Aerial VHF tracking of wildlife using an unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV): comparing efficiency of yellow-eyed penguin (Megadyptes antipodes) nest location methods

Context. Locating cryptic animals is an important aspect of many wildlife management programs and research studies. However, this process can be inefficient, time-consuming and expensive. Unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs), unmanned aircraft systems (UASs) or drones fitted with a camera are increasingl...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Wildlife Research
Main Authors: Chris G. Muller, B. Louise Chilvers, Zane Barker, Kelvin P. Barnsdale, Phil F. Battley, Rebecca K. French, Josh McCullough, Fred Samandari
Format: Text
Language:English
Published: CSIRO Publishing 2019
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1071/WR17147
id ftbioone:10.1071/WR17147
record_format openpolar
spelling ftbioone:10.1071/WR17147 2024-06-02T08:06:05+00:00 Aerial VHF tracking of wildlife using an unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV): comparing efficiency of yellow-eyed penguin (Megadyptes antipodes) nest location methods Chris G. Muller B. Louise Chilvers Zane Barker Kelvin P. Barnsdale Phil F. Battley Rebecca K. French Josh McCullough Fred Samandari Chris G. Muller B. Louise Chilvers Zane Barker Kelvin P. Barnsdale Phil F. Battley Rebecca K. French Josh McCullough Fred Samandari world 2019-02-12 text/HTML https://doi.org/10.1071/WR17147 en eng CSIRO Publishing doi:10.1071/WR17147 All rights reserved. https://doi.org/10.1071/WR17147 Text 2019 ftbioone https://doi.org/10.1071/WR17147 2024-05-07T00:50:12Z Context. Locating cryptic animals is an important aspect of many wildlife management programs and research studies. However, this process can be inefficient, time-consuming and expensive. Unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs), unmanned aircraft systems (UASs) or drones fitted with a camera are increasingly being used for counting and monitoring wildlife; however, these are often not suitable for cryptic species. Very high-frequency (VHF) radio-tracking is commonplace; however, single-channel VHF receivers mean that animals must be tracked individually, or scanning receivers must be used; but this raises the possibility of signals being missed.Aims. We aimed to test the effectiveness of aerial VHF tracking using a multi-channel receiver for locating wildlife.Methods. We tracked wildlife fitted with VHF transmitters operating on individual frequencies, by means of a UAV with a multi-channel VHF receiver to simultaneously monitor all frequencies. This offered distinct advantages over traditional single-channel scanning receivers. To test and compare this novel method, yellow-eyed penguins (Megadyptes antipodes) were located on nests hidden under vegetation on Enderby Island in the New Zealand subantarctic, using manual ground searching, unassisted ground VHF tracking, as well as using location flights by the UAV Drone Ranger system.Key results. The UAV system allowed for faster nest location than did all other methods, with a higher cumulative success (number of nests found each day) and lower search effort required (person hours per nest).Conclusions. Aerial VHF tracking can greatly extend the search range and minimise search effort compared with ground VHF tracking or manual searching.Implications. This technology has applications for locating and tracking a wide range of wildlife, particularly cryptic species that may be difficult to find using other methods. Text Enderby Island BioOne Online Journals New Zealand Wildlife Research 46 2 145
institution Open Polar
collection BioOne Online Journals
op_collection_id ftbioone
language English
description Context. Locating cryptic animals is an important aspect of many wildlife management programs and research studies. However, this process can be inefficient, time-consuming and expensive. Unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs), unmanned aircraft systems (UASs) or drones fitted with a camera are increasingly being used for counting and monitoring wildlife; however, these are often not suitable for cryptic species. Very high-frequency (VHF) radio-tracking is commonplace; however, single-channel VHF receivers mean that animals must be tracked individually, or scanning receivers must be used; but this raises the possibility of signals being missed.Aims. We aimed to test the effectiveness of aerial VHF tracking using a multi-channel receiver for locating wildlife.Methods. We tracked wildlife fitted with VHF transmitters operating on individual frequencies, by means of a UAV with a multi-channel VHF receiver to simultaneously monitor all frequencies. This offered distinct advantages over traditional single-channel scanning receivers. To test and compare this novel method, yellow-eyed penguins (Megadyptes antipodes) were located on nests hidden under vegetation on Enderby Island in the New Zealand subantarctic, using manual ground searching, unassisted ground VHF tracking, as well as using location flights by the UAV Drone Ranger system.Key results. The UAV system allowed for faster nest location than did all other methods, with a higher cumulative success (number of nests found each day) and lower search effort required (person hours per nest).Conclusions. Aerial VHF tracking can greatly extend the search range and minimise search effort compared with ground VHF tracking or manual searching.Implications. This technology has applications for locating and tracking a wide range of wildlife, particularly cryptic species that may be difficult to find using other methods.
author2 Chris G. Muller
B. Louise Chilvers
Zane Barker
Kelvin P. Barnsdale
Phil F. Battley
Rebecca K. French
Josh McCullough
Fred Samandari
format Text
author Chris G. Muller
B. Louise Chilvers
Zane Barker
Kelvin P. Barnsdale
Phil F. Battley
Rebecca K. French
Josh McCullough
Fred Samandari
spellingShingle Chris G. Muller
B. Louise Chilvers
Zane Barker
Kelvin P. Barnsdale
Phil F. Battley
Rebecca K. French
Josh McCullough
Fred Samandari
Aerial VHF tracking of wildlife using an unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV): comparing efficiency of yellow-eyed penguin (Megadyptes antipodes) nest location methods
author_facet Chris G. Muller
B. Louise Chilvers
Zane Barker
Kelvin P. Barnsdale
Phil F. Battley
Rebecca K. French
Josh McCullough
Fred Samandari
author_sort Chris G. Muller
title Aerial VHF tracking of wildlife using an unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV): comparing efficiency of yellow-eyed penguin (Megadyptes antipodes) nest location methods
title_short Aerial VHF tracking of wildlife using an unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV): comparing efficiency of yellow-eyed penguin (Megadyptes antipodes) nest location methods
title_full Aerial VHF tracking of wildlife using an unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV): comparing efficiency of yellow-eyed penguin (Megadyptes antipodes) nest location methods
title_fullStr Aerial VHF tracking of wildlife using an unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV): comparing efficiency of yellow-eyed penguin (Megadyptes antipodes) nest location methods
title_full_unstemmed Aerial VHF tracking of wildlife using an unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV): comparing efficiency of yellow-eyed penguin (Megadyptes antipodes) nest location methods
title_sort aerial vhf tracking of wildlife using an unmanned aerial vehicle (uav): comparing efficiency of yellow-eyed penguin (megadyptes antipodes) nest location methods
publisher CSIRO Publishing
publishDate 2019
url https://doi.org/10.1071/WR17147
op_coverage world
geographic New Zealand
geographic_facet New Zealand
genre Enderby Island
genre_facet Enderby Island
op_source https://doi.org/10.1071/WR17147
op_relation doi:10.1071/WR17147
op_rights All rights reserved.
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1071/WR17147
container_title Wildlife Research
container_volume 46
container_issue 2
container_start_page 145
_version_ 1800750963507593216