How to Break a Sperm Whale's Teeth: Dental Damage in a Large Miocene Physeteroid from the North Sea Basin

In contrast to the suction-feeding, predominantly teuthophagous extant sperm whale, several Miocene physeteroids display proportionally larger teeth, deeply embedded in both upper and lower jaws. Together with other osteological features, these differences lead to the functional interpretation of th...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology
Main Authors: Olivier Lambert, Giovanni Bianucci
Format: Text
Language:English
Published: The Society of Vertebrate Paleontology 2019
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1080/02724634.2019.1660987
id ftbioone:10.1080/02724634.2019.1660987
record_format openpolar
spelling ftbioone:10.1080/02724634.2019.1660987 2024-06-02T08:14:54+00:00 How to Break a Sperm Whale's Teeth: Dental Damage in a Large Miocene Physeteroid from the North Sea Basin Olivier Lambert Giovanni Bianucci Olivier Lambert Giovanni Bianucci world 2019-12-21 text/HTML https://doi.org/10.1080/02724634.2019.1660987 en eng The Society of Vertebrate Paleontology doi:10.1080/02724634.2019.1660987 All rights reserved. https://doi.org/10.1080/02724634.2019.1660987 Text 2019 ftbioone https://doi.org/10.1080/02724634.2019.1660987 2024-05-07T00:51:19Z In contrast to the suction-feeding, predominantly teuthophagous extant sperm whale, several Miocene physeteroids display proportionally larger teeth, deeply embedded in both upper and lower jaws. Together with other osteological features, these differences lead to the functional interpretation of these taxa as macroraptorial predators, using their teeth to capture and process large marine vertebrates. However, the assumption that strong forces applied to macroraptorial physeteroid teeth during powerful bites and contacts with bone material should result in major dental damage has not yet been tested. In the present work, we analyzed a large collection of physeteroid teeth with an enameled crown from the Miocene of the North Sea Basin. We especially focused on a set of 45 teeth of Scaldicetus caretti discovered in Antwerp (Belgium, southern North Sea Basin) and tentatively dated to the Tortonian (early late Miocene). Visual inspection and computed tomography (CT) scans revealed dental damage, including wear and breaks. The latter could be interpreted as chipping fractures, occurring along the crown, and vertical root fractures, observed along the apical part of the massive root. Chipping fractures are most likely due to contacts with hard material, whereas vertical root fractures may result from the application of strong and repetitive bite forces and/or contacts with hard material. Such results further support the interpretation of a series of Miocene physeteroids with proportionally large teeth as macroraptorial (rather than suction-feeding) top predators. Considering the size of the teeth of S. caretti, its most likely prey items were other large marine vertebrates. Text Sperm whale BioOne Online Journals Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology 39 4 e1660987
institution Open Polar
collection BioOne Online Journals
op_collection_id ftbioone
language English
description In contrast to the suction-feeding, predominantly teuthophagous extant sperm whale, several Miocene physeteroids display proportionally larger teeth, deeply embedded in both upper and lower jaws. Together with other osteological features, these differences lead to the functional interpretation of these taxa as macroraptorial predators, using their teeth to capture and process large marine vertebrates. However, the assumption that strong forces applied to macroraptorial physeteroid teeth during powerful bites and contacts with bone material should result in major dental damage has not yet been tested. In the present work, we analyzed a large collection of physeteroid teeth with an enameled crown from the Miocene of the North Sea Basin. We especially focused on a set of 45 teeth of Scaldicetus caretti discovered in Antwerp (Belgium, southern North Sea Basin) and tentatively dated to the Tortonian (early late Miocene). Visual inspection and computed tomography (CT) scans revealed dental damage, including wear and breaks. The latter could be interpreted as chipping fractures, occurring along the crown, and vertical root fractures, observed along the apical part of the massive root. Chipping fractures are most likely due to contacts with hard material, whereas vertical root fractures may result from the application of strong and repetitive bite forces and/or contacts with hard material. Such results further support the interpretation of a series of Miocene physeteroids with proportionally large teeth as macroraptorial (rather than suction-feeding) top predators. Considering the size of the teeth of S. caretti, its most likely prey items were other large marine vertebrates.
author2 Olivier Lambert
Giovanni Bianucci
format Text
author Olivier Lambert
Giovanni Bianucci
spellingShingle Olivier Lambert
Giovanni Bianucci
How to Break a Sperm Whale's Teeth: Dental Damage in a Large Miocene Physeteroid from the North Sea Basin
author_facet Olivier Lambert
Giovanni Bianucci
author_sort Olivier Lambert
title How to Break a Sperm Whale's Teeth: Dental Damage in a Large Miocene Physeteroid from the North Sea Basin
title_short How to Break a Sperm Whale's Teeth: Dental Damage in a Large Miocene Physeteroid from the North Sea Basin
title_full How to Break a Sperm Whale's Teeth: Dental Damage in a Large Miocene Physeteroid from the North Sea Basin
title_fullStr How to Break a Sperm Whale's Teeth: Dental Damage in a Large Miocene Physeteroid from the North Sea Basin
title_full_unstemmed How to Break a Sperm Whale's Teeth: Dental Damage in a Large Miocene Physeteroid from the North Sea Basin
title_sort how to break a sperm whale's teeth: dental damage in a large miocene physeteroid from the north sea basin
publisher The Society of Vertebrate Paleontology
publishDate 2019
url https://doi.org/10.1080/02724634.2019.1660987
op_coverage world
genre Sperm whale
genre_facet Sperm whale
op_source https://doi.org/10.1080/02724634.2019.1660987
op_relation doi:10.1080/02724634.2019.1660987
op_rights All rights reserved.
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1080/02724634.2019.1660987
container_title Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology
container_volume 39
container_issue 4
container_start_page e1660987
_version_ 1800738902027272192