yates
format Text
author Robert C. Bailey
Simon Linke
Adam G. Yates
spellingShingle Robert C. Bailey
Simon Linke
Adam G. Yates
Bioassessment of Freshwater Ecosystems using the Reference Condition Approach: Comparing Established and New Methods with Common Data Sets
author_facet Robert C. Bailey
Simon Linke
Adam G. Yates
author_sort Robert C. Bailey
title Bioassessment of Freshwater Ecosystems using the Reference Condition Approach: Comparing Established and New Methods with Common Data Sets
title_short Bioassessment of Freshwater Ecosystems using the Reference Condition Approach: Comparing Established and New Methods with Common Data Sets
title_full Bioassessment of Freshwater Ecosystems using the Reference Condition Approach: Comparing Established and New Methods with Common Data Sets
title_fullStr Bioassessment of Freshwater Ecosystems using the Reference Condition Approach: Comparing Established and New Methods with Common Data Sets
title_full_unstemmed Bioassessment of Freshwater Ecosystems using the Reference Condition Approach: Comparing Established and New Methods with Common Data Sets
title_sort bioassessment of freshwater ecosystems using the reference condition approach: comparing established and new methods with common data sets
publisher Society for Freshwater Science
publishDate 2014
url https://doi.org/10.1086/678771
op_coverage world
geographic Canada
Yukon
geographic_facet Canada
Yukon
genre Yukon river
Yukon
genre_facet Yukon river
Yukon
op_source https://doi.org/10.1086/678771
op_relation doi:10.1086/678771
op_rights All rights reserved.
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1086/678771
container_title Freshwater Science
container_volume 33
container_issue 4
container_start_page 1204
op_container_end_page 1211
_version_ 1800740212752515072